Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 6 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 1 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   19 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts

Sportsman Act/Filthy Chicken Rule

By (about the author)     Permalink
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Valuable 2   Must Read 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 7/20/14

- Advertisement -
I often shutter at some of the proposed bills coming out of Congress -- especially relating to animals. Senate Bill 2363, a Bipartisan Sportsmen's Act of 2014, was one such bill which sent chills down my spine. That it was introduced by Democraticlegislator Kay Hagan of N.Carolina also surprised me. I had been receiving requests for political contributions from her and was sorry I couldn't help. Now, I am so glad I didn't.
And not surprisingly to me, Ohio's Republican Senator Rob Portman was a co-sponsor. I have NEVER ever gotten a reply from him re the many, many e-mails I sent him through petitions- many involving animal and environmental issues. At least our Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown responded to most of mine. However, I am still waiting for a response from him and Representive Marcy Kaptur regarding the SAFE Act which would stop the sale of our horses to Mexico and Canada and the horrible
slaughter which follows.

- Advertisement -
The full title of the Sportsman Bill: A bill to protect and enhance opportunities for recreational hunting, fishing, and shooting and for other purposes. Provisions:

*The bill would exempt ammunition and fishing tackle that contains LEAD from being regulated by the Toxic Substances Control Act.
*The bill would allow states to issue electronic duck stamps instead of forcing hunters to wait for physical stamps.
- Advertisement -
*The bill would provide grants for wetland conservation.

The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation supported the bill saying it "protects the use of traditional ammunition, allows more flexibility for federal funds to be used to build and maintain ranges on public lands and ensures access to federal lands for hunting, shooting, and other outdoor activities."

Isn't that nice? They think that hunters should be able to use public lands when- as I've read somewhere, they only make up a small percentage of Americans. What about the concerns of those of us who see hunting as cruel and unnecessary?

The Animal Welfare Institute opposed the bill and said, "It is an attack on our nation's wild animals and habitat." They also feared the bill would eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate hazardous substances -- including lead which is a dangerous neurotoxin which is released by ammunition and sport fishing waste.

In the process, I learned some civics re this bill as well. It failed CLOTURE in the Senate on July 10, 2014. And because of this, the bill was provisionally dead due to a failed vote for cloture. (Cloture is required to move past a Senate filibuster or the threat of a filibuster and takes a 3/5ths vote. In practice, most bills must pass cloture to move forward in the senate.)

And today I also happily read a corroborating message from In Defense of Animals-"The Sportsmen's Bill (S.2363) has been killed. Huge victory for wildlife and public lands." The bill would have been devastating to the protection of wild animals and public lands. It would also have prioritized hunting, fishing, shooting, and trapping on public land and even allowed the importation of trophies (body parts) from polar bears killed by hunters even though they have been listed as threatened since 2008.
Yes, IDA I agree-- it is truly a victory for wildlife and public lands. There is nothing selfish in all of this. The Sportsman bill would I believe have been a selfish endeavor-for the relatively few Americans who hunt and fish -- only for the pleasure of killing sentient life without need.
AN ILL-ADVISED RULE RE THE SLAUGHTERING OF CHICKENS BEING CONSIDERED

It sounds great- the "Modernization of Poultry Slaughter Inspection Rule" which, according to the petition I received today is something we need to tell President Obama and Secretary Vilsack to abandon. How could anyone think that allowing the poultry companies to inspect their own chicken slaughtering would be a good thing?
Per the Food & Water Watch -- "Only Superman would inspect 175 chickens per minute. Eliminating government inspectors and replacing them with chicken company employees may save a few dollars, but at too high a price. President Obama is considering final approval of the ""Filthy Chicken Rule."

Obama continues to disappoint. When it comes to animal suffering, he seems to have no heart or concern for them. Even now with USDA inspections -- thousands and thousands of chickens daily go through a horrendous and cruel slaughtering line -- some of them boiled alive in the process. And now he and Vilsack think that USDA inspections are not needed? What is needed is continued survellience and harsh penalties for
infractions wherever these poor birds suffer at the hands of greedy
corporate owners. What is needed is getting rid of the battery cages from hell so that these poor animals can have a life. And they are instead considering making even a greater hell for the chickens with the new proposed Filthy Chicken Rule.

I doubt that Obama looks up to and respects Mohatma Gandhi who said you can judge a nation by the way it treats its animals. America is no shining example of compassion to animals- though some nations are considerably worse. Today again I received news that Spain continues to use spent greyhounds for hunting and they treat them abominably
in the process. It should not come as a surprise. Many animals besides bulls suffer at their hands.
And of course, South Korea persists in eating dog meat. There are concerns re food hygiene and the illegal slaughter of canines. Per Lee Yong-ju of the Korean Animal Welfare Association "Some people argue that if we legalize the industry, it could help improve (dog) food hygiene. But history shows dogs can't be raised for food in a rational manner."
(They are even beaten to death to make their meat more tender.)

China too stubbornly defends its yearly dog meat festival which continues despite protests. They say "This is our tradition, and we are used to eating dog. It's (part of) our culture, and we won't change...But we won't kill our pet," one butcher, who's been in the trade for 10 years, told CNN." Should we be impressed with his illogic? All dogs are potential pets --given the chance.

 

I have been concerned about animal suffering ever since
I received my first puppy Peaches in 1975. She made me take a good look at the animal kingdom and I was shocked to see how badly we treat so many animals. At 77, I've been a vegan for the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Horse Racing Cruelty

Vote NO on Issue 2 if You Llive in Ohio

Leo Grillo/Delta Rescue

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 19 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

When I was writing about the horrendous suffering ... by Suzana Megles on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 9:12:05 AM
I forgot to mention why its called the "Filthy Chi... by Suzana Megles on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 10:10:45 AM
I got a kick out of your poor use of the English l... by Bill Johnson on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 11:01:13 AM
Thanks for your "kind" reply. Guilty as charged. ... by Suzana Megles on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:06:09 PM
My apologies if you thought I was being too hard o... by Bill Johnson on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:55:27 PM
Apology accepted, but please don't bad mouth the e... by Suzana Megles on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:32:51 PM
Yet another oxymoron to add to my lengthy list: a ... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:38:06 PM
Thanks Daniel for your comment - as always interes... by Suzana Megles on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:39:29 PM
I am agreeing with you on the majority of hunters,... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:29:13 AM
I'd have to disagree with you on your compassion a... by Bill Johnson on Monday, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:06:17 AM
I am most pleased to hear of the conservation effo... by Daniel Geery on Monday, Jul 21, 2014 at 11:11:39 AM
" I often shutter at some of the proposed bills c... by Jerry Wesner on Sunday, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:45:20 PM
Thanks Jerry for your input. I am glad that New M... by Suzana Megles on Monday, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:41:03 AM
Lead is pretty stable stuff. Further, whatever... by sesquiculus on Wednesday, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:05:45 PM
Lead poisoning is why it was required to be remove... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:25:50 PM
That is non-metallic lead. Metallic lead as used... by sesquiculus on Thursday, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:11:20 PM
Well then, I continue to learn something new every... by Daniel Geery on Thursday, Jul 24, 2014 at 7:04:26 PM
Since you asked--- EPA monograph: "Behavior of Met... by sesquiculus on Thursday, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:36:59 PM
Informative and interesting. Details are rarely no... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:46:54 AM