Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite Get Embed HTML Code View Article Stats
11 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Spinning Bad Financial News Into Good

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 9   Valuable 9   Well Said 7  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to None 9/8/12

Become a Fan
  (311 fans)

opednews.com

Cross-posted from Paul Craig Roberts


Friday's payroll jobs report says that 96,000 new jobs were created in August and that the unemployment rate (U.3) fell from 8.3% to 8.1%. As 96,000 new jobs are not enough to keep up with population growth, the decline in the U.3 unemployment rate was caused by 368,000 discouraged job seekers giving up on finding employment and dropping out of the work force as measured by U.3. Discouraged workers are not included in the U.3 measure of unemployment, which makes the measure useless. The only purpose of U.3 is to keep bad news out of the news. the U.3 unemployment rate only measures those who have not been discouraged by the inability to find a job and are still actively seeking employment.

The government produces another unemployment measure, U.6, which includes people who have been discouraged by the inability to find a job and have been out of the work force for less than a year. This measure of unemployment is 14.7%, a number that would get attention if reported.

When the long-term (more than one year) discouraged workers are included, the US unemployment rate is about 22%. In other words, the real US rate of unemployment is almost three times higher than the reported -- headline rate -- of 8.1%.

What is the purpose of reporting an unemployment rate that is about one-third the real unemployment rate? The only answer is deception through Happy News.

Let's have a look at those 96,000 jobs. What kind of high-tech, high-income super jobs is "the world's only superpower, the indispensable nation, the world's greatest economy and capitalist heaven" creating? The answer is lowly paid third-world jobs, which is why there is not, and cannot be, an economic recovery. All the good jobs have been moved offshore in order to maximize the incomes of the rich.

According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), 28,300 of the 96,000 jobs or 29% are waitresses and bartenders.

Health care and social services, primarily ambulatory health-care services and home health-care services, provided 21,700 jobs or 22.6% of the jobs.

So, 52% of the new jobs created by the American superpower are lowly paid waitresses, bartenders, practical nurses, and hospital orderlies.

Highly paid manufacturing jobs declined by 15,000. The incomes lost by these jobs most likely exceed the income gains from the waitresses, bartenders, and hospital orderlies jobs.

Where did the other 46,000 jobs come from?

Formerly, in hard times government employment would expand, but, despite Republican propaganda, not today in today's mean times. Government (federal, state and local) lost 7,000 jobs.

Professional and business services gained 28,000 jobs, primarily in computer systems design and related services (mainly Indians on H-1B work visas) and management and technical consulting services (mainly former corporate professional employees who now eke out a living by consulting, without pension or health benefits, with their former employers; in other words, they are working the same for less).

These three categories account for 81% of the new jobs.

Where are the remainder?

A few thousand jobs in finance and insurance, jobs that absorb consumer incomes but produce no product. Telephone, cable, water, electricity, and heating produced 8,800 jobs. Transportation and warehousing to store unsold goods produced 5,700 jobs. Retail trade, primarily food and beverage stores (alcohol), produced 6,100 jobs.

And there you have it. The "powerful American economy" is an economy that cannot produce its own clothes and shoes, or the manufactured products -- including high technology products -- that it consumes, or its own energy, all of which it imports by issuing more debt.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/

Dr. Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury for Economic Policy in the Reagan Administration. He was associate editor and columnist with the Wall Street Journal, columnist for Business Week and the Scripps Howard News Service. He is a contributing editor to Gerald Celente's Trends Journal. He has had numerous university appointments. His latest book, The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West is available here:  http://www.amazon.com/Failure-Capitalism-Economic-Dissolution-ebook/dp/B00BLPJNWE/ref=sr_1_17?ie=UTF8&qid=1362095594&sr=8-17&keywords=paul+craig+roberts





Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
[SERIES]
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

full employment by Ernie Messerschmidt on Saturday, Sep 8, 2012 at 8:04:57 PM
Banks, banks, banks by Marika on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:56:21 AM
GS rules? by Ernie Messerschmidt on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:10:31 AM
Occam's razor ... by Ad Du on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:43:36 PM
What should be done? by Michael David Morrissey on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 3:24:56 AM
Corporatists are hijackers of conservatism by manifesto 2000 on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 9:45:11 AM
Investment? by Michael David Morrissey on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 11:22:06 AM
What COULD be done ? by Ad Du on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:57:39 PM
Defense Industry Workers have Plenty of Income by Steven G. Erickson on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 4:56:40 PM
LET'S PRAY by catherine diamond on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 6:32:39 PM
Some sobering financial news - that's for sure by Lance Ciepiela on Sunday, Sep 9, 2012 at 8:41:35 PM