Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H4) on 9/10/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (8 comments)

Son of the Morning Star: Custer and the Little Bighorn, by Evan S. Connell

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (37 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

I enjoyed Son of the Morning Star so much, I read it twice. And around the same time, I read two other books that were similar - Black Sea by Neal Ascherson, and And No Birds Sing by Mark Jaffe. The three books are similar, although it's hard to say exactly how. The best I can do is to describe them as non-academic histories which are so well-written and have such compelling central themes that you can't put them down. They're also similarly filled with digressive narratives and descriptions of subjects peripherally related to their main themes, meanderings dear to the heart of fact-freaks like myself. Son of the Morning Star is the name the Sioux gave to George Armstrong Custer, and Evan Connell's near-masterpiece is the best of the three books.


George Armstrong Custer, at Wikimedia


It resembles an academic book, with an extensive bibliography and useful index, but Connell is not an academic. He's simply a writer of marvelous non-fiction, with varied interests, and there's an entry for him at Wikipedia. Click here. Connell's Custer book is not only a biography of the brilliant Union cavalry officer turned Indian-killer, but a treatment of the historic causes, and many of the historic consequences, of the Battle of the Little Bighorn.


The Massacre at Little Big Horn, Montana June 25 1876, at Wikimedia

I do have one problem with Son of the Morning Star, which incidentally was described as a "masterpiece" by Larry McMurtry in a letter to the New York Review of Books in 1999, a long ten years ago and fifteen years after the book was published. Evan Connell has a lot to say -- and a lot with little good -- about soldiers, the U.S. Government, Indian Agents, Indians themselves, settlers and gold rushers, and the American public. And as a dedicated misanthropist, I thought I had recognized a fellow soul in the author. Until I read Connell's characterization of the "constellation of traits in Custer"...(like)..."a demigod... Siegfried, Roland, Galahad."

Now, I can go with Siegfried and Roland, but Galahad? Of the very few references to women other than Elizabeth Custer in the book's Index, there's Clara Blinn, a kidnapped white who with her infant son was in Cheyenne Chief Black Kettle's village by the WashitaRiver when the Seventh Cavalry massacred it in 1868. Subsequently, the Blinns' bodies were found near the village, the mother shot twice through the head, the infant's body so "little marked" that Connell surmises he was slung against a tree. Mrs. Blinn had got out a note to the U.S. Army pleading to be rescued but as Connell writes: "If Custer knew about this frantic plea, it made no difference...His concern was"the destruction of an enemy stronghold." Custer loved children and animals, fine music, books, and battle, but from the evidence in Son of the Morning Star, he paid very little attention to women, including his dear wife Elizabeth. And that's not my idea of a Galahad.

Maybe I'm picking nits here; maybe that's the way it was out West then; maybe the author's subject was really the battle in some sense, and not George Armstrong Custer. But my overall impression remains: Connell treated Custer considerably more favorably than the groups mentioned above. Accordingly, I think the book contains Custer-puffing and I'd hold back the word masterpiece from describing it.

Nonetheless, this almost-masterpiece by Evan Connell is a hell of a read, and I recommend it unreservedly.

 

I have a law degree (Stanford, 66') but have never practiced. Instead, from 1967 through 1977, I tried to contribute to the revolution in America. As unsuccessful as everyone else over that decade, in 1978 I went to work for the U.S. Forest (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Little Big Horn by Jason Paz on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:50:33 AM
Actually, Jason, by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:05:40 AM
Sorrrry, Jase. by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:09:14 AM
Paleface and Injuns: History is written by the victors. by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:24:57 PM
I share your perspective, Meryl. by GLloyd Rowsey on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:06:52 PM
excellent piece, GL by sometimes blinded on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:32:42 PM
Nevertheless, by Allan Wayne on Thursday, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:47:12 PM
Good question, Allan. by GLloyd Rowsey on Saturday, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:06:30 AM