Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   25 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Some Problems with HR Bill 676

By       Message Mark Green     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

- Advertisement -

Comments on HR 676

http://www.guaranteedhealthcare.org/legislation/hr-676-conyers/united-states-national-health-insurance-act

A noble attempt and I am almost for it. I am 100% for a Medicare based single party payer delivering universal health coverage. There are many benefits available from this bill and they are listed elsewhere. I will focus on the problems.

You cannot establish a "global regional budget"- and "cover all medical services"- as envisioned. Utilization will skyrocket. To stay under budget, payments would have to be reduced, becoming progressively more unfair toward the end of each fiscal year.

Everyone needs to pay a monthly premium, scalable to income. Having a premium assigned will allow ownership of the plan and will supply a lever that can be used to prod individuals into a healthier lifestyle. For example, if someone continually fails to control certain risks, as with smoking or hypertension, they could be assessed a few dollars more each month. They would be reminded of their need to improve each time they received their premium statement. Small sums added would be sufficient to make people think.

Everyone needs a per incidence co-pay. It does not have to be much. I was working an outlying emergency room one night and a mother brought in her oldest child for "cold symptoms". She then signed the other 5 children in "just to be checked." Don't think for an instant that over utilization will not be a problem under HR 676 as written.

Drug costs could be controlled by paying a flat rate for a given class of drugs. If a different drug was desired we would still pay that set amount toward the new drug and the patient would pay the difference. Patients would pressure the providers for the lowest priced options and drug companies would feel pressure to keep their drugs within an affordable range. Negotiating with the drug companies, as envisioned, would leave the system open to fraud and favoritism.

Tapping into the "top 5%"- of income earners is not always tapping into people with disposable income. Many people live at the edge of their income as it is. All people need to pay a scalable fair share. We need to avoid building resentment for the system.

- Advertisement -

If you require all people to be covered under a universal plan and require all providers to accept the plan, you do not have to mandate anything to private insurance companies. There will not be a market for their product.

Too much of a "Mandate"- will simply breed resentment. It would be better to just make the product indispensable.

Mark Green

1Sept2008

OurHealthReform.com

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

I am an average person who happens to be very concerned about the state of health care delivery in the United States. So many politicians and other persons of interest spread so much misinformation about reform, the only way to make it happen is to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

McCain Vs Obama on Healthcare Reform

Some Problems with HR Bill 676

Healthcare and the Malpractice Industry

Modification of Medicare to give Universal Healthcare

Private Health Insurance: Why do we need it?

Medicare Can be Revised for Universal Healthcare

Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

 
- Advertisements -

Microsoft Office 365 Project by Apps4Rent to colloborate and manage projects from virtually anywhere, is a proud sponsor of Opednews.com: Office 365 Project

Cloud Desktop Online by Apps4Rent provides managed hosted virtual desktop along with 24 x 7 support, is a proud sponsor of Opednews.com: Hosted Virtual Desktop

 

Copyright © 2002-2016, OpEdNews

Powered by Populum