Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Smile and Substance

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to None 10/15/12

Become a Fan
  (13 fans)

(Article changed on October 15, 2012 at 10:39)

BIDEN LAUGHS OFF RYAN

  AP Photo

Smile when you say that -- Laughter turned out to be a big part of Biden's debate strategy

Another example of an overblown sh*t-storm from the Right -- caused, in this case, by its pigging out on post-debate sour grapes -- is the crap it's been slinging about Joe Biden getting all smiley-faced during his debate against temporary Mitt Romney wingman Paul Ryan.   But for me a fascinating sidebar to the seething spotlight placed on Biden's animated smiles could have been about how little was made of something else.   That "something else" of course, would be the thoroughly smug, sh*t-eating grin that Ryan's mug expanded into during each sharp rebuttal by Biden to a Ryan assertion that provoked the vice-president's facial gesticulations in the first place.  

The pattern was set early: Ryan issues a bug-eyed claim -- about the supposed fiscal wrongheadedness of the stimulus for example -- which sparks an "OMG" response of some kind from Biden; an astonished smile, low chuckle or a cheeky eye-roll.   Biden then unfurls a sharply-informed take down that incorporates the two written requests made by Ryan for a grab at some of that tainted stimulus money for his state.   As the take down occurs, Ryan's face morphs into that tight-lipped sh*t-eating grin.   This smiley-face versus sh*t-face duel goes on until, by the time Ryan's pitching his half-baked claim of "six studies" that validate the convoluted psycho-math of the Romney/Ryan budget, Biden -- likely aware that three of Ryan's "studies" are blog posts while another is an op-ed -- is in full knee-slapping mode as he commences with yet another evidence-based take down that further swallowed Ryan into that God-awful grin of his.

Now could a case be made that the hilarious spin Biden attached to Ryan's assertions was intemperate, undignified and beneath the stature of a vice-president?   In general, probably yes.   And based on their reactions, that was clearly the debate's takeaway for many Romney supporters and others on the Right.

"I've never seen a debate in which one participant was as openly disrespectful of the other as Biden was to Paul Ryan tonight." sniffed Fox News' Chris Wallace.

He was "disrespectful and full of bluster," snooted the Wall Street Journal's resident op-ed page haughty, Peggy Noonan .

"It was so disrespectful," wailed Fox News analyst Charles Krauthammer. ""it was sort of almost unprecedented and hugely condescending."

"You don't win a nationally televised debate by being rude and obnoxious," whined the Weekly Standard's utterly insipid Fred Barnes . "You don't win with facial expressions, especially smirks or fake laughs."  

Now this should be one of those appreciatively rare instances when I feel the pain of those die-hard wing-nuts.   But as usual, after hearing their arguments I found myself once again led to a place where rationality steps in to shut down any possibility for empathy.

 

Say, "Cheee-sy" -- Ryan endures another Biden take down. Getty Images

As I see it, rather than being viewed as an expression of pure contempt that's utterly inappropriate for what was transpiring, Biden's smiling, and whatever else peed off his critics., more likely deserves consideration as a show of respect for his opponent's greatest achievement to date:   reaching the point of actually sitting across the table to engage in what Ryan has repeatedly called for -- "a serious debate"-- with of all people, the vice-president of the United States.   Why shouldn't Biden's antics be seen as Joe's way of projecting that he believes Ryan is smart enough to fully appreciate that a debate approach characterized by flinging out assertions that have no basis in fact couldn't possibly be Ryan's idea of a "serious" debate?  

In reality, it was Biden who took into consideration the history rooted in the dead-serious significance of the process Americans undergo in choosing who will lead this country.   Indeed the appropriate display of contempt for the gall by a mainstream vice-presidential candidate like Ryan to utilize that process in such a farcical manner might well be to simply walk off the stage with a vow not to return until young Mr. Ryan begins to take this matter more seriously.  

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Anthony Barnes, of Boston, Massachusetts, is a free-lance writer who leans toward the progressive end of the political spectrum. "When I was a young man, I wanted to change the world. I found it was difficult to change the world, so I tried to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

SURPRISE! Chris Christie's 2016 Gambit

Starlight and Shadows

PIG TALES

ERRORS AND NO FACTS: Business as Usual at Fox News

ISRAEL'S SHAME

"Smart-Ass White Boys"

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

there aren't too many more who could have better m... by Anthony Barnes on Monday, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:51:23 AM