Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Skin in the Game

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 5/15/10

Capitalism seems to work reasonably well when it operates on a small scale. A young entrepreneur opens a small store or factory, works hard and thinks hard about how to balance the problem of attracting customers while still making enough profit to stay in business and maybe even grow. Maybe the business is successful, making the entrepreneur prosperous and able to provide good jobs for employees, but often the business fails.

It is said that small businesses provide most of our new jobs, but it is also true that small businesses provide most of our job losses. There are no guarantees for the small business owner and failure is commonplace.

The situation is different for the corporate executive. Whether or not the corporation prospers, the executive is rewarded handsomely. This is surely one of the symptoms of an economic system that has gone awry and that something needs to be fixed. The problem is that unlike the small entrepreneur, the corporate executive has no real skin in the game.

We have recently seen some truly awful examples of this phenomena. For example, the executives of Goldman Sacks and of other big banks led their firms into a disaster of international significance. But instead of being punished for their dismal lack of good judgment they are rewarded with promotions and bonuses, not to mention a promise of golden parachutes beyond the dreams of ordinary mortals.

Today we are in the midst of another example in the Gulf of Mexico. This is not the first time that BP has been involved in an oil rig failure and it will probably not be the last; but what are the chances that a BP executive will be held personally responsible in the matter. What about more than one?

There is a terrible moral hazard in operation around corporations that allows their executives to take great risks that damage the environment and innocent bystanders but suffer little or no personal risk. This is not just wrong in an abstract sense of what is just, it is foolish and counterproductive.

The corporate structure was invented for the purpose of limiting personal risk of capital. It is healthy in the case of the small business that there is this way of limiting personal financial risk. However it is not in the public interest that this limitation of risk should keep the public from being protected from risk to the environment and to the economy.

A small step in this direction could be made when a corporation interacts with the government. Individuals should be made personally responsible for egregious offenses like the oil spill in the Gulf. I would suggest that current senior executives, board members and even consultants involved in this event be designated as "toxic" and that in the future any corporation with a "toxic" executive, board member or consultant be denied drilling permits.

This concept could be extended to banks and other corporations that have required bailouts, preventing the extension of government contracts, loans, loan guarantees or other government largess if they hire toxic employees for senior positions. The idea is to make these executives more responsible for what they do, to make it clear that their future employment in their industry is at stake. The idea is to reduce the moral hazard and to push these executives to behave with more prudence. They don't even have to go to prison.


A concerned citizen and former mathematician/engineer now retired and living in rural Maine.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Who Pays Taxes?

Liberate Yourself from the Mainstream Media

Who Pays Taxes II

Conservatives Without Conscience

Let's Have More Political Parties

Centralized Power is Always a Danger


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

I don't have any problems with prison and fines fo... by PrMaine on Saturday, May 15, 2010 at 11:48:12 PM
but isn't this a redux of all we have been saying ... by Sherry Mann on Sunday, May 16, 2010 at 10:51:18 AM