Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
17 comments

Sci Tech

Show-me State Endorses Cold Fusion

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Funny 1   Inspiring 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 7/26/13
Become a Fan
  (36 fans)

opednews.com

Report from the 18 th Annual International Conference on Cold Fusion (ICCF-18
Columbia, MO 21-26 July, 2013

Where to begin? Cold Fusion is one of those fields where the reality is different from the reporting. If you read the newspapers or the science magazines, you think that cold fusion is junk science, discredited after a single un-reproducible report in 1989. If you still think this way, please begin with the article I wrote for OEN last yea r.

The effect is real and remarkable on three counts:

  • As a scientific phenomenon it is completely unexpected. Nuclear energy is a million times bigger than the energy of a chemical bond, and we don't understand how anything you can do with a metal foil and a 2-volt battery could trigger a nuclear reaction.

  • As a sociological phenomenon, it is striking how the science has been suppressed. Cold fusion results are routinely and categorically rejected by physics and engineering journals. Submissions will not be sent out for peer review. There is no support from NSF. DoE works behind the scenes to nix any funding for CF research, even when it comes from other government departments. The Patent Office files CF applications in the same round file that is used for perpetual motion machines and faster-than-light travel. (Meanwhile, there is a small program in CF research at the Naval Research Lab, and the Army has been an early customer for CF generators that have been (prematurely) offered for pre-order.)

  • As a possible solution to our energy and environmental woes, CF is potentially a godsend. If only it can be turned on and off reliably, it will be safe, non-polluting, cheap, inexhaustible, and easily scalable to work in a car or a basement without requiring connection to the grid. It is a solution to global warming that requires no government action, only bottom-up capitalism.

The field is a mess. Quality of presentations at the meeting this week ranged from thoroughly professional to completely unworthy. But some of the amateurish presentations had the best documentation. We don't know what's true, or whom to trust. There are dozens of theories, none of them testable. Contradictory experimental results are reported, and undoubtedly much of what is presented is an outright mistake. Professors are working on CF in their spare time, and amateurs are experimenting in their garages. Much of the amateur work is performing at just the level you might expect, but an oncologist in the Western suburbs of Boston has the most reliable, long-lasting, and highest-performance device reported to date. Meanwhile, Toyota is reported to be spending tens of millions of dollars each year on CF research in Japan, but they are rumored to be short on innovation, and in any case they're not publishing their results or coming to meetings.

How much of this is the chaos that's unavoidable at the beginning of a new science? How much is due to the lack of institutional support? There's plenty of each to go around. 

There were 200 people for the 6-day conference.  The crowd was greyer than any I've ever attended. That's because young people know they can't build a career in cold fusion -- they can't even write a dissertation or publish a paper. The lack of patent protection pushes commercial research labs into secrecy. The disdain of the research community and the lack of government support are deeply harmful to the research in the field. Some young faculty members in physics have figured out that this field is enormously promising, but what can they do? If they can't publish, they can't build a career on CF.

How close are we to a breakthrough? There are a handful of companies that claim to be preparing a commercial product. An Italian company called E-Cat demonstrated a product in 2011, and began taking orders for delivery in 2012. Now they have backed off their claims. A Greek company named Defkalion moved recently to British Columbia, and also claims to be on the verge of offering a commercial product. People at this week's meeting were deeply divided over whether they believe Defkalion's claims. They are announcing results, but with no details or supporting data.

Meanwhile, Federal priorities in supporting energy are a national embarrassment. For all the damage to health and the enviornment that has been done by fossil fuels, oil and gas continue to be heavily subsidized. Fracking is an environmentally devastating technology that has been granted exemption from environmental laws and taxation in my home state of Pennsylvania, and elsewhere. Research in hot fusion has squandered $50 billion over the last 50 years, and we're still no closer to a demonstration, let alone a power plant. But there are so many universities receiving so much money for hot fusion research that their influence in Washington prevents a retreat from this error.

Everyone at Mizzou this week believes that a fraction of that funding could launch us into an era of clean, cheap, abundant energy, slashing pollution and rescuing us from global warming in the process.

 

http://daily-inspiration.org

Josh Mitteldorf, an editor at OpEdNews, blogs on aging at http://JoshMitteldorf.ScienceBlog.com. Read how to stay young at http://AgingAdvice.org. Educated to be an astrophysicist, he has branched out from there to mathematical modeling in a (more...)
 
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Cold Fusion: Tangible Hope in an Age of Despair

New Scientific Study: Smoking Gun Evidence of 9/11 Explosives in WTC Dust

PayPal cuts off Bradley Manning Legal Defense; Backs Off under Grass Roots Pressure

Chemical Traces of High Explosives in WTC Debris

Madoff : the Story behind the Story

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

bona fide reports. It is interesting just to note ... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:42:31 PM
Daniel-   I know that some proponents of... by Josh Mitteldorf on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:38:12 PM
that these concepts should not be lumped together.... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:20:59 PM
HI,Thanks to cover that hugely important subject w... by Alain COETMEUR on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:20:04 PM
I'm glad to see you here, and kudos to Josh also f... by Michael David Morrissey on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:59:02 AM
but would add that politics should not be allowed ... by Daniel Geery on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:24:20 PM
I personally would much prefer to see some emphasi... by Paul Repstock on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:19:07 PM
As I say in the article, LENR technology adapts we... by Josh Mitteldorf on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:28:58 PM
See my post below and visit http://www.aesopinstit... by Mark Goldes on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:06:34 PM
The fact that the US gov't is simultaneously pursu... by John Pepper on Friday, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:42:43 PM
Thanks for keeping us informed on this subject, Jo... by Michael David Morrissey on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 1:49:53 AM
Hi, Michael-    I know that Jones w... by Josh Mitteldorf on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:32:51 PM
Sorry, Josh, I take back the question marks. Truth... by Michael David Morrissey on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:44:19 PM
Two Nobel prizewinning physicists have endorsed co... by Josh Mitteldorf on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 12:48:28 PM
An engine that needs no fuel will be produced that... by Mark Goldes on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 3:02:04 PM
It is easy to screw up in the lab.  Every exp... by Richard Pietrasz on Saturday, Jul 27, 2013 at 8:17:03 PM
Dear Richard -    Here are 3 things that... by Josh Mitteldorf on Sunday, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:05:00 AM