Tags for This Article:

State (910)  Money (795)  Children (709)  Health (707)  Capitalism (407)  Work (386)  Time (325)  Funding (266)  Healthcare (183)  Michigan (127)  Hospitalized (6) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...)  (less...)
Add to My Group
July 22, 2008 at 08:45:16

Show Me the Money

by Erica Balk (Posted by Bia Winter)     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 
 
Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

OPEN LETTER: To Our U.S. Senators: Show Me the Money

Are you public servants, or political servants? I'm hoping for the former, but I fear it's the latter.

by ERICA BALK
Dear U.S. Senators:

 

Capitalism needs to be removed from healthcare. This one issue is going to bankrupt this country.
I myself rarely take the time to communicate with my elected representatives. But I'm beginning to feel that we all must take the time out of our lives to let you all know how we feel.

We have so many problems here in Michigan that aren't being addressed at all. I'm a Finance Manager for the Public Works Department in Lansing. We work pretty closely with the State, and I can tell you we're in deep trouble over here. Before you go blaming it all on our dependence on the automotive industry (which admittedly has put us at a disadvantage for the current economic environment), let me point out that our governor is doing a lot to bring in technology-based industries and reduce that dependence. In the meantime, we're bleeding jobs, and therefore bleeding revenues that we need to keep the infrastructure of the community going. We're looking at a 25% reduction in Act 51 funds this coming year, which means less money to fix the roads, and even more importantly, less money to clear snow and ice during bad weather. The City of Lansing is running a $13 million deficit, and the State of Michigan is running a $1 billion deficit. Five years ago we were in the black—had surpluses in fact.

Lack of revenues due to an economy on the downslide is one factor, but do you know what's really killing us in City government? Healthcare, plain and simple. We paid $25 million for employee healthcare benefits (for a work force of fewer than 2000 employees) in 2005. In 2006, that went up another 10%. Our current fringe rate is 112%. So an employee making $25K annually is costing another $28K in benefits. That's projected to increase another 25% in the coming year. We're looking at laying off about one quarter of our regular work force. Police and Fire are political hotbuttons, so they won't be touched. But the folks who keep the City clean, maintain the roads and sewers, keep our water clean, and work in revenue-generating sectors such as Parks and Rec, Parking, Income Tax and Treasury, are all on the block. When those people are laid off, they will no longer have health benefits, along with thousands of others in this state that are in the same predicament. When that happens, these folks will go to the doctor only when they're sick, probably to the ER. They won't be able to pay for it, but the cost will get passed on to those people who are insured. This will cause insurance premiums to rise again. Fewer employers will be able to afford the cost, so more people will lose their insurance benefits. And the cycle continues.

Is it any wonder that major employers who can move their operations outside of the U.S. do so? Even if they pay the exact same wages to foreign employees, they're going to increase their bottom line by 10% off the bat by not paying these benefits.

And insurance companies aren't alone in this. The drug companies that proclaim that prices must be so high so they may fund more research and development, spend billions on advertising. Next time you're in a restaurant or at a retailer, see if the pen they hand you to sign your credit card receipt doesn't have a drug name on it. When you get a sample of a drug from your doctor, how elaborate is the packaging? And when you turn on your television, how many commercials for specific drugs go across the screen in an hour?

I was hospitalized in November for less than 72 hours. The bill was $8000. I am fortunate to be insured, but I do get the itemized bill. I was charged $14 for two regular-strength run-of-the-mill Tylenol. Another drug they gave me cost $38.50 per pill. I was sent home without my problem being resolved, and told to monitor my diet. This is insane!

There seems to be a competition between the insurance companies and drug companies (in their glass and steel palaces...some of the most costly buildings in the world) to see who can make the most money. And the patient gets the short end of the stick. Advertising by drug companies should be illegal. Advertising by insurance companies is questionable, but more understandable given that they are in direct competition for the consumer dollar. Drug companies, however, should be limiting their advertising to health care providers, who should be the ones making the decisions about what medications to prescribe, not the patients themselves. Capitalism needs to be removed from healthcare. This one issue is going to bankrupt this country, and we're the only advanced country in the world that runs our healthcare system this way. The money being spent in Iraq on a monthly basis could fund a public health care system. But that would take a lot of money out of a lot of people's pockets, wouldn't it?

So to circle back to my original statement, I'm not naive enough to believe that the United States can function as an island. We can't. But we don't need to have our fingers in every little pie around the world. And stop lying to us about this "war on terror." That is such a ridiculous concept. We won't end terrorism by making war on any one country. People who commit acts of terror exist in every country in the world, and there's no way to prevent every possible act. And taking leaders who promote terrorism out of power won't stop it either. Most of the terrorists who are really commited have their basis in extremist religious doctrine, not in political power bases. You've been getting away with it by preying on the fears of a largely uneducated American public. And we breed our own terrorists right here in the good old U S of A, but they tend to be white males between the ages of 25 and 45, or have we already forgotten Timothy McVeigh, the Unabomber, the abortion clinic bombings in the South and in Boston...need I go on?

And how can we continue to give money to other governments? I manage our personal finances, as well as those of my employer. When my checkbook's in the red, I tell charities that I just can't afford to give. The bills need to be paid and I need to buy groceries first. That only makes sense. But our government seems to operate on the concept that as long as there are checks in the checkbook, we can go on spending.

I am commited to the concept that the citizens are my employer, and I owe them the best possible job I can do. I'm even willing to take a pay cut to accomplish it. How about all of you in Washington?

I am a true Public Servant. Everything I do goes directly to the health and safety of the Citizens of Lansing. I'm a good steward. I cut costs wherever I can, and attempt to maintain the funding to provide the same high level of service to our public. My staff spends absolutely no money that isn't absolutely necessary, and they work their tails off. Due to staff cuts I've got one employee who is doing three people's jobs. She's a single mother with three children at home. Yet she never complains, or shows frustration to the citizens she serves. She is a true public servant. I am commited to the concept that the citizens are my employer, and I owe them the best possible job I can do. I'm even willing to take a pay cut to accomplish it. How about all of you in Washington? Are you public servants, or political servants? I'm hoping for the former, but I fear it's the latter.

(Originally published in the Baltimore Chronicle) 

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Take Capitalism out of Healthcare

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Contact Editor

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments

A Man Concerned About The Current State Of America.
Brad EvansA Man Concerned About The Current State Of America.

Aren't You Keeping Up With Current Events???

Over Governance Is The Problem. 

by Brad Evans (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 95 comments) on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 1:19:23 PM
 


Bia Winter is an Artist/Writer from Maine, and has been an activist and letter-writer since the 60's. In 2004 she received the Roger Baldwin Award from the Maine American Civil Liberties Union for furthering Democracy after she got a Resolution Against the USA"Patriot"Act passed in her small home town of Mount Vernon, by overwhelming show-of-hands vote at Town Meeting. She continues to Write, Activate and Cartoon for Progressive causes. Her Letters are often seen in the Baltimore Chronicle, as w...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Bia WinterBia Winter is an Artist/Writer from Maine, and has been an activist and letter-writer since the 60's. In 2004 she received the Roger Baldwin Award from the Maine American Civil Liberties Union for furthering Democracy after she got a Resolution Against the USA"Patriot"Act passed in her small home town of Mount Vernon, by overwhelming show-of-hands vote at Town Meeting. She continues to Write, Activate and Cartoon for Progressive causes. Her Letters are often seen in the Baltimore Chronicle, as w...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Current events

This was written a couple of years ago by my daughter...but I think it is even more pertinent now, which is why I submitted it.

Yes, Better governance would definitly provide the oversight needed to protect us from  the capitalist elements in the Medical system, but even better governance would result in an efficient, single-payer syste. 

by Bia Winter (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 241 comments) on Wednesday, July 23, 2008 at 8:19:10 AM
 


Faculty member at University of Kentucky. Teacher, Researcher, social activist. Political independent who believes in better government, not necessarily smaller or larger government.
Peter WedlundFaculty member at University of Kentucky. Teacher, Researcher, social activist. Political independent who believes in better government, not necessarily smaller or larger government.

Shw me the money

You are absolutely correct, private health care is a disaster, period.  Interest in profits have replaced interest in people in health care today.  Not that profit is bad, but that profit should be driven by improving a product or service.  Instead, increased profits are derived in health care by decreasing the amount and quality of that service although it directly affects peoples health.  In essence, the profit motive is used to suck the life out of people.  This is not capitalism, it is cannablism.  Profit is made not by providing a critical service and improving on that service, but by providing little or no service and the less service provided, the greater the profit. 

The often heard refrain "no socialized medicine" has provided us instead with "socialism for private enterprise".  It is based on the assumption that government cannot do as good a job or be as effective and efficient at providing health care service as private companies.  This assumption is based on the false premise that private health care is providing the best and most efficient quality service at the least price.  It isn't.  It is providing the least service for the greatest price and the longer it remains in force the more discrepant the cost and quality become.  Our health care system today thrives not on providing more for less, but on providing less for more.  There is in fact no incentive for this socialized private health care system to improve, because profits increase the less companies do, not the more they do.

The government is not driven by profits, but by its need to provide a service, which is exactly what the public is demanding.  To suggest no government service can be done efficiently or effectively implies government functions can not be instituted with any oversight or checks and balances to assess their quality.  That is a totally false premise.  Government can provide good service at a reasonable cost if people insiste upon it.  When the US leadership is not interested in transparency or accountability that does not happen, but that is why you vote the bums out who do not do their job.

by Peter Wedlund (2 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 154 comments) on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 1:48:47 PM
 


I am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, preach. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at http://morelife.org/personal/

When the comment time period has closed at OpEdNews.com, readers are welcome to post their comments/questions at MoreLife Yahoo after meeting the posting requirements of that group, sent to all new members upon joining. All archived messages, however, are available to anyone....

to see more of bio, click on member name

Kitty Antonik WakferI am a professional life-extensionist and liberty promoter who practices what I and husband, Paul Wakfer, preach. More detail about both of us - philosophically and physically - at http://morelife.org/personal/

When the comment time period has closed at OpEdNews.com, readers are welcome to post their comments/questions at MoreLife Yahoo after meeting the posting requirements of that group, sent to all new members upon joining. All archived messages, however, are available to anyone....

to see more of bio, click on member name

There is No Real Capitalism in Health Care

Despite the author's contentions and those of commenter Peter Wedlund, the market for health care services is not at all a free market - what in years past was commonly referred to as"capitalism". This term has not been applicable to the US economy for more than 100 years, since before the federal government made "investment in the infrastructure" part of its purpose. (A reading of history will show that it began at the federal level with Lincoln, despite overwhelming failures on the state level.) What exists in full force now is fascism - a commingling of government and business, though far too few will call a spade a spade.

Businesses in the heavily regulated segments - like health care - both suffer and benefit from the presence of government, though this is often not by the same provider. The numbers of health care providers (of virtually all types) and health related products are limited by government regulations that protect those already in that field (restrict the numbers in the field which allows for higher prices charged, some of which is to cover the expense of the adherence to the regulations themselves) but claimed to be protection "for the public". The lack of competition (a true marketplace) from this incestuous relationship of business and government results in the poor and often limited service at prices often exorbitant. The presence of health insurance companies makes no difference because they are highly government regulated themselves.

The main reason why the quality and prices for health care are so terribly askew - low for the former in many cases and high in the latter - is because the provider/customer relationship is heavily interfered with by a third party - government directly and/or through insurance companies. And it should never be forgotten that this interference by government is with the power of legalized use of force. In a truly free market (capitalism of old), a customer and provider of any service/product would trade to mutual benefit, which includes not trading with each other at all. Neither party would have the power to force him/her (hir) self on the other, but could only "do business" if the both agreed on the terms. This hasn't been the case in health care (and most other human areas of trade, though many to a lesser degree) for many years in the US and other industrialized countries, all because of mountains of regulations in just that segment of the economy.

I wrote here at OEN on my husband's and my experience earlier this year with a doctor and hospital in the local area - by all appearance a private physician but in actuality a hospital employee. My lead-in that appeared only in Rob's email newsletter: "Here's the response by someone, who works at staying in excellent health and reserves assets for emergencies - rather than pay insurance premiums - to an outrageous health care charge and its much wider implications."


**Kitty Antonik Wakfer

MoreLife for the rational - http://morelife.org
Reality based tools for more life in quantity and quality
Self-Sovereign Individual Project - http://selfsip.org
Self-sovereignty, rational pursuit of optimal lifetime happiness,
individual responsibility, social preferencing & social contracting

by Kitty Antonik Wakfer (14 articles, 3 quicklinks, 5 diaries, 101 comments) on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 at 8:25:05 PM
 

 

5 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Librarians Against Sarah Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular