Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
  2
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend
  7
9 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
9 comments

General News

Should Your 3-Year-Old Be On Antidepressants?

Become a Fan
  (71 fans)
By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H2 8/7/09

opednews.com

Try to access the website of the Archives of General Psychiatry and you may have to abide an ad for the antidepressant Pristiq before you can enter. (JAMA and its Archives Journals "do not endorse the advertised product," you'll be assured.)

But look for a pharma affiliation for the author of the article "Preschool Depression," Joan L. Luby, MD in the August issue and you'll be told no "financial disclosure" was reported. Not that "Dr. Luby has received grant/research support from Janssen, has given occasional talks sponsored by AstraZeneca, and has served as a consultant for Shire Pharmaceutical," as a 2006 article in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry says.

Even though the pharmaceutical industry has got 27 million Americans on antidepressants thanks to direct to consumer advertising--ten percent of the population--it is looking for depression in preschoolers. And guess what?

It's finding it!

It's easy to make jokes about "preschool depression"--students get it every time the alarm rings--but finding depression, "relapses," "chronicity" and "treatment resistance" in three-year-olds is not funny.

Researchers used to believe that "young children were too cognitively and emotionally immature to experience depressive effects," says Luby but now believe they can and do suffer from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD).

"The potential public health importance of identification of preschool MDD is underscored by the established unique efficacy of early intervention during the preschool period in other childhood disorders," says Luby. "Based in part on the recurrent course and the relative treatment resistance of childhood MDD, there has been increased interest in the identification of the disorder at the earliest possible stage of development."

Translation: they want to screen your kid.

The case for a new social problem to be called preschool depression is so strong, there was only one real wrinkle in Ludy's longitudinal study of 304 preschoolers, funded by our tax dollars at the National Institute of Mental Health.

Instead of having "anxiety disorders" usually associated other MDD sufferers, the three and four-year-olds had "disruptive disorders." Possibly Play-Doh problems.

Undaunted, Luby says the preschoolers need to be screened for impending mental illness because their disruptive behavior "might be associated with social impairment and peer rejection that lead to later MDD."

Of course cynics will point out that drinking milk also predicts MDD and that disruptive behavior is the definition of a preschooler, making terms like preschool "social impairment and peer rejection" laughable academic babble.

But more concerning is what, exactly, is the "treatment" and "intervention" for the at-risk preschooler who might develop depression? And why the hurry?

Is it treatment with Janssen and AstraZenca antipsychotic drugs in which case the MDD is really a Risperdal or Seroquel deficiency?

Like Rebecca Riley given Seroquel at two and dead at four?

And the late Destiny Hager who was given Seroquel at three?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Martha Rosenberg is an award-winning investigative pubic health reporter who covers the food, drug and gun industries. Her first book, Born With A Junk Food Deficiency: How Flaks, Quacks and Hacks Pimp The Public Health, is distributed by Random (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Grassley Investigates Lilly/WebMD link Reported by Washington Post

The Drug Store in Your Tap Water

Are You Sure You're Not Psychotic Asks Shameless Drug Company?

It's the Cymbalta Stupid

MRSA and More. Antibiotics Linked to Obesity and Allergies, Too

Another Poorly Regulated "Derivative"--the Antidepressant Pristiq

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Screened by first grade,Sedated by the second,Soma... by Allan Wayne on Friday, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:15:57 PM
rationale of the American "Health Care" System.  ... by GL Rowsey on Saturday, Aug 8, 2009 at 6:37:09 AM
Dear Martha Unfortunately your bio is very brie... by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Saturday, Aug 8, 2009 at 5:20:43 PM
and I intend to return and supplement this respons... by GL Rowsey on Wednesday, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:17:55 AM
in saying the health care system's rationaleisto t... by GL Rowsey on Wednesday, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:30:01 PM
Dear GL RowseyThank youfor your comment. It is qui... by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:58:47 PM
This on the Internet to go along with the deaths y... by Robin L. Ore on Sunday, Aug 9, 2009 at 3:15:06 AM
Dear Robin:Ishould thank you for teaching me psych... by Abbas Sadeghian, Ph.D. on Sunday, Aug 9, 2009 at 5:32:41 PM
Great article Martha.Joan Luby is right up there w... by Evelyn Pringle on Sunday, Aug 9, 2009 at 2:45:50 PM