Tag(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (5 comments)

Shooting the Messenger

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (2 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

After reading the article titled " WikiLeaks: U.S.-Iran Relations "Now What" Moment? ' [1] by NIAC's Reza Marashi who identifies himself as a former Iran desk officer at the U.S. State Department, I failed to see exactly what "lessons learned' are being presented following release of thousands of the not-so-diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks -- An act that the writer repeatedly labels as an "inexcusable security breach" throughout his treatise.

While condemning the leaks as an "unprecedented violation" and "illegal act" that has put the lives of many U.S. diplomats including some of author's former colleagues in harm's way, they're credited for exposing the ruse of both Bush and Obama administrations seeking a diplomatic solution with Iran and Mr. Marashi himself is quick to admit that Obama's change of "tactics', [which included co-opting NIAC], was only to build a consensus for imposing more severe sanctions on Iran.

Instead of rebuking those who intentionally misled him, Mr. Marashi reserves his harshest criticism for the messenger who has merely exposed the lies and dishonesty of his former superiors in the State Department and delivered where others in the press have miserably failed or refused to do at the expense of the misinformed public.

It is important to remember that contrary to what Mr. Marashi and others claim; nothing Wikileaks has done is illegal. Julian Assange is not an American citizen and does not reside in any U.S. territory and thus not subject to American law. Of course the word "illegal' has been so severely perverted by its propagandists to mean anything that the U.S. government disapproves. A person committing such acts is summarily defined as a criminal and denied any due process or trial.

No government likes having its secrets revealed and there's nothing wrong with aggressively defending national security. But a democratic society requires an informed citizenry that does not blindly accept everything the government says and its subservient media repeats. And because of that leaks like these are necessary because they're our instrument of last resort for bringing some accountability to those in power.

[1] click here

 

Daniel M Pourkesali is an Engineer with an Aerospace company in Northern Virginia specializing in development and manufacturing of flight dynamics, engineering and control systems.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Tweet: WikiLeaks by Daniel Pourkesali on Friday, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:36:08 PM
Absolutely! by Edward Ulysses Cate on Friday, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:35:06 PM
This is how you are deceived. by zonie on Friday, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:58:51 PM
by deception thou shalt make war by zonie on Friday, Dec 3, 2010 at 6:56:53 PM
Valuable and well said. by Mohammad Ala on Sunday, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:55:06 AM