Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 2 Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   17 comments, 2 series

OpEdNews Op Eds

Sheryl Sandberg & #FBRape: A Case Study in the Failure of Corporate Feminism to Combat Misogyny

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 5/27/13

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

(Article changed on May 28, 2013 at 14:55)

(Article changed on May 27, 2013 at 18:48)

She's been interviewed by a beaming Oprah, lauded as the second coming of second wave feminism, held up as a role model, and skewered for hypocrisy. Sheryl Sandberg is the epitome of what Hester Eisenstein called "hegemonic feminism," what I used to call "liberal feminism," but what I know am calling "corporate feminism."

Catharine A. MacKinnon made the astute point that our legal system treats gender equality in a way that - while it may have had the best intentions - actually fails to address much of what women actually experience. Cases of inequality are seen as only valid when the circumstances between men and women are exactly alike. Since men don't experience pregnancy, breastfeeding and the associated child care tasks that often attach to those experiences, they are not entered into the equation.

At the same time, there has been a long tradition of treating the male experience as the normal state of humanity, with the female being some sort of subset. Of course, language has played a role in that tendency, but at least one recent study has shown the persistence of this dynamic even with gender-neutral language. And the website Sociological Images has been cataloging the manifestation of the "male-as-neutral-default" in everyday life.

Both of these dynamic have influenced the development of feminism. Hester Eisenstein, in particular, has pointed out how the goals of feminism have somehow folded themselves into the corporate agenda - with depressed wages and greater participation of mothers in the workforce doing quite well for such things as globalization. But it can also obscure the types of discrimination that are unique to women: objectification and misogyny. In the case of Sandberg, whether she is a champion for the lesser mortals that the rest of us are, is called greatly into question by recent revelation about Facebook, the company in which she has risen to the level of Chief Operating Officer.

- Advertisement -

The WAM! project has recently launched a campaign to protest some truly disgusting images being posted - and accepted - on Facebook, that glorify and laugh at rape and other violence against women. In fact, Facebook defends the practice of allowing these picture to be posted - despite rejecting non-violent photos of breastfeeding mothers, and racist hate speech - by actually categorizing them as humor. Humor. We're talking about pictures of women drugged, beaten, thrown down stairs, tied up, and bleeding.

As the COO of Facebook, Sandberg has not officially weighed in on the #FBrape (as it's known on twitter) campaign, as far as I can tell. This, of course, is a great disappointment to many feminists who are outraged by Facebook's policy on these matters. But it also shows the limited power of corporate success, for the greater cause of improving all women's lives.

Adding insult to injury, several digital protesters have posted examples of Facebook's answer to the flagging of some of these pictures, in which they explain that - for example - a picture labeled "tape her and rape her" is not offensive according to their policies. Where is Sandberg in all this? And how much of a win for feminism is it to have this corporate climber minister to us in her acquisitive wisdom, while turning a blind eye to such misogynistic practices?

Feminism needs to divorce itself from the shackles of corporate values, in order to meet the needs of all women.
Sheryl Sandberg at World Economic Forum, WikiCommons by By World Economic Forum from Cologny, Switzerland [CC-BY-SA-2.0 ( )], via Wikimedia Commons

- Advertisement -

Amy Fried is the author of "Escaping Dick Cheney's Stomach." She received her Ph.D. in Organizational Behavior, and has been an advocate for church-state separation and other civil liberties issues. She writes on women's issues, media, veganism (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What Erectile Dysfunction Ads Say About Our Culture and Our Health

What Makes a Good Leader?

Why Disability is a Feminist Issue

Confessions of a Junk Food Vegan

Old Enough to be Raped

What Part of "Emergency" Don't You Understand?


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 17 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Newsflash: you can be a feminist and a SAHM @ the ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 4:26:42 PM
has nothing to do with women. It is a corporate ba... by Mark Sashine on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 6:26:35 PM
Yeah, it's an interesting dilemma. Naomi Wolf rece... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Monday, May 27, 2013 at 7:46:00 PM
that  women  are as  much  'me... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 6:59:06 AM
Well, w/o overgeneralizing, I would say that some ... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 11:24:35 AM
 It was inside of some  conext when a pe... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 1:30:21 PM
Mark; the only thing I can find in relation to Jon... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 3:32:19 PM
One day men will express how fed up they are with ... by Bill Johnson on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 1:57:11 PM
Feminism as a "hate group and domestic terrorism a... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 2:14:14 PM
If you both folks agree with me that modern  ... by Mark Sashine on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 2:55:31 PM
It wasn't my intention to tear down the entire ide... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 3:11:14 PM
Excellent point, Amy.Healing duality, in any form,... by Cynthia Piano on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 at 8:57:55 AM
Yes, Mark, unity is the real issue.  The enem... by Cynthia Piano on Wednesday, May 29, 2013 at 9:02:10 AM
Surely man-hating misandrists are smart enough to ... by Bill Johnson on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 2:07:54 PM
Think Progress has updates on the campaign.... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 3:53:42 PM
Facebook has responded.... by Amy Fried, Ph.D. on Tuesday, May 28, 2013 at 4:19:40 PM
For me, FB is a vehicle to "out" everyone but the ... by Cynthia Piano on Thursday, May 30, 2013 at 5:40:25 AM