OpEdNews Op Eds

Sexual Breast Photo Page One New York Times

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
The large Page One photo of the partially bare breast of "a Tel Aviv woman, 28," years old and unnamed, is not only in poor taste and too sexual-sensual, but simply unnecessary and inappropriate for a paper like The New York Times. 

Yes, this is a story in Wednesday's paper about high breast cancer rates in Israel and the photo shows two breasts, one fully covered and the other, partially covered. Part of the surrounding nipple area is showing and a several inch knife cut higher up, along with a tattoo of a Jewish star. close to her shoulder. 

Of course, she is unnamed and her face is cut off in that photo. And, if the clothing had been raised just a tiny, tiny bit, the readers would see just the relevant red scar and the Jewish star, not the lower bit portion of the breast.

What is the point? If this was a sensationalist newspaper or a specially sex-oriented news sheet, I would understand the attempt at the slightly sensational. But, The New York Times prides itself on being professional and particularly when writing a woman's health article. 

Times Public Editor Maureen Sullivan was even prompted to write a column on the controversial photo soon after it appeared. " The photograph is garnering comment in other publications, such as Slate and New York Magazine , and is the subject of plenty of conversation on Twitter." 

That is apparently what The Times wanted!

However, Sullivan quoted  Michele McNally, the assistant managing editor in charge of photography, about why the photograph was chosen and the thinking behind using it.

"It's directly on point to the story," she said. "It conveys a lot of information. It brings the reality to light. It's also very beautiful -- the lighting, the composition, the tone."

But in reading the text of the article, even in part on Page One, shows no rationale whatsoever for this photo. It's not showing cancer distortions or this particular cancerous victim's face in pain. And, indeed in this photo, the woman is unidentified, except for her age and city. 

The obvious reason for this large Page One image is this! It helps create either temporary excitement and chatter, or rabid controversy among the two hundred readers commenting in the web site comments section underneath the article the day it appeared. They included two-sided arguments over whether the photo is appropriate or not. 

A news story, its tasteful photos, its detailed inquiry of the accurate facts, as well as the controversial subject itself, are supposed to create interest among readers and a better understanding of the subject. That should not include an irrelevant, large provocative photo on Page One, leading the paper right underneath the paper's name plate.

 

http://www.birdscrittersbutterflies.webs.com/

Thomas D. Williams, a freelance writer, worked at The Hartford Courant for almost 40 years before retiring in November 2005 to become an investigative freelancer on Internet news sites. He has written a unique nature book, The Spirits of Birds, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sexual Breast Photo Page One New York Times

Critical Complaints About Gulf War Veterans' Illnesses Not Answered

Is Alleged National Security Violator Snowden Alone or Are Federal Officials Similarly Vulnerable?

The Retiring Pope's Cover-up Goes Unreported

The Greedy Rich Control

The Powerful Escape Responsibility

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 10 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Oh for crying out loud. It's just part of a nipple... by Olivia LaRosa on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 2:49:38 PM
Please note the lengths I've gone to conceal my ma... by paulvcassidy on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:13:12 PM
Olivia! This story and the controversy is about CA... by Dennie Williams on Tuesday, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:52:47 AM
I agree Olivia, if the Times really wants to "conv... by laurie steele on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 4:58:00 PM
I am a certified Dirty Old Man (and a self proclai... by Doc McCoy on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 6:21:02 PM
Thanks for the link. Got it now. Yea breast cancer... by paulvcassidy on Tuesday, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:18:10 AM
ah hahaha!... by laurie steele on Tuesday, Dec 3, 2013 at 12:25:39 PM
 Only a boob would waste the time it takes to... by Howard Lewis on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:59:18 PM
Uh....how did the image of this Front Page get lef... by John Jonik on Monday, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:16:03 PM
I agree.... by Mahalingam Santhri N on Tuesday, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:53:19 AM