Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

General News

Sequester Dirties the Air

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 3/16/13

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -

The sequester is here. As I outlined in a previous article exactly what we had to look forward to, indiscriminate cuts are being unleashed upon the public straight across the board, delivered with a hatchet as opposed to a scalpel.

I reached out to Sen. Tom Carper, who serves on the Environment and Public Works Committee, for a comment on the current situation. He responded by e-mail stating:

"Programs in every corner of the federal government are taking a hit because of sequestration. Because the President and those of us in Congress failed to compromise in addressing our deep fiscal challenges, we've enacted indiscriminate cuts without asking whether they'll hurt our economy or undermine the basic responsibilities of government, including preserving our environment and protecting public health. Unfortunately, these cuts weren't conceived thoughtfully and weren't targeted toward inefficient or wasteful programs. Thus, they could slow our momentum in valuable programs aimed at cleaning up our dirty air, which contributes to pulmonary disease in countless Americans, young and old, each year. Going forward, I'll continue to call for a comprehensive deficit reduction plan that is balanced, fair and thoughtful ."

The average American may not be aware of how these cuts will impact the air that they breathe. Perhaps, most surprising to them, would be how the affected programs that reduce air pollution will shape the state of national health for everyone. Those at greatest harm are the vulnerable elderly, young children, and those with cardiac and respiratory diseases.

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/83473478@N03/8537867660/
by melissgodk

Here are some of the top concerns that were laid out by the Environment Protection Agency in a February letter from Lisa Jackson to Sen. Barbara Mikulski, the Chairwoman for the Committee on Appropriations.

State Air Monitors:

Sequestration cuts reduce EPA funding allocated to individual states to monitor air quality. Critical air monitoring sites may be shuttered. As a result, there will be no monitoring of certain pollutants such as fine particle (soot) and ozone. Without this data, it is impossible to ascertain whether a specific locale is in compliance with Clean Air Act (CAA) standards.

- Advertisement -

An example of a system in danger of losing funding is AIRNow, an index for reporting daily air quality. These advisories are essential for those who need to judge the advisability of going outdoors.

 

Vehicle Certification:

Cuts will impact the EPA's ability to evaluate and certify that new cars are in compliance with emission standards. The trickle down effect is that it stalls automobile purchases, and therefore, the economy.

Energy Star Program:

- Advertisement -

Most Americans are familiar with the Energy Star tag on new appliances. The facts listed give companies tools to set goals, and consumers disclosure and details on energy usage and emissions. In 2011, because of these insights, American utility bills were lowered by $23 billion. The reduced emissions in 2011 were equivalent to that of 41 million vehicles.

Superfund Enforcement:

This is a system for monitoring accountability of those responsible for the costly "cleanups" at pollution sites. It ensures that those at fault are footing the bill. An EPA failure to follow through on keeping offenders accountable is estimated to amount to a loss of $100 million in fee revenues to the government. For example, announced in December 2012, was the Owens-Brockway Glass Container settlement. The largest glass container manufacturer in the country agreed to "install pollution control equipment to reduce harmful emissions of nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter by nearly 2,500 tons per year." Their fine will be a $1.45 million penalty to resolve alleged Clean Air Act violations at five of the company's manufacturing plants.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.mgyerman.com

Marcia G. Yerman is a writer, activist, artist and curator based in New York City. Her articles--profiles, interviews, reporting and essays--focus on women's issues, the environment, human rights, the arts and culture. Her writing has been published (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Keystone Pipeline Is An Environmental Justice Issue

"ExxonMobil Hates Your Children" and This Ad

New EPA Chief Gina McCarthy Targets Climate Change

Urge Pepsi To Stop Guzzling Tar Sands!

"Homeland" Probes Terrorism and the Existential Threat

Virginia's Wayne Powell: An Environmental Profile In Courage

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Across the board cuts will not only affect the air... by Marcia G. Yerman on Saturday, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:06:50 PM