Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 5 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 8 (13 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   11 comments, 6 series

Life Arts

Scholastic and Big Coal Team Up to Bamboozle 4th Graders

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 4/24/14

Become a Fan
  (70 fans)


(image by David McLimans for RethinkingSchools.org)

My guest today is Bill Bigelow, curriculum editor of Rethinking Schools magazine. Welcome to OpEdNews, Bill. I read in the latest issue of YES! Magazine that you have been involved in an effort to change policy at Scholastic Inc. I may be dating myself but isn't Scholastic the publisher of the fabulous Magic School Bus series that my kids enjoyed so much when they were growing up? What could a children's book publisher possibly do to get itself into hot water?

Joan, exactly. I loved Scholastic books growing up. At my elementary school in California, the bookmobile would regularly show up and we'd fill out little forms asking our parents to buy copies of books like The Wit and Wisdom of Abraham Lincoln. So I was stunned to learn that Scholastic had partnered with the American Coal Foundation to produce a propagandistic 4th grade curriculum singing the praises of coal, and including not one word about its problems. Let's remember that coal is the single greatest contributor to climate-wrecking carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Mountaintop removal coal mining in Appalachia has destroyed 500 mountains. 

Burning coal spews mercury into the environment, and on and on. And Scholastic had distributed the curriculum to tens of thousands of elementary teachers around the country. So learning all this is what made me want to alert other educators, parents, child advocates, and environmentalists to what Scholastic was up to.

It's exactly that stellar reputation which Scholastic has enjoyed over the years that must have been a major enticement for Big Coal to use them for their own purposes.  Was there any disclaimer included with the material? What are the ethics of such a situation?

No. No disclaimer. Just the opposite. Scholastic's logo was prominently displayed on the curriculum. I found a blog post from Alma Paty, the director of the American Coal Foundation, saying that the reason they partnered with Scholastic was because "Four out of five parents know and trust the Scholastic brand." Are there ethical problems with hiring out your expertise and reputation to the most polluting industry in the world? I think there are. 

Scholastic is invited into schools based on educators' assumption that Scholastic is trying to offer engaging, fair-minded curriculum. Instead, Scholastic was operating as a hired gun for Big Coal. And, it turns out, that through its In-School Marketing program, this is a part of what Scholastic does: hires out its curricular expertise and good name to corporations of all kinds. I found another curriculum on energy issues that Scholastic produced for the Institute for 21st Century Energy of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which aggressively promotes fossil fuel production along with the removal of government regulation of the energy industry. Scholastic now claims that it is more selective about who it partners with.

Clearly, Scholastic wasn't duped into doing what it's been doing. So, armed with your discoveries,  what did you do? I know you didn't just throw up your hands and say "Oh, well, I guess that's the way it is".   

I wrote a critique of the Scholastic curriculum for Rethinking Schools magazine. But before it was published, I decided to contact the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood to see if they wanted to partner with Rethinking Schools to reach out to environmental organizations and pressure Scholastic to withdraw its curriculum. By the time we were ready to go public with our critique and demand that Scholastic sever ties with the coal industry, we had been joined by Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace USA, and the Center for Biological Diversity. This was in May 2011. Josh Golin at Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood contacted a reporter, Tamar Lewin, at the New York Times, who he'd had contact with around previous campaigns. She wrote an article that reported on what we had discovered about Scholastic's biased curriculum. In the meantime, we had generated hundreds of letters to Scholastic. The week ended with a New York Times editorial blasting Scholastic for its poor judgment in abusing the public trust by distributing such a one-sided collection of lessons.

I like that you built a viable coalition before you went after Scholastic. Was that difficult to pull off? And with all those voices behind you, how did it go?

In the long run, if we are going to create a curriculum that is alert to the enormity of the environmental crisis and that attempts to help students see themselves as people who can effect change, educators are going to need allies beyond the schools. The climate crisis is arguably the most significant challenge facing humanity, and yet the official curriculum is awful. Here in Oregon, one of the most widely used textbooks on global studies, Holt McDougal's Modern World History, includes three terrible paragraphs on the climate crisis. This is the textbook for the only required course in high school that looks at the state of the world. Educators have to reach out to people in the environmental movement so that together we can demand a curriculum that encourages students to think deeply about the economic system that has put us in the predicament that we're in -- and to imagine alternatives. To answer your question more directly: No, it was not so hard to get environmental groups to demand that Scholastic stop distributing pro-coal propaganda. But we are going to have to do a better job of having educator-activist conversations about the nature of the curriculum and what we ought to do about it.


Bill Bigelow
(image by Barbara Miner)


Agreed. And we don't have endless time to bring that curriculum change about. Where do things stand with Scholastic? Have they realized the error of their ways or will they continue to prostitute their good name for money driven by a hidden corporate agenda?

The campaign alerting the world to Scholastic's pro-coal propaganda generated a wave of negative publicity for Scholastic. CNN, Time, Mother Jones, Huffington Post, countless blogs " and then, as I say, the damning editorial from the New York Times. By the end of the week, Scholastic decided to cut their losses. They publicly apologized for their lapse in judgment in teaming with Big Coal. They agreed to pull the United States of Energy curriculum off its website and to end its distribution of the curriculum. Scholastic promised a review of its In School Marketing program. I haven't monitored Scholastic closely since then, but they did comply with their promise not to distribute the coal curriculum. 

Later, they pulled down the terrible and manipulative energy curriculum they had written for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. The encouraging thing about this whole campaign is that it shows that when educators, child advocates, and environmentalists focus attention on the curriculum, we can make a huge difference. What we need to remember, though, is that Scholastic's curricular cheerleading for coal is just the tip of the iceberg. It's not an exaggeration to say that pretty much the entire official curriculum shows contempt for the Earth. But there are also encouraging signs. Here in Portland, Sunnyside Environmental School, a public school in Southeast Portland, has sponsored week-long teach-ins on energy issues and climate change. They bring in scientists, activists, and educators from around the region, and engage students in intensive inquiry what's happening to our planet and what we can do. I participated in the last one of these and it was inspiring. Students were incredibly concerned and eager to take action. It feels to me that interest in this kind of critical, environmentally aware curriculum is growing.

That is encouraging. Anything you'd like to add before we wrap this up?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 people are discussing this page, with 11 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

OMG! First Santa, then the Easter Bunny, and now w... by Meryl Ann Butler on Thursday, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:01:09 PM
I was really disappointed. I REALLY loved Magic Sc... by Joan Brunwasser on Thursday, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:00:00 PM
OMG is right. So good to know that the earth and t... by Amy Schreiner on Thursday, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:08:19 PM
Agreed, Amy.That's why I jumped on this story. Act... by Joan Brunwasser on Thursday, Apr 24, 2014 at 11:01:14 PM
      We're gonna wreck t... by William Crain on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:36:21 AM
Amen. ... by Joan Brunwasser on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:25:08 AM
This great article exposes the depths and comprehe... by Rob Kall on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:41:53 AM
Thanks for writing, Rob. Add to your comment an un... by Joan Brunwasser on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:19:18 AM
At least Activism worked in this case.  A goo... by Scott Baker on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:14:36 AM
WWHPT??He would think: "I could swear on my Quiddi... by Meryl Ann Butler on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 12:35:57 PM
I dumped Time for Kids the year they didn't even m... by Daniel Geery on Friday, Apr 25, 2014 at 11:38:17 AM