Tag(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats

Schadenfreude, Zeitgeist and a sizzling Triumph TR8

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (11 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com

In the late-70s I had a very dear friend who purchased one of the hottest ever designed cars: a Triumph TR8; the most popular automobiles by British Leyland, it was advertised as "the shape of things to come." The downfall of the vehicle, however, was the fact that, beneath its beautiful skin, it was a piece of junk. Its styling and performance could dazzle any bystander  . . . for a while. The "while" translated as not lasting especially long, and spending inordinate time in the repair shop. In modern argot, it was "high maintenance."

 

A full six months ago I posted Democrats Worst Nightmare.

 

 Don't tell me, I know it now, I knew it at the time: a little, okay, a lot of hyperbole. It was a title, a headline intended to pique sufficient curiosity that would get it read.

_

In "Nightmare," I proposed that Alaska Governor Sarah Palin was not only the most logical VP pick to stand alongside John McCain, she was also the best lance into the heart of whoever would end up as the Democratic presidential candidate.   

_

Essentially, I was landing on the proposition from two distinct and unrelated perspectives. Let's take a look at them. But first, let's take a look at the country and at John McCain.

 

Zeitgeist refers to the general personality of a population. America's is one of turbulence; a thorough disgust of the present state of affairs. We are fed up past the gills with the direction in which the country is headed because we are fed up past the gills with where we have been for at least the past nearly eight years, and likely even longer. Although we're not sure as to the specific definition of "change," we sure don't want what has been past and what is present to be continued as our future. More of the same, as an offering, will be rejected outright. The contest for the Democratic nomination between an African-American and a woman, and the enthusiasm generated, proved that point beyond any question whatsoever!   

 

The Arizona senator's life history, from early childhood through the present is one that is typified by temper tantrums laced with the most prolific profanity-saturated tirades that are directed both obliquely at some indistinct target and most exquisitely at those who (seem to) cross him. In effect, it's a form of bullying, which itself draws entirely from a very real, deep seated sense of emotional insecurity. He needs to launch preemptive attacks lest he - his position, statement, claim, etc. - be shown as erroneous, inapposite, whatever. McCain takes, as he has from childhood, suggestions and the presentation of evidence, that he may not be right as lethal, personal attacks pointed directly at him; "him" in this instance being his ego, his personal worth, his very sense of self esteem. Those who might inveigh against him are internalized as potential threats that must be dispatched by whatever means, but by means that will not also result in the threat or realization of personal peril.

That is John Sidney McCain III.

 

McCain's apparent choices consisted of Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman, Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee, Minnesota Governor Tim Pawlenty, North Carolina Senator Elizabeth Dole, Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, and Florida Governor Charlie Crist.

 

The conundrum for McCain was finding someone who was sufficiently youthful to offset the age issue, who would be acceptable to the far-Right conservative GOP base, who was not a longtime Washington insider, who would not overshadow him either intellectually or whose stage dynamism put him in the background, and who could seem to fill that Zeitgeist thing.

 

Lieberman wouldn't work because of his liberal background and the fact he wasn't, nor would he ever become, sufficiently Republican. Romney, Giuliani, and Huckabee were heads above McCain intellectually and charismatically, and not a one of them would stand for a moment being subject to McCain's lies and profane outbursts. Pawlenty, as a white male, brought nothing to the table. There was nothing that McCain could bring to Crist that the extraordinarily popular Florida governor - without any of the likely grief that McCain would likely heap in his path - wasn't going to have in his own right. And Dole and Hutchison, while the right gender, were so old time establishment that their presence on the ticket would easily be seen for what it was: pandering to the XX chromosome voters. Besides, in the case of Dole, next to her highly revered iconic husband, Kansas Senator Bob Dole, McCain was a boorish midget.

 

The only choice available thus was that of Palin: right gender, completely supplicating to McCain, has the perfect ultra-conservative background and orientation for the GOP base, has that mysterious, unquantifiable quality of magnetic screen presence. Her only stark negatives - lack of name recognition, a thin veneer of executive experience, and ignorance of domestic economic and international issues - could be, like the Wizard of Oz, hidden behind the curtain through effective controls and marketing. Sarah Palin wouldn't be that much different than my friend's TR8.     

 

Perhaps the unvarnished facts of the matter are indeed that Sarah Palin might be little more than a bright, shiny, high performance sports car for John McCain, one whose exterior belies serious defects and deficiencies beneath the superficial skin. Nonetheless, to a voting public that has rarely, if ever, looked beneath superficialities, it would be a serious, even lethal, misstep for us to underestimate the potency of those qualities.

 

The debate between Palin and Biden last evening. Those of us who are in full support of the Obama-Biden ticket can dance and joke and sing all we wish about what truly is the absurdity of Sarah Palin as vice-president. And we can call her on her missteps, misstatements and the scripted talking points she parroted. Schadenfreud is the taking of pleasure in the misforturne of others. We can do that . . .

Next Page  1  |  2

 

An "Old Army Vet" and liberal, qua liberal, with a passion for open inquiry in a neverending quest for truth unpoisoned by religious superstitions. Per Voltaire: "He who can lead you to believe an absurdity can lead you to commit an atrocity."

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments