It was hard not to watch the latest Romney / Obama debate and not
feel chills go up your spine. Romney didn't deny ANY (Emphasis Warranted) of the accusations
Obama threw his way. There is a CLEAR difference between the
candidates. Either you want to work for peace and support war as a last
resort, or you're a neocon chicken hawk. Let us count the top five
ways they were different:
1. Romney has been
endorsed and supported by DICK CHENEY, the man behind the curtain, and
didn't distance himself when given the opportunity to do so in the
debate. His closest foriegn policy advisors are the SAME people who
trumpted the war in Iraq and WMD. How is he not embarrassed by the
association?
2. Romney attended FUNDRAISERS while traveling
abroad while Obama visted the HOLOCAUST MUSEUM. What does this say
about the two men's characters? A lot. Obama is sincere while Romney
is kissing up.
3.
Romney DOESN'T KNOW how a military is run and thinks bigger and more is
always better as evidenced by his comment on the size of the U.S. Navy
and Obama's brilliant response. Your horse and bayonet are calling you
Romney.
4. Romney DIDN'T DENY or distance himself from having
invested in Chinese companies that do business with IRAN. Is there
anything he WON'T do to make a money? Has he no shame?
5.
Romney DIDN'T DENY that he said he'd ask for Pakistan's permission
before trying to kill Osama Bin Laden. This was the best and hardest
decision of Obama's presidency and Romney failed before he ever had the
chance. If Romney was elected in 2008, Osama Bin Laden would be alive
today.
1
1
1
