Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Save Our Corporations from the Crash -- Senna, Smith, Marx and Rules

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 5/26/14

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)
- Advertisement -


Ayrton Senna Headstone
(image by Wikimedia Commons)
  DMCA

On May 1, 1994, Ayrton Senna died in a horrific crash during the San Marino Gran Prix -- a racing incident with nobody to blame. In that year, Formula One racing consisted of fourteen teams, and none of the team owners or managers wished harm upon their drivers. But competition, mixed with technology, can be a deadly combination. Speed drove the teams' development efforts, and safety was a secondary consideration. They couldn't help themselves. Teams knew that diverting resources to safety would render them uncompetitive; they were trapped in a deadly quest for speed. To save the lives of their drivers, they needed outside help.

That help came in the form of increased regulation by FiA, the governing body of Formula One racing. F1 Supremo Bernie Ecclestone sought advice from teams, drivers, engineers, and Dr. Sid Watkins. Within a season, new rules governing fuel containment, driver protection, crashworthiness, track design, and medical evacuation plans were implemented. Today, the quest for speed goes on within a finite structure of safety regulation. Although spectacular crashes still occur at a pulse-quickening rate, the last fatality of F1 remains to this day that of Ayrton Senna in 1994. Who is better off for this regulation? Drivers, of course, as well as the teams and the sport as a whole.

Today's corporate environment is no less competitive than F1 racing. Technology has sharpened competition by arming it with rapid product cycles, access to global financial markets, unprecedented demographic marketing information, and decision modeling capabilities that demand quick and decisive implementation of strategies -- no matter what the cost to society, markets, or the environment. Each corporate contender must use all of the competitive resources available to it, or risk losing out to those which do and paying the ultimate price of business failure. Corporations, like F1 teams, can't help themselves -- they are trapped in a deadly quest for survival and profits. And to save society, the environment, and themselves, they need outside help.


Economists at Odds - Smith and Marx
(image by Wikimedia Commons)
  DMCA
- Advertisement -

Adam Smith imagined an invisible hand of market demand that could temper the voracious appetites of suppliers; perhaps he did not appreciate the degree to which supplier power could be concentrated. Karl Marx predicted that private capital -- corporate wealth today -- would become so dominant that it would burn itself out in a revolutionary conflagration; perhaps he did not appreciate the regulatory potential of a powerful democracy.

Concentrated capital is its own worst enemy, and that of its host society. In order to fortify Smith's invisible hand, and to avoid Marx's revolution, permanent and consistent regulation is required. Markets that are free from monopoly, oligarchy, and extreme concentration are good for society, the environment, and even business enterprise. Free markets require rules that prevent unsafe competitive practices such as deceptive advertising, marketing hazardous products, pumping emissions into the air and water, exploitative labor practices, predatory pricing policies, colluding with competitors, forming trusts to restrain trade -- and perhaps the most damaging practice of all: tainting the legislative, regulatory, and enforcement processes with the coercion of unmatched volumes of money and power.

Individual corporations and industries fear the regulatory potential of a powerful democracy. Compliance can be expensive, and always restricts the strategic options available. So regulation will always be vigorously resisted -- corporations just can't help themselves. Like each F1 team, each corporation and industry must compete with every weapon at its disposal, and will consider any restriction to be a threat to its very survival. Consequently, industry has a history of rigging the structure of public policy to its advantage. This is reflected in a tax code that subsidizes capital, cutbacks in any government spending that threatens to raise corporate taxes, banking regulation rollbacks, and today's attempts to defund regulatory agencies like the EPA and FTC. And yet, the regulatory potential of a powerful democracy may be the only thing that stands between corporations and their own destruction.

If we are to save American industry from itself, we must first reclaim our democracy for the people. Start with a constitutional amendment, if necessary, to rectify the damage done by Citizens United and McCutcheon. Then reform federal elections with carefully-allocated public funding. Then, and only then, we can pursue real reform to create a level competitive playing field within the economy. This will require fundamental tax reform and careful regulation of business and industry. And don't count on getting any help from corporations, because they are too immersed in looking after their own short-term interests; they just can't help themselves.

- Advertisement -

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Limit corporate power via constitutional amendment

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Years ago I made a decision to commit to a life of business management. Kids do the dumbest things! After thirty five years as a small business consultant, CFO, and university educator specializing in quantitative business and economic (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Myth of Liberal Media Bias

Social Darwinism and Fox Republicans

Myth #17: We're Number One!

Lies, Obamacare, and Damn Lies

Fixing Income Inequality

THE CAIN PLAN -- ANOTHER TROJAN HORSE

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

They just can't help themselves. So simple a state... by Steven Grove on Monday, May 26, 2014 at 11:10:36 AM
Thanks, very valuable. ... by BFalcon on Monday, May 26, 2014 at 2:04:11 PM
Great analogy between F1 racing and corporate capi... by Derryl Hermanutz on Monday, May 26, 2014 at 4:20:56 PM
Very true! Thanks for this piece. C orporations ca... by Solomon Appiah on Saturday, Jun 7, 2014 at 2:45:54 PM