Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

SOS: Framing the Climate Protection Act Now

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 2   Must Read 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 1/17/14

Become a Fan
  (11 fans)
- Advertisement -

From http://www.flickr.com/photos/44124483743@N01/11505089634/: Capitol at Solstice Sunset shows the place where this bill has to win!
Capitol at Solstice Sunset shows the place where this bill has to win!
(image by brownpau)
  DMCA


SOS: Framing the Climate Protection Act Now


by Susan C. Strong


Senators Boxer and Sanders are now back on track promoting their Climate Protection Act (see http://m.sfgate.com/... ), and I am happy to note that they describe what companies would pay as a carbon "fee," not a "tax." After all, it's a "pay to play" situation for business, and that is the definition of a "fee," not a tax. The primary goal of the fee is to raise the price of carbon, not to raise money in the way a tax does. In fact, we'd better not get dependent on funds raised by carbon fees, because in the end we want those fees to become unnecessary as the U.S. moves to a truly sustainable energy economy. And I don't have to tell my MP Network readers that calling a thing a "tax" means it will be DOA in D.C. We simply cannot afford that kind of framing disaster now.

The bill also specifies that a lot of the money raised by fees will be returned to the public, as energy prices inevitably rise. What to call those returned funds? On this point there has been another very unfortunate, persistent framing error in some sectors of the climate action movement and the media. That mistake has been calling the funds to be returned a "dividend." That's a 1% word, friends, and the choice of it is based on a faulty analogy with the situation in Alaska. There, the name for money returned to state residents from selling Alaskan oil is called a "dividend." This makes sense in Alaska, because the oil is a state resource, and thus the common property of all Alaska residents.

- Advertisement -

But a federal carbon fee is very different from the sale of oil! The payback to citizens is also very different. It's about making amends to individual American citizens for the price they will pay for carbon-based energy after the fee is in place.  The frame used to describe those "amends" must be something everyone can understand. We can be sure that the climate change deniers will use every hook we unwittingly offer them to sabotage the Climate Protection Act. So what frame do I suggest?  I think "rebate" is a far better choice, because that is a term familiar to the mainstream public. It suggests getting a break on the price of something. That is exactly what the bill means to offer to the public.

So I beg of you, all of you: listen to my warnings and suggestions about framing this bill! Our climate crisis is worsening every day. We must do everything we can to protect our planetary ecosystem, our own species and the other forms of life here. That also means talking about remedies in a way that works for all. Even our hope for peaceful resolution of climate change conflict depends on good framing. Say it wrong, and things will definitely go wrong! Say it the best way, and we might just "save our planet."

Susan C. Strong, Ph.D., is the Founder and Executive Director of The Metaphor Project, http://www.metaphorproject.org ,   and author of our new book, Move Our Message: How to Get America's Ear.   The Metaphor Project has been helping progressives mainstream their messages since 1997. Follow Susan on Twitter @SusanCStrong.

-----------------------------------------------------------

- Advertisement -

 

http://www.metaphorproject.org

Susan C. Strong, Ph.D., is the founder and executive director of the Metaphor Project. She is also the author of our new book, MOVE OUR MESSAGE: HOW TO GET AMERICA'S EAR, available on our website. The mission of the Metaphor Project is helping (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Reframing Climate Change Now

Countering the GOP "Sabotage America" Campaign

Framing Climate Change Action Now: Advice, Slogans, & the "Necessity" Frame

Counter-frame It! How to Stop Using Their Words

Tell the Media Again: Say "Safety," not "Control!"

Protect the 99% Right Now!

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Right now Senator Boxer and others are starting a ... by Susan Strong on Friday, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:55:29 AM
I've been saying this for months.  "Tax" is a... by Theodora B Crawford on Friday, Jan 17, 2014 at 3:45:52 PM
Thanks, Theodora! Please send the link for this pi... by Susan Strong on Saturday, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:34:39 AM