Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 5/2/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (3 comments)

SB1070 -- The Joe Arpaio Racial Profiling Protection Act

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Let's cut through the clutter surrounding Arizona's new law -- it is intended to end lawsuits by victims of racial profiling. While, Arizona is the current hole in the border fence (before that it was California, before that Texas) that fact has nothing to do with the passage of the law.

The law is crafted to shield the Maricopa County Sheriff's office and its self-promoting Sheriff Joe Arpaio. This department has been sued over 2,700 times since 2004, according to the Phoenix New Times. Poor Joe gets sued almost every day. And the judge in a current racial profiling lawsuit caught Arpaio's department destroying relevant evidence. So the law seeks to redefine skin-targeting by the sheriff and his ordered-to-profile deputies as "reasonable suspicion" while still retaining the pretense that racial profiling is something else. What better solution to Arpaio's problem than legally mandating his tactics?

(Another traditional Arpaio target is Native Americans. They are five percent of Arizonans -- but thanks to casino money they can now hire those pesky, hotshot attorneys.)

Here are two facts you ought to know about the arguments being made by Arizona's governor: Like the rest of the country and like the other border states -- crime rates in Arizona have been declining for years. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics Arizona's violent crime rate is the lowest since 1983. Property crime rates are the lowest since 1968. And the number of illegal immigrants in the US has declined almost fourteen percent since 2007.

Arpaio's unseemly relationship with the Mexican complexion is hardly new. When I lived in Tucson and Phoenix in the early 80s he was already well known for abuses. But two things have changed. First, Mexican Americans have come out of the shadows, and are now a thirty percent of Arizona citizens. They won't be abused by the likes of Arpaio and simply take it. And second, the sinking Arizona economy made kicking out the Mexicans popular, once again. During every boom, border state employers actively recruit cheap labor in Mexico. During every downturn, they send them packing once again.

So if all the justifications for the law are simply made up, what's left? Protecting Joe Arpaio from the laws that are meant to protect the rest of us from him. That's what.

 

Jimmy Zuma writes the online political journal Smart v. Stupid. He also writes a weekly column for the Tucson Sentinel under the same title, and a weekly feature, DC Water Cooler, for Technorati. His beat is national politics.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Thanks for the story by Richard Pietrasz on Sunday, May 2, 2010 at 6:49:29 PM
What do you propose by sommers on Sunday, May 2, 2010 at 7:43:03 PM
What do you propose? Glad you asked... by Jimmy Zuma on Sunday, May 2, 2010 at 8:06:42 PM