Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Ryan's Regressiveness Redux

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 3/11/13

Become a Fan
  (106 fans)
- Advertisement -

Republicans lost the election but they still shape what's debated in Washington -- the federal budget deficit and so-called "fiscal responsibility."

The White House's and the Democrat's continuing failure to reshape that debate has lead directly and logically to Paul Ryan's budget plan this week, which is a more regressive version of the same plan American voters resoundingly rejected last November. 

Sadly, the President is playing into the GOP's hands with a new round of negotiations over a "grand bargain."

Despite February's encouraging job numbers, the major challenge is still jobs, wages, growth, and widening inequality -- not deficit reduction and fiscal responsibility. 

We'd need numbers like February's every month for the next four years to get anywhere close to the level of unemployment we had before the Great Recession. But we won't get there because of the austerity policies the nation has embarked on, and the continuing erosion of the middle class. 

- Advertisement -

Austerity economics -- of which Ryan's upcoming budget is the most extreme version -- is a cruel hoax. Cruel because it hurts most those who are already hurting; a hoax because it doesn't work. 

The entire framework is based on the false analogy that the federal budget is akin to a family's budget. 

Families do have to balance their budgets. But that's precisely why the federal government has to be the spender of last resort when consumer spending falls short of boosting the economy toward full employment.

And as long as income and wealth continue to concentrate at the very top, the broad middle class and those aspiring to join it won't have the purchasing power to boost the economy. 

So why even try for a "grand bargain" that won't deal with these fundamentals but only further legitimize the GOP mythology and further mislead the public about what's really at stake? 

- Advertisement -

Robert Reich, former U.S. Secretary of Labor and Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley, has a new film, "Inequality for All," to be released September 27. He blogs at

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Republican's Big Lies About Jobs (And Why Obama Must Repudiate Them)

Paul Ryan Still Doesn't Get It

What Mitt Romney Really Represents

The Minimum Wage, Guns, Healthcare, and the Meaning of a Decent Society

Why the Right-Wing Bullies Will Hold The Nation Hostage Again and Again

The Gas Wars


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

The only reason the President and some of the Demo... by Elizabeth Hanson on Monday, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:45:35 PM
Given today's reports that the attacks in Afghanis... by manifesto 2000 on Tuesday, Mar 12, 2013 at 12:48:59 AM