OpEdNews Op Eds

Rush Limbaugh: Not the Only One with First Amendment Rights

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (7 fans)
Rush Limbaugh does it again...  and of course it comes as no surprise. 


Limbaugh's Mug Shot by Public domain


This time he targeted Sandra Fluke, the third year Georgetown Law student who was denied an opportunity to speak to a key all male Republican committee (headed by indicted car thief Darrel Issa ) about the need for women to have access to contraception.

Rush raged that since Fluke wants to require employer based health insurance policies to cover birth control,    she is a "slut" and worse.  He somehow equates getting health coverage for birth control with getting paid to have sex, and then argues that Fluke wants taxpayers to pay her to have sex, and she should post videos of herself having sex so taxpayers will know what they are getting for their money.  Hmmn, what great "conservative" thinking that is. 

The taxpayer argument?  Tut, tut, tut.  You wonder if he really believes this stuff himself.  America's Anchorman, as Rush advertises himself, is again trying to scare people about a complete nonstarter.  But frightening people with misinformation is what he does, three hours a day, five days a week, to 20 million listeners across the country.  Whoring himself out with lies in order to gain ratings. 

This time, he is facing some pushback.  Groups across the country are urging a boycott of Limbaugh  The mattress giant Sleep Train has already pulled its ads in the wake of the Fluke comments, and the group is pressuring Pro Flowers to stop advertising as well.  The National Organization for Women is also calling on Clear Channel to lose Limbaugh.  These are good measures, but not good enough.

Rush targets women all the time (including yours truly,) but broadcasters like Clear Channel who put him on hundreds of stations nationwide and profit handsomely insist no matter how vile his comments, he enjoys "freedom of speech."  

True.  But Clear Channel is effectively denying the rest of us OUR freedom of speech on our public airwaves, something which is expressly forbidden by the United States Supreme Court.   From RedLion Broadcasting v FCC, "The First Amendment does not protect private censorship by broadcasters who are licensed by the Government to use a scarce resource which is denied to others."

People like Sandra Fluke (and frankly anyone who has a non-right wing agenda,) are routinely denied access to the microphones on our public airwaves.  That is private censorship, and it needs to stop. It is bad for the individuals being unfairly attacked, it is bad for society, and it is bad for democracy.

It is past time for We the People to demand we ALL enjoy our first amendment rights on the radio airwaves which we own (and which the corporations only borrow.)

 

http://www.suewilsonreports.com/

Sue Wilson tells important stories which move politicians to act. The Emmy winning director of the media reform documentary "Broadcast Blues" and editor of SueWilsonReports.com, Sue recently founded the Media Action Center. Wilson was 1987's (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Right Wing Hit Media 400: "Disabling Journalism to Destroy Progressive Thought"

Why We Occupy Clear Channel

Putting Talk Radio on Trial at the FCC

Rush Limbaugh: Not the Only One with First Amendment Rights

When Radio Lies, Our Culture Dies

Standing Up in Wisconsin and Beyond for Our Rights in Radio!

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
5 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

It is true the 1st Amendment gives one the freedom... by Dennis Kaiser on Sunday, Mar 4, 2012 at 6:20:08 AM
Hi, Dennis,I hope Sandra Fluke sues Limbaugh over ... by Sue Wilson on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 12:22:00 PM
I doubt Clear Channel would deny a microphone to a... by Natalie Oberman on Tuesday, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:19:00 PM
Natalie, You are incorrect. Several liberals ... by Andrew Rogers on Friday, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:16:01 AM
I believe it's you who is incorrect.  These r... by Natalie Oberman on Saturday, Mar 10, 2012 at 12:58:50 PM
I am NOT a Rush FAN!!! I personally can't stand t... by catherine diamond on Tuesday, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:40:40 PM
You are so right.  This is a Free Speech Issu... by Sue Wilson on Thursday, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:35:55 PM
This attack on Free Speech  started with Hal ... by catherine diamond on Monday, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:15:18 PM