Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 5 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 11 (18 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Romney & Co. Distort Medicare Realities

By       Message Walter Brasch     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 10/17/12

Become a Fan
  (52 fans)
- Advertisement -


by Walter Brasch

Several times during the first presidential debate, Mitt Romney claimed President Obama had stolen $716 billion from Medicare to fund the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare.

That claim wasn't original with Romney. Thousands of Republican candidates have said the same thing. And, thousands of Republican candidates are wrong. Most know the facts. But in their zealous attempt to spin the truth and get senior citizen votes, they still use that $716 billion claim as fact.

Here are the facts.  

Over a 10 year period--that's 10 years not immediately, as stated--Medicare will lose $716 billion. But, that's primarily because of two provisions of the new law, found to be constitutional by the Supreme Court of the United States.

First, Obamacare reduces excessive payments to hospitals and other medical providers over that 10 year period. Second, and most important, it reduces payments to hospitals that have an excessive number of readmissions.

This forces hospitals to deal with patient issues before releasing the patients. Over the next year, you will see hospital staffs spending more time with patients, and more time trying to coordinate care to avoid having patients return--some for three or four times--to take care of issues that should have been handled before their first discharge. No money is taken from individuals.

- Advertisement -

But, this phony argument by Romney wasn't the only one he made. He claimed a board will determine what treatment patients can receive. This is blatantly wrong. A board does exist, but it exists to review costs by medical providers and, again, to examine high readmission rates and to recommend ways to lower costs. Grandma won't be denied health care because of some governmental board.

Finally, of the couple of dozen errors and lies Romney made in the debate, many not challenged by the President at the time, Romney claims his own plan--an alternate to Obamacare--allows anyone with a pre-existing condition to be able to receive insurance. That's only if the person has a gap of insurance coverage of less than 63 days in the previous 18 months. And, that's not Romney's plan, that's already in the law.

The new law, under President Obama, requires insurance coverage for pre-existing conditions. Period. No exceptions. It ends the cherry-picking by insurance companies that accept only low-risk patients. Persons who do not have employer-sponsored insurance coverage or who have been laid off and can't afford coverage for several months can't be denied insurance protection.

Here's some more facts about Obamacare that are either not mentioned or deliberately distorted by the Republican UnTruth Machine and the propagandists of right-wing talk radio.

Obamacare is not a government take-over of health care, primarily because it still places insurance coverage in the hands of private businesses and insurance companies. It does, however, allow more persons to be insured who are below the poverty line.

- Advertisement -

Currently, about 50 million people do not carry health insurance. Most are unable to afford it. Under Obamacare, they will have insurance coverage.

The new law adds and improves community health centers, allowing low-income persons to be treated in their own micro-communities. Having community health centers in place also increases the probability that those who need medical assistance will receive it. Physicians may still decline to treat persons who are on Medicare, for example, but the impoverished and the low-income elderly won't be turned away.

The new plan also allows more preventative treatment, something that many insurance companies currently don't allow. As dozens of studies have shown, preventative medicine reduces not only mortality but costs as well.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Walter Brasch is an award-winning journalist and professor of journalism emeritus. His current books are Before the First Snow: Stories from the Revolution , America's Unpatriotic Acts: The Federal Government's Violation of (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Twelve Angry White People: Jury Nullification in a Pennsylvania Coal Town

Baffled, Befuddled, and Bamboozled: Penn State Trustees and NCAA are Sinking

Truckin' to Treason: The Hot Air of Secession

Former OEN Managing Editor Files Lawsuit Against Philly Police, City. Charge: Constitutional Violations in Her Arrest

Keystone XL, Through Transcanada, Uses Eminent Domain to Seize Texan's Land

Rush to Judgment: Talk Radio's 'Truth Detector' Blows a Fuse--Again