73 online
 
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 14 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 2/22/13

Right Wing Media Pushes "Friends of Hamas" Rumor

Message James Wall
Become a Fan
  (19 fans)
Cross-posted from Wallwritings


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

One rumor in the anti-Chuck Hagel campaign started as a joking question that quickly swept through the right wing media machine until it reached Fox News business guru, Lou Dobbs.

It was such an outlandish charge that it should have been ignored and tossed into the "birther" trash can. The rumor "implied" that Hagel might have received funds from an organization called "Friends of Hamas."

Dan Friedman, the New York Daily News reporter who inadvertently launched the "Friends of Hamas" rumor, was shocked to see how quickly a joking question he posed casually over the phone, went from nowhere to everywhere. He tells his sad tale in the Daily News:

"On Febrary 6, I called a Republican aide on Capitol Hill with a question: Did [Chuck] Hagel's Senate critics know of controversial groups that he had addressed?

"Hagel was in hot water for alleged hostility to Israel. So, I asked my source, had Hagel given a speech to, say, the 'Junior League of Hezbollah, in France'? And: What about 'Friends of Hamas'?

"The names were so over-the-top, so linked to terrorism in the Middle East, that it was clear I was talking hypothetically and hyperbolically.

"No one could take seriously the idea that organizations with those names existed -- let alone that a former senator would speak to them."

Friedman was wrong.

The right wing media machine swung into action, sending Friedman's joking question on its mission to destroy Hagel.

The aide Friedman had initially called, promised to get back to him. He did not call, so Friedman followed up with a reminder e-mail to the aide that asked: "Did he get $25K speaking fee from Friends of Hamas?" The aide still did not respond.
One day later, Friedman was shocked to see that his joking question had reached the Breitbart News website, under the headline: Secret Hagel Donor?: White House SPOX Ducks Question on "Friends of Hamas."

The Brietbart author, Ben Shapiro wrote:
"On Thursday, Senate sources told Breitbart News exclusively that they have been informed one of the reasons that President Barack Obama's nominee for Secretary of Defense, Chuck Hagel, has not turned over requested documents on his sources of foreign funding is that one of the names listed is a group purportedly called 'Friends of Hamas.'"
Shapiro added that a White House spokesman hung up on him when he called for comment, an action Shapiro included in his story, buttressing "the assertion that the White House didn't deny the claim."

Shapiro tweeted the link to his Breitbart story to his nearly 40,000 Twitter followers. The joke had become a serious story, treated as such by commentators who did not check to see if it was true.

Friedman reports what happened next:
"Blogs like RedState.com and the National Review's The Corner linked to it. In Israel, Mike Huckabee said 'rumors of Chuck Hagel's having received funds from Friends of Hamas,' would, if true, 'disqualify him.'"
Noting that Slate.com was one of the first mainstream web sites to raise "big doubts whether 'Friends of Hamas' even exists," Friedman continued his narration:
"On Monday, I reached my source. The person denied sharing my query with Breitbart but admitted the chance of having mentioned it to others."

When Friedman spoke to him on Tuesday, Shapiro acknowledged "Friends of Hamas" might not exist. But he said his story used "very, very specific language" to avoid flatly claiming it did. Friedman's joking question had gone very, very wrong.

He concludes his role in the rumor story:
"I am, it seems, the creator of the 'Friends of Hamas' myth. Doing my job, I erred in counting on confidentiality and the understanding that my example was farcical -- and by assuming no one would print an unchecked rumor.

"If anyone didn't know already: Partisan agendas, Internet reporting and old-fashioned carelessness can move complete crocks fast. If you see a story on Hagel addressing the Junior League of Hezbollah, that's fake too."
The rumor, by this time, had taken on a life of its own. A single rumor became "rumors abound," in The National Review On Line, where Andrew Stiles wrote:
"Rumors abound on Capitol Hill that a full disclosure of Hagel's professional ties would reveal financial relationships with a number of 'unsavory' groups, including one purportedly called 'Friends of Hamas.' The GOP aide said it was 'noteworthy' that the White House has yet to deny the association. 'Maybe it's not true, but why not provide a list of groups he spoke to and remove all doubt?' the aide said."  
Veteran columnist David Wiegel was the first to do the obvious: He checked out "Friends of Hamas." On February 14, he wrote that he could find no evidence of its existence.
"There's no proof that 'Friends of Hamas' actually exists. At best, it's an organization so secret that nobody in government has thought to mention its existence. At worst, it's as fake as Manti Te'o's girlfriend.

"The Treasury Department, which designates sponsors of terror, has done so to many charities tied to Hamas. 'Friends of Hamas' is not among them. The State Department doesn't designate it, either. And a bit less holistically, a Lexis search for the group reveals absolutely nothing."
Lou Dobbs, on his Fox News program, interviewed National Review columnist Andrew McCarthy about the Hagel quandary, and "Friends of Hamas" came up again. (Click here for a video from the Dobbs Fox program. It runs four minutes.)

The following interview excerpt provides a flavor of Dobbs as an eager purveyor of the "Friends of Hamas" rumor.
"MCCARTHY: There was a report that came out last week -- not confirmed yet, but we're [i.e., the White House] also not denying it very vigorously -- that one of the groups behind the speeches may have been an outfit called Friends of Hamas. That is not going to --

"DOBBS: That has a ring to it, doesn't it?

"MCCARTHY: Catchy."

Catchy, indeed, and entirely made up from a false rumor created out of a joking question. The rumor spread quickly because the right-wing media machine wanted to promote a falsehood for political purposes. No one in that machine bothered to check out the story.

The Senate hearings on Chuck Hagel's nomination as defense secretary will resume next week. The Armed Services Committee has approved the nomination on a party line vote, 14 to 12.

Democratic leaders in the Senate want to present the nomination before Wednesday, February 27, to the full Senate for a final confirmation.

Opponents of Hagel on the Republican side of the aisle continue to mumble against a wounded Viet Nam veteran with extensive government and business experience, purely on spurious grounds.

Hagel's chief adversaries, John McCain and Lindsay Graham, appear however, to have given up any further thought of a filibuster against Hagel.

The sooner the better. The obvious fakery of the charges leveled against Hagel exposes the pettiness of Hagel's opponents, both in the right wing media and in the increasingly hard-right leadership of the Republican party.

The photo of former Senator Hagel (above) is by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

James Wall Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

James Wall served as a Contributing Editor of The Christian Century magazine, based in Chicago, Illinois, from 1999 through 2017. From 1972 through 1999, he was editor and publisher of the Christian Century magazine. Many sources have influenced (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

 
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Does Israel Interfere in US Elections?

New York Times Flacks for Jewish Groups Against 15 Major Christian Leaders

How Iran Could Be The Next Neocon Target

Ten Swing States Could Decide the 2012 Election; Obama Leads in Nine of Them

White Evangelicals Stifle Values For Trump

What Protestants Could Learn from Ron Paul

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend