Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   8 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Review of The Film Pandora’s Promise, Or the Pandora of The Nuclear Industry Or You Must Be Nuclear Scientist/Engi

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Supported 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 1/28/14

Become a Fan
  (16 fans)

(Article changed on January 29, 2014 at 08:41)

By Ethan Indigo Smith

Contributing Writer for Wake Up World

Pandora's eternal hellfiire
(image by open)

By Ethan Indigo Smith

Contributing Writer for Wake Up World

Twisted Comparisons

As a preliminary to my discussion of the latest pro-nuclear sewage spill, "Pandora's Promise", we have to get down to the basics -- in part because pro-nukers prefer to make things hyper-biased and convoluted with complexity,  factual omission and total bovine scat.

Remember, not all  Bequerels  are created equal.  We learn in middle school you can't compare apples to oranges, and yet pro-nuclear "scientists" continue to compare bananas to cesium, plutonium and uranium. The decay rate of radioactive potassium in bananas is absolutely harmless and will not cause death by a thousand cuts like the hyper-excited elements in industrial nuclear experimentation. You can't compare bananas to a triple meltout, including one MOX fueled reactor among them!

This twisted view led to a particularly laughable illustration in the recently screened film Pandora's Promise where, with CNN cartoon technology, the waste total of nuclear experimentation is shown to be so small that it could all be stored in one football stadium. This is a great way to relate this information, on one level, as most people can comprehend the size of a football stadium, but otherwise it is complete rubbish, based on the omission of critical information. And this was the common theme throughout.

For one, the United States has accumulated over 70,000 metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, and continues to accumulate 2,200 tons per year. Yet it has no place to permanently store the permanently toxic material. This is a massive environmental issue, today and for future generations, and should be presented that way.

Two, if pro-nukers tried to store it all in one place it would ignite and kill all life as we know it on the planet. Nuclear waste can never be contained to a space the size of a football stadium. Drawing this comparison is deceptive as it leads the public to believe that the waste generated by the nuclear industry can be isolated to one place.

Three, this comparison does not show the destruction caused by its extraction, refinement, water usage and normal releases when used as fuel.

Four, in perspective, just a handful of the stuff could kill masses of people in multiple ways. Those with environmental exposure suffer high rates of cysts and other health problems, and those most exposed suffer what is known as "death by a thousand cuts', the nuclear industry's term for being sliced up by radioactive particles (or the quaintly nicknamed "fuel fleas') which cut through human bodies and fry their organs into hydrogen peroxide.

Where is the Wisdom?

This leads to my main problem with the nuclear industry and its supporters. Pro-nukers have amassed a vast amount of knowledge in nuclear technology, but no wisdom. They know how to do many things, but can't contain their disastrous consequences and lack the integrity to pursue other safe and sustainable -- but less profitable -- sources of energy. And by sustainable I mean sustainable for generations, not just for today, or tomorrow. But instead the nuclear industry continues to endanger the balance of life on earth, creating a problem for generations, not just for today, or tomorrow.

Pro-nukers must be drinking the same vinegar the mythical Pandora did, believing that they can control the uncontrollable; believing they can control an eternally burning fire without getting burned.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

For more of Ethan Indigo Smith's writing you can go to link at where you can read the first portion of Ethan's books for free and purchase to support his endeavors. Ethan explores worldwide apathy in his recent serious satire, A (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Experimentation Killed Free Power

1984 And The Allegory of the Cave

Swine Flu May Be Renamed; How about Fecal Flu?

GE + TEPCO = Fukushima/Entropy/Death Part II

GE + TEPCO = Fukushima/Entropy/Death

108 Movements to a Meditative Mind State, The Five Tibetan Rites of Rejuvenation


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 8 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

From the time we just threw rocks at one another,... by molly cruz on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:47:14 PM
This article is overly simplistic, especially rega... by Richard Pietrasz on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:51:47 PM
Nuclear scientist Arnie Gunderson collected random... by Dave Winship on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 4:49:35 PM
Nukes need to go. End of story to anyone who's bee... by Daniel Geery on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:37:14 PM
How about safer Thorium reactors, no nuke bomb pos... by jean labrek on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06:23 PM
There are no nuclear power "accidents."The Future ... by Joe Giambrone on Tuesday, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:55:54 PM
Thanks everyone for adding on.  I wanted to m... by Ethan Indigo Smith on Wednesday, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:08:57 AM
thanks ethan for always keeping this issue alive.... by laurie steele on Thursday, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:19:25 AM