Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 11 (11 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Reverse bank robbery – how the big banks are robbing us blind

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 9/7/09

Become a Fan
  (112 fans)
- Advertisement -
<

(Using laymen's language, what follows here is a simplified version of an article by economist Dean Baker at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/aug/31/banking-profits-us-economy

Even that giant corpse Citigroup is showing signs of life. But how could that be? Answer: Our government is using our money to pick up Citigroup's bad debts and is paying them a nice profit for the "privilege."

Here's how it works: We (through our government) lend big banks the money that they then lend back to us, albeit at a considerably higher interest rate than the rate that we (through our government) charge them for what we loaned them.

To use simple round numbers, let's say that the big banks have borrowed $1 trillion from the Fed's various lending facilities. (Actually, the Fed's total loans to the banks now exceed $2 trillion.)

Now suppose the banks pay an average interest rate of 0.2% for this rounded off trillion dollars that they've borrowed. If the banks then use that trillion to buy up government bonds that pay a 3.5% interest rate, they can pocket the difference of 3.3 percentage points. This means that on a trillion dollars of federal lending to them, the banks will 'earn' $33 billion a year in net interest or profit! Essentially, this is the extra money that our government is paying the banks so that we can borrow back the money that we lent them through our Fed. In other words, we taxpayers are essentially giving banks like Citigroup many billions every year through crazy schemes like this. And the big banks are referring to these giveaway billions as 'earnings'!

- Advertisement -

Of course this is not the entire story of the banks' return to profitability at our expense. We also have to acknowledge the shrewd traders at Goldman Sachs who take some of the money that they've borrowed (either directly from our government or with our government's guarantee) and use it to speculate on items like oil and other commodities.

These Goldman boys are betting that they can outguess the markets, but in more ways than one they are doing it at our expense. For example, the Goldman boys (the smartest of the smart) might catch oil on the way up, betting that oil prices will rise, and what do you know, often they do rise. The result for us: millions of us consumers start paying higher gas prices sooner than we otherwise would, and part of those extra millions we pay go to provide Goldman's trading profits.

As it turned out, Goldman's bets were winners in the second quarter, so this means that we taxpayers paid for Goldman's profits by way of the higher gap between the prices paid by gasoline buyers (and other consumers), and the money received by oil companies and other producers. (In other words, Goldman was the 'middleman' that took the growing difference between these two amounts.) Of course, if Goldman's bets had gone badly, taxpayers would have been forced to cough up the money to make up the losses directly through our Treasury. Either way, middle class taxpayers and consumers get screwed.

That is the basic story of our predatory banking industry, facilitated by a government that is secretly working against us, and for them. These folks (many of whom, as high-level employees, go back and forth between government and banking) have the system set up so that they can make big money pretty much regardless of what happens, with the risk of bad outcomes all placed on the taxpayers.

How very smart of them, and how very dumb of us!

- Advertisement -

 

Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Stop big banks from stealing our money.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Several years after receiving my M.A. in social science (interdisciplinary studies) I was an instructor at S.F. State University for a year, but then went back to designing automated machinery, and then tech writing, in Silicon Valley. I've (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

New JFK assassination bombshells

Was Pat Tillman Murdered by an American Sharpshooter to Shut Him up?

The cholesterol - heart disease scam: How the medical-industrial complex is raking in billions at our expense

Two U.S. presidents implicated by ex-CIA black-ops assassin

Four Ticking Time Bombs That Will Soon Ignite a Revolution

The Ultimate Goal of the Bankster-led Political-economic Warfare Being Waged Against Us Is . . . ?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
and then get rid of it....them. There's nothing Fe... by Nick van Nes on Monday, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:07:25 AM
The Public Option In Banking: How We Can Beat Wall... by Richard Clark on Monday, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:54:12 AM