OpEdNews Op Eds

Responsibility and Respect

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 4 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (38 fans)

Bust of Zeus British Museum London

Responsibility and Respect

By Richard Girard

" Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have."

Saul Alinsky (1909--72), U.S. radical activist. Rules for Radicals, "Tactics" (1971).

" Power has only one duty--to secure the social welfare of the People."

Benjamin Disraeli (1804--81), English statesman, author. Sybil, Book 4, Chapter 14 (1845).

Professor Weston in my Constitutional Law class almost thirty years ago stated that one should always look at dissenting opinions to find the Supreme Court's future. His example was Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), which stated that truly separate but equal facilities would not long be maintained by the majority for any minority.

Justice Thurgood Marshall's dissent in Clark v. Community for Creative Non-Violence (468 U.S. 288), regarding the First Amendment's provisions for Freedom of Speech and Freedom to Peaceably Assemble for Redress of Grievances, falls into this same category. His dissent, with which Justice William Brennan concurred, started as follows:

"The Court's disposition of this case is marked by two related failings. First, the majority is either unwilling or unable to take seriously the First Amendment claims advanced by respondents. Contrary to the impression given by the majority, respondents are not supplicants seeking to wheedle an undeserved favor from the Government. They are citizens raising issues of profound public importance who have properly turned to the courts for the vindication of their constitutional rights. Second, the majority misapplies the test for ascertaining whether a restraint on speech qualifies as a reasonable time, place, and manner regulation. In determining what constitutes a sustainable regulation, the majority fails to subject the alleged interests of the Government to the degree of scrutiny required to ensure that expressive activity protected by the First Amendment remains free of unnecessary limitations."

The determinant for governments on matters such as freedom of speech, the right to peaceably assemble, and the right to demand redress of grievances, has regrettably always come down to a single, simple question: is it convenient for "the people who are in charge?"

The Occupy Movement is extremely inconvenient for the oligarchs of the One Percent, who have deluded themselves into believing that they are running things.

The U.S. Constitution is still in force, which means that "We the People" are still in charge, at least in theory.

We the People are aware of the attempts by the oligarch's lackeys to disenfranchise large portions of the electorate, including the elderly and minorities. This will not stand. We remind ourselves continuously of the words of Pastor Martin Niemöller in Nazi Germany (in paraphrase):

"First they came for the Socialists and Communists, and I did nothing.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

Richard Girard is an increasingly radical representative of the disabled and disenfranchised members of America's downtrodden, who suffers from bipolar disorder (type II or type III, the professionals do not agree). He has put together a team to (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Great Enemy of the Truth

Into a Thousand Pieces

The Communist Takeover of America

Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense

Social Capitalism

The Judgment of History; Or Why the Breaking of the Oligarchs Avenges President Kennedy's Assassination--Part One

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

in the morning.  It smells like...hmmm...noth... by Richard Girard on Friday, Jan 6, 2012 at 4:38:35 PM
An excellent piece of analysis premised on a lie: ... by H. Kevin McNeelege on Saturday, Jan 7, 2012 at 8:17:11 AM
And I agree that OWS is in a rut. But you are not... by Richard Girard on Tuesday, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:57:40 PM