Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (3 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   No comments, 3 series

General News

"Reset" or "Strategic Pause": Pakistan's New Ambassador's First Remarks to U.S. Public

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 2/15/12

Become a Fan
  (10 fans)
- Advertisement -

Ambassador Sherry Rehman; image courtesy of Google

"Reset" or "Strategic Pause": Pakistan's New Ambassador's First Remarks to U.S. Public

My most recent associations with Pakistan have been divided loyalties between East and West; the country's enmity with a strong U.S. ally, India, though a fragile peace is currently on the horizon between these close "cousins"; and shock that the U.S. search for bin Laden ended up at a sheltered location there. For me, that was just the Eastern aspect of Pakistan asserting itself, even as it is badly in need of U.S. aid.

But all the above simplify a highly complex web of conflicts. Violence occurs daily in her country, the new ambassador from Pakistan to the United States told us in her first public remarks in this country, hosted at the U.S. Institute of Peace in Washington, DC. What amazed me the most about the brilliant and hugely accomplished Sherry Rehman was her absolute mastery not only of the English language--she attended college here and did outstandingly well--but of the idiom of diplomacy.

All terminology with any violent connotations is surrounded with negatives (Pakistan is not just about "bombs and bullets," e.g.). Her narrative is one of cautious hope even as she frankly complained about America's "growing footprint" in her country. The media narrative of Pakistan is wholly negative, she lamented, where there is also a vibrant, multifaceted culture thriving in the context of a new and democratic government featuring elections, a functional parliament that sets foreign policy, and an effective judiciary who are beginning to cooperate well as other governmental institutions "striving for equilibrium."

Amid all of this development, Rehman advocates a "strategic pause." There is much to set right.

But are we speaking more than different languages? I have that feeling about the impasse in the Middle East. Which country was it that said that 9/11 occurs routinely there, though it was such a gaping, mind-boggling shock to us? It could be that on that day not only was fear born, but more of a commonality with the rest of the world, most of it on the same extended continent, and therefore internal decay from mutual hostilities is frequent history rather than a one-time, catastrophic trauma? We are so well situated we had become spoiled and now are less so, based on an ambience of fear. Air travel is no longer such fun as each U.S. outgoing or returning passenger is forced to relive 9/11 at some level.

I greatly admire Rehman and others, including USIP, for taking on such a complex web of issues and trying both to make sense of them and to "reset" so much of what is wrong: daily occasions of violence among any number of terrorist or extremist (or both) groups that represent multiple nationalities and ethnic roots ("internal terrorism"); the NATO presence in Afghanistan that was severely hampered when Pakistan cut off the thoroughfare to Afghanistan that went through it in retaliation for the death of twenty-four Pakistani troops at Mohmand on the international border, without the immediate apology Pakistan expected from NATO.

That tragedy was the straw that broke the camel's back--forgive the cliche--in 2011, a bad year for U.S.--Pakistan relations; the ambassador expressed this event as an "end-line trigger of a series of "bilateral catastrophes.'" The U.S. capture and killing of bin Laden was an affront to Pakistani sovereignty. That is a conundrum for scholars of international relations but fortunately did not in itself cause the outbreak of a war. The event probably distills the "cognitive dissonance" or "trust deficit" that plagues relations between the U.S. and Pakistan.

- Advertisement -

Even as I read and reread the text of Rehman's remarks, which U.S.I.P. conscientiously distributed to attendees, I marvel anew at the language, not steeped enough myself in diplomatic venues but feeling like an outsider stumbling over British English for the first time and being amazed at its elegance.

Does it conceal as much as it reveals? Is it a strong lid on an explosive pressure cooker? Can it be called, very simply, "Euphemisms," period?

Even as the media embraced the first visit of China's "heir apparent" to leadership of the country, Xi Jinping, with a front-page photo of our mixed-lineage president warmly shaking the hand of the Asian diplomatic future between these two countries, I noticed in a small, parenthetical entry that Pakistan will now allow NATO to ship food to its troops in Afghanistan--the first time this has been allowed after what the media called an accidental killing, and we must believe this. I wonder if the coincidence between Rehman's visit and Pakistan's concession is purposeful.

Diplomacy is fraught with such complexity, hypocrisy (with its harsh reminder from Wikileaks recently), a nation unto itself with its own dialects, multiple layers, frantic attempts at communication amid this all. It keeps as much peace as can be kept, is one perspective, that lid on the boiling cauldron materialized?

The ambassador's speech contained so much more--her country's pain at being left out of recent international negotiations and its "non-intrusive peace offensive" [note the oxymoron, where the denotation of violence is transformed] in its own region, "a concentric circle of countries" that include Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Russia, and China.

- Advertisement -

Rehman professed no intention of "bringing a victim narrative" to Washington, but instead a plan to publish weekly statistics on casualties in her country that result from all forms of terrorism. The number of civilian casualties in Afghanistan is at a historic high and her country cannot afford another civil war there, she said. On the horizon is a "roadmap of the terms of our renewed cooperation."

Watering the conflagration that is only part of her country's story is the first "sustained elected government in many decades"--the U.S. knows the "value of power rooted in democracy" and, concluded this protegee of Benazir Bhutto, "I for one am known for speaking truth to power."

As a longtime advocate and activist for peace, I did not feel terribly powerful myself--marveling at her dignity and euphemistic challenge to find some treasure beneath the heaps of corpses that symbolize the chronic discord her country suffers from.

Next Page  1  |  2


Marta Steele is an author/editor/blogger who has been writing for since 2006. Her original website,, first entered the blogosphere in 2003. She recently became an editor for She has in the past taught (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -
Google Content Matches:

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Review: Andrew Kreig, "Presidential Puppetry: Obama, Romney, and Their Masters"

Ohio Heroes On Path To Deposing Rove

Smart Security or Dumb Dollar$?

There Is Life on Mars, Not Just Water

Shall the Truth Set Us Free? (with a surprise afterword by Greg Palast)

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear: Colbert, Stewart,, and Audience Sober Up


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments