Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
Life Arts

Reported Leak Casts Doubt on Favored Solution for Global Warming

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (4 fans)

Cow killed by a 1986 natural carbon dioxide leak at Lake Nyos. The leakage killed 1,700 people and a large number of livestock. (source)

A surprise announcement from Canada January 11 has suddenly cast doubt on a favored solution for curbing global warming -- burying carbon dioxide deep in the earth.

Since 1997, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has been promoting experiments to capture carbon dioxide gas (CO2), compress it into a liquid, and bury it a mile below ground. CO2 from burning coal and oil is the major cause of global warming; the plan to bury it is known as "carbon capture and sequestration" or CCS for short.

Like DOE, the coal and oil industries favor CCS. The coal industry calls it "clean coal" and desperately wants it to succeed. In the U.S. in recent years more than 100 coal power plants have been canceled or seriously delayed, often because of CO2 emissions. Without the deployment of CCS on a grand scale, the future of the coal industry looks grim -- and Uncle Sam is playing a key role, helping Big Coal survive. Energy Secretary Steven Chu said recently that his agency has, so far, promoted CCS with direct expenditures of $4 billion plus another $8 billion in loan guarantees.

The oil industry, too, has a deep interest in CCS. Since the late 1970s, oil companies have pumped CO2 into depleted oil fields to release additional petroleum, a process known as "enhanced oil recovery," or EOR. With EOR, some of the CO2 remains underground, keeping it out of the atmosphere. However, burning the recovered oil releases more CO2 than is sequestered, so CCS for oil recovery still exacerbates global warming. Nevertheless, CCS advocates have long pointed to EOR projects as evidence that carbon sequestration has already been proven to succeed.

Now that claim has fallen under a cloud. On January 11, the Winnipeg Free Press announced that CO2 has been found leaking out of the ground from a CCS oil-recovery demonstration at Weyburn in Saskatchewan.

Since 2000, at Weyburn the oil industry has been pumping more than 5000 tons of liquid CO2 into the ground each day to demonstrate CCS. The CO2 arrives at Weyburn via a 200-mile-long pipe from the Great Plains Synfuels coal gasification plant in Beulah, North Dakota. From its earliest days, the U.S. Department of Energy has supported the Weyburn demonstration.

The stakes couldn't be higher. CO2 can be captured from smoke stacks, but it could also be captured directly from the atmosphere, pressurized, and piped to a suitable location for burial deep in the ground. If CCS were deployed on an enormous scale worldwide -- as its proponents hope -- there would be little need for renewable energy like solar, wind or geothermal. As a way to curb global warming, CCS is supported by the coal, oil, natural gas, automobile, railroad and electric power industries because it would allow them all to continue burning fossil fuels, including so-called unconventional fuels such as Canada's tar sands, oil and gas from shale, liquid fuels from coal, and perhaps even methane hydrates from beneath the ocean floor. Taken together, these energy resources are enormous and enormously dirty. Thus CCS creates a fork in the road for the world's energy future -- will we invest trillions of dollars to stay on the path of high-carbon fossil fuels with CCS, or will we invest in low-carbon renewables like solar, wind and geothermal?

On January 11, a Saskatchewan couple, Cameron and Jane Kerr, released a bombshell consultant's report indicating that CO2 has been leaking out of the ground beneath their Weyburn farm, ruining their pond and killing small animals like rabbits, ducks, and cats. The Canadian Press told the story in a short video.

CO2 creates the fizz in soft drinks and beer, but in concentrated form it is odorless, tasteless, invisible, heavier than air, and a potent asphyxiant. If released, concentrated CO2 can form an invisible puddle that excludes oxygen, suffocating anything in its path.

In his technical report, geological engineer Paul Lafleur of Petro-Find Geochem, wrote, "The... source of the high concentrations of CO2 in the soils of the Kerr property is clearly the anthropogenic CO2 injected into the Weyburn reservoir." The Kerrs have abandoned their property, fearing for their own safety.

As word of the Kerr's experience at Weyburn gets around, opposition to land-based CCS seems likely to grow. This could increase the pressure to site CCS projects beneath the oceans, where no one lives. In New Jersey, a coalition of 35 environmental, civic and religious groups is aggressively opposing a plan to bury liquid CO2 1.5 miles beneath the floor of the Atlantic Ocean, 70 miles offshore from Atlantic City. It's a worthy fight.

 

Peter Montague, Ph.D., is a historian and journalist whose work has appeared in Alternet; Counterpunch; Grist; Huffington Post; Multinational Monitor; The Nation; New Solutions; OpEdNews; Race, Poverty & the Environment; Rachel's Environment & (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Fracking And Other Disasters Are So Hard to Stop

Poisoning Urban Children: White Privilege and Toxic Lead

Weyburn Carbon Storage Project Enters a Critical Phase

Reported Leak Casts Doubt on Favored Solution for Global Warming

Why the Environmental Movement Is Not Winning

Industry's Plan for Us

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Relatively the leakage of CO2 in the article h... by Romans Nazarovs on Thursday, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:21:22 PM
The situation cannot stand the open air. The alarm... by Mike Preston on Friday, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:15:47 PM
Just how do you get a pure concentration of CO2 is... by Mike Preston on Friday, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:36:18 PM
Hello--The CO2 delivered to Weyburn via pipeline f... by Peter Montague on Saturday, Jan 22, 2011 at 3:09:54 PM
Here is the Wiki entry on the Lake Nyos gas erupti... by Mike Preston on Friday, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:44:37 PM
According (http://escholarship.org/uc/item/45q856... by Romans Nazarovs on Saturday, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:03:48 PM