Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   13 comments, 4 series

Life Arts

Recent NSA Ruling Actually REALLY Bad News?

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 3   Well Said 1   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 12/23/13

Become a Fan
  (72 fans)


Steven Rosenfeld
(image by Steven Rosenfeld)


My guest today is Steven Rosenfeld, Senior Reporter at AlterNet. 

Joan Brunwasser: Welcome back to OpEdNews, Steven.  Reading your piece* about the recent NSA ruling was like being doused by a bucket of cold water. We progressives were feeling a tad optimistic but you obviously do not share that feeling. What do you know that we don't? 

Steven Rosenfeld: Hi. Thanks for having me here. I'm not sure that I know anything exclusive or special. But I have been a reporter covering a range of democracy issues--voting rights, money in politics, corporate constitutional rights--and two things pop up. First, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon, who wrote the decision taking the NSA electronic eavesdropping to task, is a hard-core right winger and known loose cannon. He's like a mini-Scalia. He is known for berating people from the bench. He's issued some really bad pro-corporate decisions, such as singlehandedly stopping years of public health efforts to change tobacco warning labels from text to images. He was a Republican House staffer who blocked inquiries in the Iran-Contra affair. He is not exactly a reliable friend of progressives, even if reaches a conclusion on NSA spying that we on the left like.

That said, I think it's naive, a bit dangerous, and certainly uninformed when lots of left-leaning media outlets and even liberal Democratic Senators call Judge Leon a civil liberties hero, or our new best friend, or wave his elbows-out opinion trashing the NSA as proof that we were correct in our criticism all along. We were and are correct, but we don't need a right-winger like Leon to validate that. That seems a bit naive to me. 

And there's one other piece to this. I don't think enough people, including reporters, understand how the federal courts work. Each district court circuit is like a kingdom unto itself. And what often happens is you get opposite decisions on the same issue in different circuits. Those conflicting opinions are what bubbles up to the Supreme Court. Washington has a special place in this process because it's not state; it's a federal jurisdiction. So that makes it a faster track for legal challenges that are aiming for Supreme Court review. 

When a judge like Leon takes a strong position on the NSA and other judges in other circuits take opposite positions--as they have--that puts the whole issue of NSA domestic data mining and spying on a fast track to the Supreme Court. And today's Supreme Court has a majority that has a split personality on individual rights. Its tends to support them in some contexts but not others. In policing and national security issues, it sides with state power. What I'm also saying is that this ruling by Leon that we on the left like may push this whole issue of NSA spying before the Supreme Court where we'd get a ruling that we will not like.   

JB: I haven't read anywhere else anything like what you're writing and saying, Steven. Where's the press on this?      

SR: Where's the press on this? Well, too many people--i.e., including editorial writers who look down at us in the lefty media ghetto, such as the NY Times--too quickly grab onto a news hook or opinion or development that suits their immediate agenda, without thinking about who is the messenger beyond the immediate message or what it may mean down the road. I know there are lots of strange bedfellows in politics, but this is a pattern you see everywhere. 

Leon's decision is a big slap at the NSA and Obama's national security state. But I don't think people see him as a Rand Paul in black judicial robes. Which is not that far off. People see a way to push for more privacy protections, which is a legitimate concern. But they don't realize who this judge is, his record and reputation, and how opinions from the DC court (even if you like them) become a fast track way to push constitutional questions upstairs, to the Supreme Court. I don't know why others don't write about this. But talk to trial lawyer friends. They will tell you. None of this would be news to them. 

JB: Is there anything good that can come out of Judge Leon's ruling or is it unmitigatedly bad news, in the long run?

SR: In the short run, many people and institutions with big podiums--U.S. Senators, the Times editorial page--are citing it and pushing back on Obama and Congress. They are ramping up the pressure to pass new laws to rein in the NSA. That feeds into the general atmosphere of criticism facing Obama, but I really haven't seen anything suggesting that privacy rights are growing in America. Or are poised to be more protected? Or elevated? Have you? 

Look at the White House's response to its own panel that made suggestions on the NSA surveillance. It seems lukewarm at best. And the panel is suggesting that private companies hold onto data about our digital lives until the government comes calling. Well, these firms are holding that data anyway. I suppose it is positive that powerful people can and do speak up, but these days it just seems like even more powerful institutions just wait out the noise and keep on doing what they do. I just don't expect the current Supreme Court majority to put privacy rights ahead of national security. I'm sorry if that sounds discouraging.    

JB: It is discouraging, Steve.   Not what we want in our collective Christmas stocking. Anything to add before we close, Steven? Anything at all we can be doing to fight off these incessant and insidious incursions on our privacy rights? 

SR: I wish I could close with more encouraging words. I just think that we all have to be realistic and still do the best that we can with the tools at our disposal. I know that historically the people who have triumphed against adversity kept fighting for what they believed, didn't surrender, and somehow preserved their integrity despite incredible slights and injuries. 

I have studied the steady loss of civil liberties in Nazi-occupied Europe--and even have a book about events in 1943 Holland that I hope will be published there next year. The details from one era to the next are never the same, but there are similar dynamics. Right now, the growth of the Internet and the state's surveillance powers are at a powerful confluence and there's not much pushback or even attempted legal balancing. That's a bit abstract but it's also scary. We're told all the time now about accepting a tradeoff between privacy and state security. I don't buy it. What can any of us do? We can use the podiums we have and try to speak up. But going back to Judge Leon, we don't need a right winger to validate our view.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.opednews.com/author/author79.html

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

Other Series: View All 1 Articles in "NSA/surveillance"

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out PayUpNow.org!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 13 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

ROFLMAO!!!!This is a first.  I've never seen ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:03:56 PM
So true, Mark.  Very funny too. Although I ag... by Truth Will Prevail on Wednesday, Dec 25, 2013 at 9:02:14 PM
Mark, you disappoint me. I assume you read the rul... by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:19:26 AM
I was just shooting down a comical attempt by Rose... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 5:32:35 PM
Oh, if you want to read the order for yourself, it... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Monday, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:16:57 PM
Thank you for providing this informative article a... by Hubert Steed on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 9:03:10 AM
Yep, the corporate/government team works together ... by Mark Adams JD/MBA on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:01:19 PM
We can talk about this, our loss of privacy, until... by Nick van Nes on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:03:10 PM
"I really haven't seen anything suggesting that pr... by Robert S. Becker on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 5:41:12 PM
And the Supreme Court no longer observes the "conf... by George Flower on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 6:48:37 PM
Yeah, helleva way for Joan to get to her second mi... by Robert S. Becker on Tuesday, Dec 24, 2013 at 7:17:02 PM
Well, I'll hazard a theory. If it is true, as you ... by Jack Flanders on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:40:11 AM
I'm inferring from your "Say what?" above that you... by Kim Cassidy on Sunday, Dec 29, 2013 at 7:44:05 PM