Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

R.I.P. Marius, the 'surplus' giraffe

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Supported 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H4 2/14/14

Marius, the giraffe
(image by The Guardian/Keld Navntoft/AFP/Getty Images)

By Bob Gaydos

They killed a giraffe in Denmark Sunday. Executed him, actually, with a bolt gun, at the Copenhagen Zoo. Then they performed an autopsy and butchered his body while an announcer explained what was happening to a crowd of onlookers that included lots of wide-eyed, young children.

Finally, they fed the carcass to the lions and tigers.

The Romans couldn't have made more of a spectacle of it.

The giraffe, Marius, was two years old and, apparently, in the best of health. He posed no known threat to any other living creature. His "crime," according to the two men responsible for killing him, was that he was too normal. The product of a breeding program at the zoo, Marius was apparently unfortunate enough to possess the type of genes that the scientists said were already well-represented in the zoo's giraffe population. Allowing him to continue as part of the breeding program would not be good for the giraffe population as a whole, they said. He was surplus material.

Bam! Bye,bye, Marius.

There's more. Copenhagen Zoo officials had an offer from Yorkshire Wildlife Park in Britain to take Marius off their hands. The British zoo is part of the same breeding program as the Copenhagen Zoo and has a state-of-the-art giraffe program. In fact, Marius' older brother lives there. But Copenhagen Zoo officials didn't even bother to answer the British zoo's inquiries, saying they felt Marius and his surplus genes would also be taking up valuable space in the British zoo's program. The offer of a private individual to buy Marius for $680,000 and place him in a wildlife preserve was also ignored.

One more thing. When word of Marius' impending execution was revealed, more than 20,000 people signed online petitions to find him another home rather than kill him. Rather than discuss the matter with animal rights activists who organized the petition, zoo officials moved up the execution without telling anyone.

There is so much wrong with this story, it's hard to know where to start.

Let's go with the arrogance that permeates this entire affair. First of all, giraffes are not considered to be an endangered species and the zoo scientists acknowledge the animals breed well. So why the breeding program in the first place? If the species is taking care of its diversity on its own, why do humans have to meddle in the process? Because we know better what's good for them? Breeding a giraffe in captivity and then killing that same giraffe two years later because he possessed no special genetic makeup (Oops! We made a mistake.) hardly suggests a higher order of thinking. Callous disregard for life, yes. Enlightenment, no.

To then insist that the pubic butchering of the animal and feeding him to the lions was a scientifically and culturally valuable experience for the young children who watched is utter nonsense and reeks of a desperate attempt to justify the act. I have no idea what was going on in the minds of parents who allowed their young children to be subjected to this abuse, but this was not "natural" as zoo officials insisted. This was a man-made spectacle. In nature, Marius would at least have had a chance to evade his predators. Zoo officials lured him with a piece of rye bread before they shot him in the head.

As for moving up the execution when public protests grew, the haste with which the zoo, not only killed Marius, but got rid of his remains, might suggest to a suspicious person a sense of urgency to get rid of the evidence. Of what, I have no idea, because I'm not schooled in what zoos might do to their animals.

Which leads me to the bigger point here and perhaps the only good news to come from Marius' untimely demise: It raises an awareness of the need to find out what exactly does go on in zoos and whether they are really necessary -- in any way -- for the benefit of animals, as opposed to entertainment of humans.

Copenhagen Zoo officials said such killings are routine in zoos, to preserve and protect the animals. Or perhaps, to balance the zoo's budget? After all, zoos are limited in space as well as funds. Today's cute giraffe baby can easily become tomorrow's surplus mouth to feed in such conditions. How routine is this culling of zoo populations? Who decides? What are the regulations or guidelines?

Animals also obviously get bored being confined in zoos or even safari parks. And exploitation and abuse of animals is not unknown, especially in zoos lacking oversight by outside agencies. But Marius was killed in a respected zoo in a major European capital in a country with a reputation for progressive thinking. And he was the byproduct of a breeding program to which zoos throughout Europe subscribe and whose scientists endorsed the execution of Marius, the innocent.

Next Page  1  |  2


Bob Gaydos is a veteran of 40-plus years in daily newspapers. He began as police reporter with The (Binghamton, N.Y.) Sun-Bulletin, eventually covering government and politics as well as serving as city editor, features editor, sports editor and (more...)
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Look at me, would you believe 'the picture of health'?

Can we just not call it food?

The new 'breakfast of champions'

The system's rigged; time to revolt

Where have all the honey bees gone?

John Roberts, unlikely hero of the left wing


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
9 people are discussing this page, with 14 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

OUTRAGEOUS! How is it possible that this is busine... by Idrea Ramaci on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:09:19 PM ... by Idrea Ramaci on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:17:38 PM
click here ... by Idrea Ramaci on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:37:19 PM
People like that zoo keeper have no place to be in... by Suzana Megles on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:15:52 PM
This story upset me. Just a blatant disregard for ... by Bob Gormley on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 5:38:38 PM
I share the outrage of many. This was an entirely... by K V Ramani on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 7:32:13 PM
I have been to zoos all over the world.  In a... by Doc McCoy on Friday, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:26:49 PM
Pathologists don't invite their children and fami... by K V Ramani on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 6:07:27 AM
        &n... by Bob Gormley on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:04:49 AM
The situation that was Marius is getting more conv... by Rev. Dan Vojir on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 1:00:01 AM
This story is sad, but what is sadder is that Bel... by linda jordan on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:40:22 AM
This is no more shocking than business as usual to... by Bob Stuart on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 2:16:29 PM
It's not the same thing. ... by Bob Gormley on Saturday, Feb 15, 2014 at 3:43:14 PM
For some time I have thought that zoos are not rea... by Carol Sturm on Friday, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:14:35 PM