Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Punishment for NSA & DOJ Overclassification in Drake Case

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/2/11

- Advertisement -

While I'm glad that - thanks to a no-win compromise - the nation will not be bankrupting itself, I again feel compelled to draw your attention away from the debt ceiling deal.  
Today's New York Times reports that former classification czar J. William Leonard filed a formal complaint with his former office - the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) - requesting punishment for the National Security Agency (NSA) and Justice Department officials who improperly classified documents in the Espionage Act case against NSA whistleblower Thomas Drake.

Leonard articulates the significance of his complaint in the Times:

If you're talking about throwing someone in jail for years, there absolutely has to be responsibility for decisions about what gets classified . . .

The document in question (an e-mail) was used as the basis for an Espionage Act charge for improper retention - not disclosure - of classified information.  Yet, according to Leonard, the e-mail never should have been classified in the first place. In fact, NSA declassified the e-mail after the indictment against Drake was filed.  

We know how the Drake case ended. The Justice Department's Espionage Act case completely collapsed, and Drake pleaded to a minor misdemeanor in July.   Judge Richard Bennett slammed the Justice Department  for its handling of the case and sentenced Drake to probation and community service.

Since then, Judge Bennett has agreed to allow Leonard to use the still-secret e-mail in his complaint against NSA and DOJ.  

Leonard's complaint is well taken. There is universal agreement that rampant overclassification plagues the intelligence community.  Steven Aftergood  put it best:

- Advertisement -

Depending on who you ask, overclassification is either very widespread or extremely widespread.

The difficulty is government officials are often punished for failing to classify information, but rarely or never punished for overclassifying information.

As classification czar, Leonard saw the massive problem of overclassification first hand, but he  said  about the Drake case:

I've never seen a more deliberate and willful example of government officials improperly classifying a document.

That "deliberate and willful" overclassification smacks of retaliation, and a Justice Department determined to punish a whistleblower for cooperating with government investigators and revealing NSA gross waste and illegalities.  

The significance of his own case is not lost on Drake, and he wrote about his case publicly for the first time in an  op-ed (which I co-authored) in yesterday's Philadelphia Inquirer :

This administration's attack on national-security whistle-blowers expands Bush's secrecy regime and cripples the free press by silencing its most important sources. It's a recipe for the slow poisoning of a democracy.

Improper classification only furthers the secrecy regime. There are certainly secrets that the government needs to keep - the identities of covert operatives, sources and methods, troop movements, etc. But to bastardize the classification system by using it to punish whistleblowers undermines both the system's legitimacy and our democracy.  

- Advertisement -

Hopefully, ISOO will recognize as much and will see Leonard's complaint as an opportunity to set a much-needed precedent for holding accountable government officials who keep too much government information from public view, particularly if the classified information is used as the basis for criminal charges.

ALSO REPUBLISHED BY WHISTLEBLOWERS ROUND TABLE.

 

http://www.patriotictruthteller.net

My name is Jesselyn Radack and I am the former Justice Department ethics attorney and whistleblower in the case of "American Taliban" John Walker Lindh. In today's issue of The National Law Journal (Feb. 19, 2007), I have an Op-Ed entitled (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Charging Wikileaks Source: The Nail in the Coffin of Whistblowers

DHS Spies on Maryland Peace Activists: It's Worse Than We Thought

McCarthyism on Steroids: Monitoring Americans

Wash. Post Profile: Thomas Drake (An NSA Whistleblower We Would Have Cheered During the Bush Years)

Yoo's Gift to President Obama: Return to Sender

Justice Department Leakers of Classified Info. Get a Pass

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

We're going to be seeing a lot more of people comi... by Peter Duveen on Tuesday, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:31:31 PM
the article includes "There are certainly secrets ... by Archie on Tuesday, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:34:57 PM