Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite Save As Favorite View Article Stats
1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

Proposed State Tax Ruling Unfair, Says LGBT Advocacy Group

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Funny 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Headlined to H3 1/14/14

opednews.com


SC Equality
(image by South Carolina Equality)


A court decision that benefits same-sex married couples regarding federal taxes might not have the same effect on the state level in South Carolina. And on January 9, an advocacy group called for the public to do something about it.

The June 2013 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court allows same-sex married couples to file with a married deduction on federal income tax, removing previous denial of that right from Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act.

A recent proposal from South Carolina's Dept. of Revenue would specifically deny that same benefit from its own income tax, however, requiring gay and lesbian married couples to continue filing state tax returns as "single" or "head of household."

The result won't be just high state taxes for gay spouses, though, says South Carolina Equality, a non-profit advocacy group for LGBT rights.  It will also require longer filing times and higher costs to prepare returns, the organization says.

In a January 9 press release, SC Equality encourages the public to contact SCDOR, which is accepting comments on the proposal until January 17.

SC Equality's website also has a page listing arguments, as well as an email that visitors can send to SCDOR directly from its site.

Ryan Wilson, executive director of SC Equality, offers a personal example of the inconvenience.

"This ruling will directly impact me and my husband because we use a tax preparer--costing us more time to separate our finances and more money to have our taxes prepared than our straight friends or neighbors. SCDOR should have a tax policy that is clear and uniform for all legally married couples."

Filed on Jan. 2, 2014, SCDOR's proposal for Revenue Ruling #13 states:

"Since South Carolina does not recognize same-sex marriage, same-sex couples that file as married for federal income tax purposes must file separate from South Carolina income tax purposes(.)"

To correctly complete state tax returns, then, partners of a gay or lesbian marriage would each have to recalculate personal net income from federal tax forms using a "single" or "head of household" personal deduction. Thus, their net income levels would appear larger on state returns, subjecting them to higher state taxes, which would also have to be filed separately.

Notes Wilson, "This is where the extra time and costs for tax preparer will come in. SCDOR is telling gay couples they don't care how much work or cost it takes; they cannot accept their married federal return, even to use it to calculate tax rates. They will continue to accept straight couples' returns no matter what, though. There are now two separate systems for dealing with legally-married South Carolinians."

The proposal does not intend to discriminate, SCDOR says. Instead, according to spokesperson Samantha Creek, it's simply to recognize SCDOR's obligation to state law.

Article XVII, Section 15, of the South Carolina Constitution says the state will only recognize "marriage between one man and one woman(.)"

Because some who are eligible for the new federal ruling might assume that it's also applicable to state taxes, leading to filings that will need correction, Cheek implies that SCDOR hopes the proposed ruling would avoid difficulties for itself and taxpayers while its office simply operates according to the state constitution.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://www.rob-servations.com/robs-blog.html

A progressive political insider (and meddler) in the red state of South Carolina, Rob Groce operates his own blog, ROBservations (www.rob-servations.com/robs-blog.html).
Add this Page to Facebook!   Submit to Twitter   Submit to Reddit   Submit to Stumble Upon   Pin It!   Fark It!   Tell A Friend
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Thomas Ravenel: Politics to Prison to Television - and Back to Politics?

Fake Democrats and Funky Elections in the 'Insane Asylum' of South Carolina

A New Moderate "American Party" Is Forming

A Community Response to Homophobic Legislation

Proposed State Tax Ruling Unfair, Says LGBT Advocacy Group

Mass murder, mental defects and memories

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

For both the state and applicable tax filers, this... by Rob Groce on Tuesday, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:14:18 AM