Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter
  1
Share on Facebook
  1
Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 Shares     
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats
3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 1   Touching 1   Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

opednews.com

In response to Ana Zamora's short rebuttal to my piece "Why I'd Vote for the S.A.F.E. California Act," I offer the following:

     Proposition 34 will condemn thousands of prisoners to life in prison without the possibility of parole.   Because the initiative hardens and deepens the legal supports for the other death penalty, because it norms a sentence that should be unheard of, and because it sinks the thousands already serving the sentence into a pool of quicksand even deeper than before, the whole truth is thousands of prisoners will be dying in prison.

     Proposition 34 elevates the status of second degree murder sentences of life without the possibility of parole from a statutory to a constitutional level because of the use of the initiative process.   Therefore, these crimes will be irreversible in practice.   The whole truth is neither the 1977 statutes that created life without the possibility of parole, nor the Briggs Initiative of 1978 included any second degree murder level crimes as eligible for the other death penalty.  

     Proposition 34 uses the same kind of math that politicians employ when trying to justify spending huge amounts of money some time in the future.   By weighing only the front-loaded costs, and ignoring the long-term costs of thousands of old, sick, and dying prisoners, the math adds up in their favor.   The whole truth is a more honest and all encompassing assessment would yield a different result.  

     Proposition 34 does, indeed, create a law enforcement slush fund that claims to be time limited to three years.   Assuming that the vast criminal justice empire of California is going to simply concede to the termination of this funding is naïve, at best.   The whole truth is the first job of every bureaucracy is to grow, and nobody grows better than our law enforcement agencies.  

     Finally, while I appreciate Ana Zamora's measured tone and civility, and while I'm sure we probably agree on about 99% of the issues as regards criminal justice, on this issue she's simply wrong.   This November, California voters will NOT have a chance to choose between the death penalty and an "alternate" sentence.   They will merely be choosing between methods of execution.   That is the whole truth.  

 

Kenneth E. Hartman has served 30 continuous years in the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation on a life without the possibility of parole (LWOP) sentence. He is the author of "Mother California: A Story of Redemption Behind (more...)
 
Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Prisons: Past, Present, Future

It's Time To Change The Prisons

Bad Things Happen in the Dark

Why I'd Vote for the SAFE California Act

Prop 34: Truth, Indeed, But Not The Whole Truth

Us Against The World

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As a supporter of the SAFE California Act, Proposi... by Margo Schulter on Thursday, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:47:20 PM
The 2/3 number for those favoring LWOP is a flagra... by Chris Bernstien on Tuesday, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:35:30 PM
The arguments in support of the ballot measure to ... by Chris Bernstien on Tuesday, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:24:50 PM