Tag(s): ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Inspiring 1   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/19/08:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (42 comments)

Progressivism Continues its Regression – Warren Signals Armageddon

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (8 fans)   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

December 19, 2008

 

Progressivism, I hardly knew thee. You see several years ago when we were in the middle of the nightmare that was George Bush, people banded together to believe in a better country. A better way to conduct ourselves in the world. Integrity, truth, transparency. Stop blowing up other countries because they are different than we are. Worry about our infrastructure. Worry about our kids and our educational system. The people in control were considered ideologues. They were correctly seen as dividing the country sharply against each other. It was actually part of their plan; to have us so busy sniping at each other that no one would notice when they were looting the country.

 

So we banded together with the goal of progressing past the politics of personal destruction and fear. We wanted to progress to the point where all people were considering themselves Americans first and not red or blue. We were hopeful that we could progress to the point where the right could get along with the left. Where the republican could get along with the democrat. Where the evangelical could co-exist with the homosexual. Then along came Barack Obama and his message of change and hope and everyone went ga-ga. Some voted for him because of his message resonating deep in their hearts. Some voted for him because they thought he was going to change everything just the way they wanted. Most probably voted for him because he was not Bush, which McCain clearly was. Either way, now elected it seems that Obama can do no right by some who fancy themselves progressive. Yesterday signaled Armageddon as Obama dared to select Pastor Rick Warren to give the invocation at his Inaugural Address.

 

The outcry has been shrill from the would be-progressives. Let me be clear, I am no fan of Warren. He reneged on an agreement for a simple ten question interview a couple of years back when I wrote some articles about an end-times video game he was involved with. I thought his presidential forum was not particularly balanced and his calling for the assassination of world leaders is not scriptural, despite his protests. That said, the selection of him to provide the invocation is not a sign of the end of days, nor is it a sign of betrayal that the Rachel Maddows of the world would have us believe. I have seen commentary and articles crying about how they thought and Obama election would signal the end of any evangelical voices. They thought that an Obama election would mean that anyone who says the word God must be banished from society. That is not progressive.

 

It is actually regressive. For years we have rightfully bemoaned the politics of division perpetuated against us by the forces of the neocons. They did not want the progressive voice at the table. They did not want the liberal voice at the table. They did not want the homosexual voice at the table. What was wrong with this belief system? It was exclusionary. We wanted to progress out of that system into one where everyone has a voice. It seems somewhere along the line, would-be-progressives actually had no problem with the politics of personal division; as long as they were in charge of the division. The problem of the past eight years apparently was not that voices were muted and not invited to the table but rather which voices were not allowed. Their solution is not to allow all voices but to change who is not allowed. In their vision of a divided America, the evangelical voice is not allowed at the table. The conservative voice is not allowed at the table. God is not allowed at the table. I cannot think of anything more regressive than continuing the same system of the past eight years but merely changing the groups to be excluded.

 

Rick Warren is a Pastor who has been asked to give an invocation; relax. If he was chosen to be his head of the Department of Education, I could see the panic. But he is being asked to give a prayer and like him or not, he seems pretty qualified to do that. If he was named Secretary of State, I could understand such vitriol in reaction but to give a prayer? I take it as a sign that maybe Obama will be even better than I had hoped. That maybe he will fulfill some of the original ideals of true progressivism, where everyone is allowed at the table. Where there is no division. Where what is important is what the person brings to the table, regardless of whether they are red or blue. Where even your bitter rival can be your Secretary of State. Where a pastor who did not support you can give your invocation. That’s kinda progressive to me.

 

Anthony Wade, a contributing writer to opednews.com, is dedicated to educating the populace to the lies and abuses of the government. He is a 43-year-old independent writer from New York with political commentary articles seen on multiple websites. (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
42 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Anthony by Mark Sashine on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:21:38 AM
Mark by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:41:35 AM
Ahem by Mark Sashine on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:59:52 AM
Apologies by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:55:18 PM
Anthony,The forces of progressivism by Mark Sashine on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:43:59 AM
Your comment by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:39:06 AM
Anthony tries to conflate "belief in God" with bigotry & by Richard Mynick on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 10:36:20 AM
LOL by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:57:39 PM
Rev Warren is absolutely the right choice by jersey girl on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:49:36 AM
9/11 by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:02:12 AM
Your Article by Richard Hirschhorn on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:51:45 PM
REALLY? by WML on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:10:25 PM
Progressive by William Whitten on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:28:42 PM
Your question by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:58:42 AM
"What does progressive mean"... by Starbuck on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:20:48 PM
Liberal by William Whitten on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:10:35 PM
Progressivism by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:02:50 PM
Your article by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:35:41 AM
Mr. Hirschorn by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:44:41 PM
Your definition by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:13:05 AM
Your request by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:52:02 AM
ONG 4, STUDENTS 0 by WML on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:27:57 AM
linked by kgongre on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 2:40:31 PM
Jersey Girl and All by Michael Cavlan on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 4:20:09 PM
Thanks by Reverend Anthony Wade on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:06:03 PM
AGREED by WML on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:45:50 AM
Christ is Anointed! by Garry Minor on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:01:56 PM
Gary by William Whitten on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:23:33 PM
Progressive Doesn't Mean "Liberal" by jemonk on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:56:26 PM
So progressives are.. by Starbuck on Tuesday, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:17:10 PM
Progressives by JoAnn Walker on Friday, Dec 19, 2008 at 7:40:23 PM
Progressive. by sommers on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:38:31 AM
Symbols by Richard Hirschhorn on Monday, Dec 22, 2008 at 10:50:34 AM
Love allows all things by carl on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 5:43:58 AM
Banishment by Sandy Sand on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:11:59 AM
sandy by jersey girl on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:33:03 PM
What's a progressive/liberal anyway? by coyote on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 8:50:18 AM
Your Comment by Richard Hirschhorn on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:23:46 AM
Intolerant? How about seeing the truth by Wayne Turner on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 9:23:26 AM
On the qualifications of a prayer "administrator" by Reinhold Hinz on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 4:40:09 PM
Question? by Reverend Anthony Wade on Saturday, Dec 20, 2008 at 11:49:04 PM
I'm a Liberal. What is that? Christian. by Tom Usher on Sunday, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:32:39 AM