Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 3 (8 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   3 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pro-Israel Media Bias: It's As Easy As ABC

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Valuable 2   News 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 7/11/14

- Advertisement -

Cross-posted from Antiwar

Reporting from Bizarro World, the ABC anchor tells us Israel is the perpetual victim

Poor Diane Sawyer -- recently kicked upstairs by ABC News, she started off her Wednesday report on the Israeli assault on Gaza by giving us the Bizarro World version of the latest news. In a conflict where as of this moment 86 Palestinians have been killed -- nearly all civilians, mostly women and children -- and as many as 1,000 wounded, with exactly zero casualties in Israel, Sawyer directed our attention to "the rockets raining down on Israel" -- while on the screen we saw Israeli jets pounding Gaza. Pointing to a still photo clearly of Palestinians dragging a mattress through the rubble, she described it as "an Israeli family trying to salvage what they can."

In Bizarro World -- where up is down, black is white, and truth is falsehood -- this makes perfect sense. And it kind of does in our world, too, on at least two levels.

ABC later acknowledged the "error," but one wonders: a lie, once in circulation and widely accepted, is hard to refute, no matter how many "corrections" are issued. Lots of people still think Saddam Hussein organized the 9/11 attacks, and they don't all work at the Weekly Standard. War propaganda, which is largely dependent on visual images larded with shock value, is not especially subtle. The idea is to bypass the rational mind and appeal directly to the target's emotions.

On another level, as Peter Hart over at FAIR put it, "ABC's error should be seen less as a simple mistake, and more as a reflection of a worldview." It's an intriguing idea -- intriguing because we aren't told exactly what worldview. Or whose worldview. Hart vaguely describes this unidentified bias as being a sin of "the corporate media," but what does this really mean?

All media is "corporate" in the sense that it consists of groups of people working to bring you the news and somehow making money at it -- or, in our case, as in the case of all non-neocon nonprofits, generating some income albeit barely breaking even. So what does being "corporate" -- assuming this means "for profit" -- have to do with being unabashedly pro-Israel?

- Advertisement -

It isn't just the "corporate" media that's part of the hasbara echo chamber: as Max Blumenthal points out, former Israeli prison guard Jeffrey Goldberg has been the only guest to address the current conflict on the Charlie Rose Show -- Public Television's toniest talkfest.

So if it's not a capitalist conspiracy, then what accounts for the all-pervasive pro-Israeli bias of the American media, which starts out every account of events on the ground with images of Israeli victimhood, downplaying or outright ignoring the suffering of the Palestinians, which is a hundred times greater? And how do we explain Sawyer's "error" in this context?

The Zionist project is a settler colony: that is, a foreign invasion, in this case one launched not by another nation-state but by a movement that was international in scope from the very beginning.

Starting out as a tiny minority within the Jewish communities of many nations, the Zionist organizations gradually became dominant through sheer hard work: endless proselytizing, fundraising, and organizing on a global scale. Their task was twofold: first, to convince their own people it was necessary to establish a state in Palestine, and secondly to enlist the help of the political classes of Europe -- and not just the West. In the beginning, the Soviet bloc was the biggest ally of the nascent Jewish state. Andrei Gromyko rose to defend them in the United Nations, and the Zionist militias got much of their weaponry from Soviet bloc countries.

This changed when Uncle Joe Stalin decided that Zionism, rather than being a legitimate "national liberation" movement, was in reality a plot against the Soviet Union. The problem was that the initially pro-Zionist stance of Communist parties around the world, including those in power, had encouraged so many Jews to emigrate to Palestine that the socialist countries were experiencing a brain drain and paying a high economic price. Communist officials were startled to discover that so many people wanted out of their "workers' paradise." It was time to change the party line -- by 180 degrees.

- Advertisement -

Stalin ordered a series of show trials of top Communist party officials, including the head of the Czechoslovak Communist Party, which "exposed" a "Trotskyite-bourgeois nationalist-Titoist-Zionist" conspiracy to seize power in Soviet bloc countries. The majority of the defendants were of Jewish origin. The explicitly anti-Semitic rhetoric coming out of these theatrical productions reached a Hitlerian crescendo with the infamous "Doctor's Plot," in which Jewish defendants were portrayed in terms right out of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

Ironically, this played into the hands of the Zionists, who already had their state -- thanks, in large part, to weapons sales from the Soviet bloc arsenal -- and who now had to convince Jews worldwide to emigrate to Israel. The anti-Semitic campaign of Stalin's later years did much to make the Zionists' case for them, underscoring the alleged need Jews had for a sanctuary, i.e., a state of their own.

The Soviet turnaround also forced them to turn their attention to a much wealthier and more powerful potential ally -- the political elites of the West. The British-initiated Balfour Declaration prefigured a relationship with the Western powers that can only be characterized as symbiotic -- an increasingly intimate "special relationship" that only got more special with the onset of the cold war. Faced with the Soviet-backed regimes of the Arab states on every side, the Israelis became a US outpost, supported economically by the Diaspora and militarily by the US and its allies.

But it wasn't an easy road for them to take: it wasn't their first choice, in any event, but they had to make do. The ambivalence was mutual, after all: back then, Zionism was still a liberal cause, due in part to the dominance of the Labor Zionist movement in Israel and in the Zionist organizations internationally. The Eisenhower administration tried to be evenhanded in the ongoing conflicts between Israel and its neighbors, and openly supported the Arabs in several cases. And conservative Republicans of that era, as I pointed out at the first National Conference to Reassess the US-Israel "Special Relationship," were inclined to be pro-Palestinian.

As a settler colony, the Israeli state has always been dependent on life support from abroad, which means it must direct its resources in that direction. When the Soviets turned on Tel Aviv and sided with the Arabs, the Israeli turned their sights westward -- with a vengeance.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

http://antiwar.com

Justin Raimondo is the editorial director of Antiwar.com. He is the author of An Enemy of the State: The Life of Murray N. Rothbard (Prometheus Books, 2000), Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement (ISI, 2008), (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Assange's Last Stand?

The FBI vs. Antiwar.com

The Hollow Empire

The Israel Lobby and the Road to War

Espionage, Treason, and the Congressional Fifth Column

The Sony Hack Fraud

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
2 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
The Israeli "Zionist" cause NEEDS AIPAC; Z Street;... by E. J. N. on Friday, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:28:23 PM
One day Jews, Christian and Muslims will live in p... by E. J. N. on Friday, Jul 11, 2014 at 7:38:42 PM
I believe Israel will be purged of its crimes and ... by Michael Dewey on Saturday, Jul 12, 2014 at 7:34:44 AM