Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (4 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

OpEdNews Op Eds

President Obama as "Warrior-in-chief"

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Well Said 3   Valuable 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/20/12

Cross-posted from Al Jazeera

US wars continue despite popular opposition because they are an "extension of an imperial policy that is about perceived national/economic self-interest, not values," says author [REUTERS]

When the Soviet Union collapsed, many Americans hoped that the Cold War would collapse with it, that a "peace dividend" would lead to the shrinkage of the Pentagon, and that bloated military spending would be reallocated.

The mantra of that moment was "the enemy is dead."

It was momentary.

It was soon replaced by a silent "long live the enemy," as the terror war replaced the Cold War. This war was never really just about terrorists, of course. It's largely about keeping the military-industrial complex steaming ahead with all of its jobs in key congressional districts, while sustaining the profits earned by military contractors.

A war economy always needs a war. The big secret in Washington is that American capitalism needs Pentagon socialism to survive.



The attack on the Twin Towers became a justification for a vast expansion of military activity without end. Dick Cheney predicted this new war would be a long one, estimating it could last 50 years.

Ten years of that 50 have elapsed with no real end in sight. The threat posed by Osama bin Laden was waved in our faces every day as the face of evil, even as experts on Afghanistan kept reporting that there were fewer and fewer foreign jihadis in the country. The shrinkage of their forces did not stop the media from highlighting the endless threat they represented.

'Primo enemy status'

The background was all but buried: how the US abandoned Afghanistan after the mujahedeen forces it funded drove the Soviets out. Washington stood by in silence while a civil war fought by competing warlords pulverised the country, killing 50,000 people.

The US later encouraged, recognised and began making deals with the Taliban before 9/11, because some US policymakers saw them as a "stabilizing" force -- until their brutal treatment of women and girls became too visible and led to global outrage.

After 9/11, when the US failed to nail bin Laden and al-Qaeda, the Taliban was given primo enemy status even though they were not the people that attacked us. The US went after them, and invaded their country to satisfy popular demands for payback, and, in part, because we couldn't find bin Laden's networks after he slipped away.

Is there even an al-Qaeda? Many "experts" disagree. Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that "al-Qaeda" is not really a terrorist group, but a database of international mujahedeen and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel arms and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan. They have since turned up in Pakistan, Yemen, North Africa and Syria. If it existed, it was a decentralised global movement, what Coca-Cola claimed to be -- a "multi-local corporation."

The point is, the US needed an enemy and the Taliban soon filled the bill. The US has been at war with the Taliban for a decade, but it's a war we seem to be losing and, at the same time, losing public support for.

As political scientist Michael Brenner explains:

"This endless crusade has achieved a state of perpetual motion generated by a confluence of dogmatic ideology, intellectual obstinacy, cynical political calculation and the exertions of powerful financial and professional interests. Today, the enterprise -- or at least 90 per cent of it -- looks to be divorced from reality."

Just as television morphed from factual/reality programming to reality-based programming, a terror narrative was conjured up and reinforced in all media. The media companies soon turned their programming into a comic book-like weapons system -- "weapons of mass deception".

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

News Dissector Danny Schechter is blogger in chief at Mediachannel.Org He is the author of PLUNDER: Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books) available at Amazon.com. See Newsdisssector.org/store.htm.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Is There A Threat of Fascism in the USA?

Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

COG OR COA: WHY IS OBAMA MORPHING INTO BUSH 2?

WERE THE BANKS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR THE BANKERS TOO BIG TO JAIL?

WHO OWNS OUR MEDIA AND WHY IT MATTERS

HARD TIMES ARE GETTING HARDER. ARE THEY EVER!

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
labor to subsidize the CommuFascist Corporatist We... by bogi666 on Thursday, Jun 21, 2012 at 7:13:40 AM