Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   7 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

President Obama Must Really Order An Investigation of Torture Program

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Torture is not only morally repugnant but it also seems useless as an effective means of interrogation.  Its most typical or predominant use certainly appears not in obtaining useful information for military or national security, as claimed by its proponents, but rather in attempting to extract false information from a prisoner for propaganda purposes.  A good example is the Chinese use of torture of American soldiers to obtain a false confession that the US government used germ warfare during the Korean War.  The Chinese already knew that the US troops did not use germ warfare because they did not have any evidence.  If they had evidence, they would have used that evidence to accuse the US government of germ warfare.  But since they did not have any evidence, they had to create one and that’s where they had to resort to torturing US soldiers in their captivity.  Similarly, the Nazis, the Soviet Union and other police states historically used torture predominantly on innocent people to obtain false confessions to aid their propaganda and other political purposes. 


As documented in the infamous case of the French government’s torture of Henri Alleg, the editor of the communist paper, Alger Republicain, during the Algerian War in 1957, a brutal torture is useless against a determined prisoner, whether the prisoner has any useful information to divulge or not.  (See Torture and the Twilight of Empire: from Algiers to Baghdad, by Marnia Lazreg, Chapter 9)  In contrast, it is highly effective against innocent victims, as a means of coercing false information that a corrupt government needs or wants for political purposes or to frighten its general population into silence, as demonstrated by extensive use of torture by corrupt dictatorships and police states in the past.  Perhaps we, too, should not be surprised if a full investigation were to show that the Bush/Cheney administration may have used torture, at least, in part, deliberately to obtain information to build the false WMD story for invasion of Iraq. 


All tortures only demean not only the victims as subhuman but also the perpetrators and, ultimately, all people of the communities to which the victims and perpetrators belong.  We as citizens of the United States should be proud that our predecessors had the vision to see the inhumanity of torture and the courage to initiate the worldwide effort to brand all torture as war crime and crime against humanity.  All international conventions, as well as our domestic laws, banning torture and mandating full investigation of any allegations of torture were established by the initiatives and efforts of the representatives of our own government.  Thus, the Bush/Cheney administration’s record of reversing this honorable and proud legacy of our government is an unconscionable travesty of justice and an insult to our national moral legacy and legal precedent.  To cleanse this unacceptable blemish and stigma on our national soul and heritage, it is imperative that President Obama order a meaningful investigation and prosecution of at least the leading members who instituted the Bush/Cheney administration’s torture program, whose existence has been demonstrated through public documents.  Without this national soul searching and rectification, no economic stimulus or revival would mean much to this country.     


Take action -- click here to contact your local newspaper or congress people:
Bush Torture Program Must Be Invstigated.

Click here to see the most recent messages sent to congressional reps and local newspapers

Nathan Nahm is a retired New York lawyer, with a strong interest in issues relating to individual ethics, individual liberty, human rights, peace and war, economic fairness and social justice.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Wrong With President Obama's Stimulus Package and How Should We React?

Does North Korea Really Pose a Grave Threat to the Security of the US?

Open Letter to Mr. Barack Obama

"President Hillary Clinton" vs. "President Barack Obama": Which Will Be A More Significant Historical Precedent?

The Decline of Empires in the Past, the Future of the United States and the Contribution of President Bush

President Obama Must Really Order An Investigation of Torture Program


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)
courageous then it could be. You write, of to... by Brett Paatsch on Thursday, Feb 12, 2009 at 5:08:31 PM
I don't necessarily dispute your argument, esp... by Nathan Nahm on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:27:02 AM
courageous then it could be. You write, of to... by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:58:27 AM
.... by Brett Paatsch on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:00:03 AM
Brad Your reworded heavily verb padded restat... by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:35:39 AM
I apologise, not only is your name not Brad, but y... by William Whitten on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 8:39:55 AM
Okay.  So, we all agree on the basic proposit... by Nathan Nahm on Friday, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:13:06 PM