![]() |
|
|
December 1, 2008 at 19:19:21
Plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose by Mike Malloy Page 1 of 1 page(s) |
|
|

Is that what I heard? Is that what you heard? I mean, look at the selections for key foreign policy posts announced today: Hillary Clinton at State; retired U.S. Army General James Jones, National Security Advisor; Bush appointee Robert Gates remains as Secretary of Defense. Um . . . wait . . . no . . .
Apparently, I didn't listen. I mean, I must not have listened. Because look at what's happening! My short-term memory seems to have a definite flaw. A big one. I swear a few months ago I heard Barack Obama promising change. Change! CHANGE! And, yet, nothing is changing. It's all simply reappearing. Like the ghosts of Christmases past, moving about, chains clanking, foul odors filling the room, wretched wailing echoing down the hallways.
Or reports of terror attacks in Mumbai, India, that left scores dead, hundreds wounded. Did that horrible stuff really happen during the past few days?
www.mikemalloy.com
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Contact Author |
Contact Editor |
View Authors' Articles |
|
|
|
|
| 2 comments |
|
Patience Broher
If naysaying were a genuine occupation, there would be a rising level of employment in the country as of now. First--as a reformed and aging firebrand--I empathize with your indignation. I, for one, do not really believe this system can be reformed;but professional politicos cannot afford to take that tack. Mr. Obama is not even yet president. He walks a fine line, one on which his very life depends. The human system cannot bear abrupt change. It goes into shock. Since the body politic and our entire governing apparatus is an outgrowth of us, the same holds true. We have many times been deliberately plunged into shock by the negative forces that are hell-bent on taking over--and thus killing--this nation. The divisiveness that elections cause in this country cannot heal us, regardless of the outcome. The polarities refuse to come together; we have reached, as a people, the point of no return. The carping and insistent voices screaming for immediate and radical change to be enacted-- and that it be done in precisely the way the particular advocate sees it --drown out the reasoning process. Yet politics is a game of strategy and little more. And those players in positions of power know whats at stake (whether they are in it for personal gain or for the good of all) and have a plan to achieve it. The process is fraught with potential for error and sabotage. That is one reason I do not hold out much hope. But I am willing to at least allow the People's Choice to enact his vision, without slinging poison darts to make it all the harder. If you cannot see the value in Obama including those fellow-players of his who seem to be at odds with his stated vision, then I direct you to the oft-quoted observation of Albert Einstein, who said that a problem cannot be solved from the level at which it was created. Politics-as-usual (US vs THEM)got us into this scrape, and it is going to take something quantumly different to elevate us out of it. The group he is assembling will be part of the game regardless: do you not think it is wise to try and get them involved in helping? by Randje Mitchell (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 77 comments) on Tuesday, Dec 2, 2008 at 11:47:56 AM
|
|
Reply: Interesting comment
but how does this idea you present jibe with the total lack of voices on the left in the Obama ranks? No one to air their views? And it is not because Obama is a progressive himself, he is clearly not. If he is indeed, a centrist, then should he not also be weighing the views of the left as well as those from the right? by Jack Harrington (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 676 comments [70 recommended, 0 rejected]) on Wednesday, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:59:30 PM
|
Want to post your own comment on this Article?
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tell a Friend:
|
Copyright © 2002-2009, OpEdNews |