Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 3 Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (6 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   2 comments

Life Arts

Please Purchase Responsibly: How Tiffany & Co. Can Help The OWS Movement And Still Sell A Diamond Encrusted iPad

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 11/14/11

Become a Fan
  (37 fans)
- Advertisement -

Conspicuous Consumption: "wasteful and lavish consumption expenses to enhance social prestige."* It is one of the things the OWS movement points to just as the French bourgoisie pointed to Marie Antoinette's "affair of the necklace." It was what Martin Luther pointed to in castigating the trappings of Rome. It was Imelda Marcos' shoe closet. It was Kim Kardashian's fleet of white Rolls Royces for her wedding. 

Conspicuous consumption is a direct insult to almost everyone, and while some people look upon it as a kind of social disorder (like compulsive shopping, but on a higher level), there can be no doubt that it is used not to merely elevate oneself, but to destroy what little self-respect the poor have been able to garner over time: it is not merely thumbing one's nose at a homeless person, but making certain that the homeless person feels hopeless and helpless when shown such scope or grandeur of acquisitions. 

The Luxury Market

Tiffany jewels. Prada shoes. Hermes silk scarves.  Armani suits. Beluga caviar. Rolex watches. Dom Perignon champaign. Bentley automobiles. Neiman Marcus.** Beverly Hills anything. The list goes on for as long as the rich have the stamina and buying power. But do the rich control the luxury market or does the luxury market control the rich? True, both NEED each other, but which one owns over 50% of the stock in the corporation of One Percenters? 

For my money (what little I have), it's the luxury industry that maintains control. It's the price tag (not the quality), and the rarity (not the intrinsic value) that determines status. No matter that today's good synthetic jewels can sparkle just as much, diamonds are more valuable because they are marketed as such.*** 

But with marketing control comes market responsibility as much as the items the luxury industry purveys. Like the liquor industry, the luxury industry has a duty to curb excess. 

"We Reserve The Right To Refuse Service"

- Advertisement -

A celebrity well known for her passion for jewels walks into a high end jewelry store, but upon requesting to see it's stock in the latest diamond bracelets is summarily rebuffed and told to shop elsewhere. An indignant equivalen to "WTF?!" receives the answer that she has purchased too many items there.


"Madam, we have noted that you have inappropriately purchased far too many jewels and you have not evinced the slightest bit of compassion through charitable donations or works. You obviously have no respect for others, much less the poor. We reserve the right to refuse service."

A fantastic scenario, to be sure, but one that would delight today's OWS supporters: how many of us would love to envision that happening to members of the Koch family? **** 

Just Like Liquor

- Advertisement -

If conspicuous consumption is akin to irresponsible drinking, then the luxury industry has some serious responsibility issues: it has to point out to its consumers that too much is simply too much and that CC serves no other purpose than overt ostentation intended to harm someone emotionally and psychologically. "Please drink responsibly" may not have impact (on sales) but it evinces a social awareness in the face of selfish self-indulgence. 

So why not "Please Purchase Responsibly"?

Hermes, Tiffany, Cartier, Gucci: think about it. It would at least show you've given some respect to the 99% and some thought about today's inequalities. 

Next Page  1  |  2

Rev. Dan Vojir is has been writing/blogging on religion and politics for the better part of ten years. A former radio talk show host (Strictly Books €" Talk America Radio Network) and book publisher, Dan has connected with some of the most (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Follow Me on Twitter

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Google Content Matches:
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

"Some Girls Rape Easy": Hypocrisy, Sex and The Republican War Against Women.

The End Of An Era? Praise The Lord! Televangelist Paul Crouch Dies And Leaves Behind A Life Of Decadence Beyond Belief.

Joining "Bishop" Eddie Long, Prosperity Preacher Creflo Dollar Gets Support From His Fans...ala Mommy Dearest

Forget EBOLA: The Greatest Threat To Africa's Medical Missionaries Is Ann Coulter!

The Vatican's Fake Occupy Implodes: Documents Evoke A History Of Money Laundering, Sexual Terrorism, And Even ... Murder

Holy Misogyny! Dating Advice From Megachurch Minister: "Dress Modestly And Save Yourself ... For Me!"


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Showing any form of social conscience is never rea... by Rev. Dan Vojir on Monday, Nov 14, 2011 at 10:10:54 AM
Tiffany's needs to take a stand!... by Rev. Dan Vojir on Monday, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:00:07 PM