Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 3 (5 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   10 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pivotal moment: Why US wants deal with Iran

By       Message Pepe Escobar     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 3 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H1 11/15/13

Author 73066
Become a Fan
  (156 fans)
- Advertisement -
Source: RT


The Geneva talks between Iran and the P5+1 group may have been torpedoed, but they are not sunk. The possibility of at least an interim deal on Iran's nuclear program is still on. The saga continues next Wednesday.

Here I have detailed how, and for what turgid motives, France -- acting for Israel and the House of Saud -- derailed the negotiations last week.

Yet the basic win-win rationale, in the long run, remains. Tehran needs to get rid of the vicious US/Western sanctions package. And Washington wants more leverage in Southwest Asia, and across Eurasia. 

Make no mistake; this negotiation is essentially between Washington and Tehran, despite the other players at the table. At the same time, the mere, tantalizing possibility of a deal affects the calculations of every player across Eurasia -- from Turkey to BRICS members Russia and China.

Debunking a "march to war"

The White House and the State Department are now actively spinning that for the US Congress to impose even more sanctions -- on third-party nations trading with Iran -- would be "a march to war." With negotiations failing, President Obama would have no way to stop Iran's uranium enrichment; hardliners in Tehran would prevail and go for a bomb; and Washington would be forced to attack Iran.

This makes absolutely no sense. To start with, every informed actor -- from the IAEA to the alphabet soup of US intelligence agencies and even former Israeli Defense officials -- knows that Tehran does not have a weaponized nuclear program. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei has repeatedly condemned a nuclear weapon as un-Islamic and totally off-limits.

Iran not only does not have -- or want -- a bomb; it subscribes to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). On the other hand, Israel does not care for the NPT, and is a de facto nuclear power -- with warheads in the low hundreds.

- Advertisement -

Both India and Pakistan eschewed the NPT and built nuclear weapons. This does not mean that they will use them against one another. Their bombs are part of a dissuasion mechanism.

Even considering the very remote possibility that Tehran would abandon its (unstated) policy of reaching breakout nuclear capacity (the so-called "Japanese option") and decide to go for a bomb -- without first being attacked by Israel, the US, or both -- this would also be part of a dissuasion mechanism.



Washington never sanctioned Israel. On the contrary; it always "protected" Israel's non-denial denial about being a nuclear power. India and Pakistan were also never sanctioned. So why demonize Iran?

There are, of course, a cornucopia of motives; the impenetrable, 34-year Wall of Mistrust erected between Washington and Tehran after the Islamic Revolution; the fact that Washington elites have always wanted regime change; Iran's independent foreign policy; US corporate desire to access that fabulous energy wealth, not to mention opening up a huge virgin market. 

- Advertisement -

By peddling the logic that failed negotiations would lead to war on Iran, the White House and the State Department are in fact pointing their fingers to their allies, the Likudniks in Israel and the House of Saud, who are already doing everything they can to derail Geneva. 

As for war, it is already on -- as in financial war, a de facto blockade, with a nasty package of sanctions crippling Iran's oil exports especially to the West (Asian powers, for their part, have found myriad strategies to dodge the sanctions). It's this financial war that must be defused.

Attention: Losers whining

The mere possibility of a tectonic geopolitical shift involving Iran has rankled potential "losers" -- the Saudi-Israeli axis -- to the extreme.

With a deal clinched, Tel Aviv -- who US Think Tankland always loves to exalt for bringing "balance" to the Middle East -- knows it would lose the pretext of invoking Iran's fictitious "existential threat' to divert attention from the Mother of All Problems; the occupation/apartheid system in Palestine.

As for the House of Saud, it survives thanks to the petrodollar system -- offered "protection," Mob-style, in the form of huge US weapons sales for regulating the oil market, which must be kept on the petrodollar.

Now comes a new confluence in the horizon. Iranian President Hassan Rouhani realized Tehran's formerly confrontational foreign policy must be recalibrated, as much as Obama refrained at the last minute from plunging "exceptional' America into yet another Middle East war, in Syria; that equally amounts to a confrontational foreign policy redefinition.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

Must Read 3   Valuable 3   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Pepe Escobar is an independent geopolitical analyst. He writes for RT, Sputnik and TomDispatch, and is a frequent contributor to websites and radio and TV shows ranging from the US to East Asia. He is the former roving correspondent for Asia (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Putin is driving Washington nuts

You Want War? Russia is Ready for War

Why Qatar wants to invade Syria

All aboard the New Silk Road(s)

It was Putin's missile?

Where is Prince Bandar?