Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   4 comments

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Perils of Palin, Outing of Obama -- When High & Mighties Tumble

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H4 8/29/11

Become a Fan
  (30 fans)
- Advertisement -

Palin: Never Going Away, Hopefully Not Now by campaign photo, McCain-Palin

Who imagined less then three years ago -- of four giants battling for national office -- only Joe Biden would stand alone today, his reputation intact?  Well, not AS tarnished.  Yes, the least obnoxious deserves to run for president.

Of course, it's a trick question.  Noteworthy for rocking few boats, and no Alaskan ice flows, Biden's countless terms as an intellectually mediocre, party hack immunized him from the worst fallout of a failed presidency.  Charmingly gaffe-ridden, this average Joe ends up the most likeable of the crew, unsullied by displays of bad faith, broken promises, ineptitude, and, for Repugs, truly crass, off-the-wall pandering.   

But likeability doesn't cut the hard irony: Obama's uphill chances improve by dumping Biden for any beguiling Dem from Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, or Virginia.  Obama owns Delaware's three electoral votes, but hardly the others.  

McCain, Bottom Feeder

Greatly diminished, John McCain has self-detonated, the sham "maverick" pose now aptly trashed forever.  So frantic not to lose again, he seized every racist, nativist slingshot within reach.  McCain's the walking dead, any legacy soured by scurrilous, anti-Hispanic hallucinations.  And idiotic-Cheneyesque "bomb everyone" militarism.  Yes, McCain would have been worse -- and is, senility aside.

Which leaves us with Palin and Obama, so different in biography and personality, yet whose comparable, star-crossed destinies repay study.  What?  Who dares compare an illiterate, uncompromising, whining V.P. loser-quitter -- reduced to Twitter catcalling -- with an educated, Nobel Prized, smooth-talking, compromise-loving, stay-the-course presidential winner?

First off, Palin and Obama overlap as the young, attractive, inexperienced class of hustlers born nationally in '08.  But fresh, charismatic faces, propelled by catchy oratory, came alongside big promises, thus the speed and magnitude of parallel falls from grace.  Unlike McCain, they're still in the game, fighting for respectability, if not legacy, adoration, and comfortable retirements.  Their rapid plunges follow similar meteoric rises, becoming classic models not only of media hype but what happens when juicy promises betray products NOT delivered.  Politicians lose face when they're clearly in over their heads.

- Advertisement -

Palin's '15 Minutes' Never Ends

Admittedly, Palin is unelectable nationally, though polling mid-teens against primitive Repugs.  Unlike Obama, who still boasts a whopping 50% chance of re-election, depending how off-kilter or crazed is his opponent.  Sideswiped by more calculating Tea Party nuts Bachmann and Perry, Palin looks not likely to transcend media celebrity, Christian cheerleader, or cash-cow "author;" much diminished as king-maker, she can still, however, channel takings into SarahPAC.  While a tiny 8% of surveyed GOP leaders want Palin in, her mission continues as Tea-vangelist preacher for the lucrative church of Palin.  In 2012, Palin could help in the  boonies, as Perry will in the deep south and Bachmann in the 19th C. Midwest heartland.  Be a rogue: run, Sarah, run.

Without doubt, whatever slick, media-friendly pitches Palin and Obama foisted on us in '08, almost all are discredited, thus their collective, precipitous plunges in approval.  However Palin differs from Obama, heart-driven loyalists show little mercy when slapped by: 1) bad faith losers or quitters, 2) hypocrisy, 3) craven ambition, or 4) betrayals of great and explicit promise.  Don't blame me: I am just the messenger.

Buyer's Remorse -- or Reality?

Even "fool me twice" rightwing numbskulls won't abide chronic losers, keen for stupider sound bites but from fresher sources.  Did not Palin and Obama proclaim, above all, "we're different -- up from, by and for the people, not self-interested, money-driven politicians."  Oops, as treasure totally rules Palin while Obama hunts up a billion dollar war chest.  Quitting office, like knowing how to fight hard, is not for Obama, but both newcomers stay true to their highly pragmatic, even bankable "objects of desire."  It ain't about helping the poor, sick, or oppressed.

- Advertisement -

Frankly, mass revulsion against unsuccessful hustling made visible is perfectly rational (a rarity in our times).  Voters just got stung with how phony, ill-prepared politicians operate, especially under stress.  Even two high-quality, political "performance artists" must face the music when the gaps between supply (their skills) vs. demand (reality) are broadcast far and wide.  Well, perhaps Palin never agreed to learn the art of politics, or get beyond sound bites.  Enough voters have learned (or were forced to learn) who Palin and Obama were all along (ambitious lightweights, easily bored, eager for some next gig) and what they're likely to do -- and not do, like risk political capital to satisfy principles.  Rogues and mavericks, every one.

Does Obama Get Ignition?  

Truth is, the mock debt-ceiling crisis, combined with rightwing attacks on Social Security and Medicare, look like GOP general election death traps.  The Repug irrationality to pitch only ideological "2010 voters" will backfire, as big majorities, however pissed off, reject extremist blather about "good" defaults.  Hogwash. With the right boxing itself into tighter corners, the incredibly inert Obama hasn't lost it all yet, and Andrew Hacker finds positive trends:

Next Page  1  |  2


Northern California, region. For a decade, Robert S. Becker's rebel-rousing essays on politics and culture analyze overall trends, messaging and frameworks, now featured author at OpEdNews, Nation of Change and RSN. He appears regularly at (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Summer in the GOP Asylum: "Who are these guys?"

Trickle-down Gulf Wreck-onomics

"Apocalypse Now' Vogue Engulfs Chicken Littles

Moses Kaput -- Rightwing Ten Commandments To Serve Looming Theocracy

Deadline Looms To Fund Critical Ocean Plastic-Trash Film

"God Particle' Refudiates the Religious Right


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

That's easy to see.  But what can we learn by... by Robert S. Becker on Monday, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:36:08 PM
Sums it up in a nice little nutshell.... by Geoyce Chatman on Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 12:40:39 AM
Who cares what this self-serving dimwit does or sa... by Dennis Kaiser on Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:00:29 AM
Mr. Kaiser:Where do I quote her, or present what s... by Robert S. Becker on Wednesday, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:52:47 AM