Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 17 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (18 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   1 comment

Exclusive to OpEdNews:
General News

Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Put On Hold, But Damage Done

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H2 10/2/12

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)
- Advertisement -

Pennsylvania Voter ID Law Put On Hold, But Damage Done

A Pennsylvania judge put on hold a controversial law that would have required voters to present a photo id to vote saying that there hadn't been enough time for many of those who need an id to get one.

Supporters of the law say it is needed to prevent voter fraud. Critics of the law claim that it is all about suppressing the vote of the minority, poor, and elderly who generally vote Democrat.

If you have any doubt that these laws are more about politics than election integrity just watch this video of   Republican Pennsylvania lawmaker Mike Turzai stating that the law ""is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania""

When asked about allegations of the law being politically motivated, backers consistently claim that such laws are very much needed to prevent voter fraud. In reality, actual voter fraud cases are extremely rare numbering in the single digits even in large states like Texas and even during presidential election years when voter turnout is greatest.

- Advertisement -

The state of Pennsylvania has even stated that there has never been a case of "in-person" voter fraud in their state. When voter fraud does occur it generally involves absentee voting. Laws requiring photo id do not address concerns over absentee voting, only in-person voting. Statistics show that over 700,000 Pennsylvania voters do not have a driver's license and therefore, probably don't have a photo id.

Still, opponents of the Pennsylvania law say that the damage is done. Voters have been told that they will need a photo id and this will keep some of them away on election day even though it is no longer true.

Likewise, in Texas, the effort to purge voter rolls of the deceased has led to thousands of people, alive and well, getting notices from the state of Texas that they were dead and they had 30 days to prove otherwise before being removed from the voter rolls. In Harris County alone the County Clerk's office had hundreds of calls from people who received such letters saying that they were not dead but very much alive.

In spite of a lawsuit that resulted in a judge ordering the purge of dead voters to not take place before the election, many are concerned that the word will not get out that the live voters are good to go for election day causing many to just stay home rather than deal with some resulting hassle at polling places.

With a "win at any cost" attitude, some politicians have given our democracy a black eye. Let's hope this presidential election is not a repeat of 2000 when we all learned what butterfly ballots, hanging chads, and scrubbing of voting rolls were which all led to an election decided by the Supreme Court.

- Advertisement -


A graduate of the State University of New York at Buffalo with an MBA in 1980, John went into the banking business from 1981-1991. John went into the gymnastics business with his wife, with whom he has two children, in 1992 and grew it enough by (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What is a Socialist Anyway?

Healthcare Forum a Big Success, But Reveals Divisions

The Civil Rights Act of 2010?

Two opposing viewpoints of Obama's speech in light of the Israeli/Palestinian Conflict


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This kind of thing has been going on for a very lo... by John Basel on Tuesday, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:02:22 PM