Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H2) on 8/12/09:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (20 comments)

Pelosi Is An Expert At 'Drowning Out Opposing Views'

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend
Get Embed HTML Code
By Jodie Evans  Posted by Jodie Evans (about the submitter)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Disruption of the healthcare town hall meetings has triggered some rich debate about free speech in the U.S. In these discussions, CODEPINK has been referenced several times as the group who has most often tested the boundaries of free speech.

Over the years, we've been chided and insulted by the media, Members of Congress, former Press Secretaries, and even President Bush himself. However, when Nancy Pelosi weighed in recently on the townhall "mobs," saying that "drowning out opposing views is un-American," I was compelled to respond.

While the frequent mentions of CODEPINK in these discussions do not surprise me, it saddens me that there are so few groups from the past decade to reference when talking about pushing the edge of healthy debate. Congress has been failing the people in so many ways for so long that there should have been a non-stop primal scream from the people to wake the our representatives up from their corporate-funded stupor.

But who would have heard them? For far too long, the American people have been cut off from and out of the political process without any real avenues of letting their voices be heard. So when Speaker Pelosi

"" no stranger to drowning out opposing views "" talks about "drowning out opposing views is un-American," the statement is steeped with irony.

For example, CODEPINK attended Nancy Pelosi's last town hall meeting in January of 2006. Let me be clear - these town halls are one of very few ways for the people to voice their opinions, and CODEPINK does not disrupt healthy debate at these events, as some of the protesters have done at recent healthcare town halls.

At this event, CODEPINK cofounder Medea Benjamin, was the first in line to ask a question. After her question was ignored (no answer was given), CODEPINK members stood quietly in the front of the room with their banner. No screaming, no verbal attacks or threats of violence, no disruption of the other voices in the room.

At the time of the meeting, Pelosi had announced she'd taken the impeachment of George Bush "off the table," choosing her "popularity" and conservative funding sources over her constitutional duty. Millions of Americans were not happy but Pelosi refused to have any other town halls for the rest of Bush's term, effectively "drowning out opposing views." Today, over three years later, she continues to work at locking out debate about single payer in the Congressional hearings on healthcare.

In the media surrounding the healthcare town halls, protesters disruptions have been compared to CODEPINK's presence in Congress. This is comparing the proverbial apples to oranges and doesn't distinguish Congressional hearings from the public-centered townhalls.

In Congressional hearings, the discussion is all too often one-sided, with the voice of the people woefully absent. We seek to expand the conversation and introduce the elephants in the room, most often we've delivered our message with our choice of costume or the messaging on our signs and t-shirts. We do this after we have exhausted every other remedy to express our opinions - after we've called, written letters, delivered petitions, brought activists to DC from around the country and met with our representatives. We resort to non-violent direct actions when there is no other way to get the message across.

We've understood, regrettably, when we go to a hearing that if we stand up and deliver the message that it is quite probable that we will be arrested. Our 'outbursts' are not meant to shut-down conversation. They're meant to join it where we have been shut out. This does not seem to be the motive of the healthcare protestors, who appear to be upset that the topic is even being visited.

However, what is most sobering about this "debate about debate" is that here, in this country that considers itself to be the most democratic in the world, dissent is so rare and so frightening. We need dissent now more than ever. Our representatives have just forked over $10 trillion to Wall Street and another $100 billion for wars.

We should all be attending town halls right now and asking the hard questions, demanding accountability. Our representatives need to feel our anger at the wholesale selling out of everything we value. But this can only happen when we have all the facts and when we respect the other voices in the room. We absolutely must demand to be heard -but never through violence and never at the expense of silencing others!

 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Editor

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
20 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Definition of a BWOT by John Little on Wednesday, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:40:53 PM
So what do you suggest? by Raphael Sidelman on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:33:19 PM
double standard by Josh Mitteldorf on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:43:52 AM
"...perfectly legal protests from the left..." by Jill Herendeen on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:20:01 PM
When Will We Say, Enough! by Joe Walsh on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:24:18 AM
The Flavor and Focus of Oppression by Dan Mage on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 10:30:12 AM
I prefer the approach of PDA by Don Smith on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:20:13 AM
Two wrongs still don“t make a right by Eugene Elander on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:06:10 PM
I disagree strenuously with this assessment Eugene by Steven Leser on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:58:51 PM
Polosi Is An Expert At 'Drowing Out Opposing Views' by David H Abernathy on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:28:30 PM
The Republicrats by John Little on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:09:49 PM
We mauw-mauwed Pelosi once by Paul Karsh on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:12:42 PM
Pelosi is a disappointing tool by LanceThruster on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:29:57 PM
Why Pelosi took impeachment (and prosecution) off the table by Don Smith on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:44:21 PM
lest we 4-get by shirley reese on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 9:10:23 PM
what you can do by Richard Pietrasz on Thursday, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:09:38 PM
What can you do? by Bryan Emmel on Friday, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:06:34 AM
"If anyone knows of a crime" Pelosi by Lance Ciepiela on Friday, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:21:22 AM
Thank you, Code Pink and Jodie Evans by Samuel Bryan on Friday, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:41:28 PM
Mind-numbing hypocrisy by Scott on Sunday, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:27:48 PM