Original published at RT
At the moment, the world is watching in horror as Israel is conducting the latest stage in its seemingly endless and relentless campaign of extermination aimed at the population of the Gaza strip.
That little piece of land (counting a grand total of 360 km or a landmass smaller than the tiny Isle of Man possessing a whopping 572 km ) has been turned into an "open air prison" for 1.657 million Palestinians unable to leave or hide. The majority of the mainstream media across the globe, in contrast, appears willfully unaware of the actual circumstances on the ground and publicly supports Israel's "right to defend itself."
Originally, the 1947 United Nations Partition Plan assigned Gaza to the Arab Palestinian state, but in the course of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War, Egypt occupied Gaza City and on 22 September 1948 the Arab League (with the exception of Jordan) recognized the All-Palestine Government set up in the Egyptian-controlled Gaza Strip. As a result, Arab states were then in a position to wash their hands of any kind of responsibility or involvement and abandoned the Palestinians to face the Israelis on their own. Even though since then many things have changed and many Arab-Israeli battles have been fought, most notably the 1967 war that changed everything, and also brought the Americans into the fray, today Arab nations persist in this lackadaisical attitude of leaving the Palestinians to their own devices.
As such, even the Jerusalem Post's Ariel Ben Solomon remarked upon this surprisingly unsurprising fact, declaring that "Arab newspapers are still giving top coverage to the conflict [in Gaza], but it is not appearing to be dominating the news," as if the World Cup in Brazil (which came to an end last Sunday) were a matter of greater interest.
Solomon even disclosed that the "Jordanian Ad-Doustour newspaper, wrote that it is completely clear that many of the countries in the region are waiting for this round of fighting to stop in order to resume their usual issues as though nothing happened."
The picture that thus emerges shows us that only the Shi'ite state of Iran is now effectively lending the Palestinians a helping hand, Mohammadi Araqi the Deputy Head of the Iranian Red Crescent Society, declaring that the "Iranian Red Crescent Society is prepared to help the Palestinians through sending medical and welfare aid."
At the same time, Turkey, another non-Arab yet a staunchly Sunni nation in the region, has announced that it will send foodstuffs and other urgent aid material worth $1 million in support of the Palestinians in Gaza. Turkey's Prime Minister, the incredibly popular yet equally divisive Recep Tayyip Erdogan personally gave the orders to Turkey's Cooperation and Coordination Office.
Ever since his "One Minute" stunt at Davos in 2009, Erdogan very much likes to portray himself as Palestine's best and only friend in the region. It therefore should come as no surprise that the internet was abuzz with news that Khaled Meshal had secretly visited Ankara at the beginning of this month to secure Turkish support against an Israeli attack. These rumors have since been denied, but that Erdogan's AKP is sympathetic to Hamas, as an outgrowth of the Muslim Brotherhood, is a well-known fact.
In this context, the Washington-based foundation for Defense of Democracies released a report on Terrorism Finance in Turkey a few months ago, even appending the ominous subtitle, A Growing Concern. Its author Jonathan Schanzer, a prolific scholar in Middle Eastern studies, does not mince his words, accusing Turkey of trying to "integrate Hamas ... into what appeared to be the new regional order" -- a design that went bankrupt after the fall of Mohammad Morsi in Abdel Fattah el-Sisi's "coup-that-wasn't-a-coup" last summer.
Even though Schanzer's case appears flimsy at best, the report nevertheless concludes that Turkey's AKP government is a major source of income for the Palestinian resistance movement (the acronym Hamas stands for á¸¤arakat al-Muqawamah al-Ê¾Islamiyyah or 'Islamic Resistance Movement'), which is all but a statement of fact. A fact that really does not constitute any great concern as Hamas is not designated as a terrorist organization by either the UN or Turkey.
Hamas is after all a multi-layered organization, comprising three separate wings: one responsible for social welfare, another for political action, and finally also a specifically military section, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, formed in 1992 and arguably responsible for Hamas' terrorist label in the US (granted by the overly hawkish Madeleine Albright's State Department in 1997, "in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA))."
Even though Hamas is now part of the Palestinian unity government, abiding by the conditions stipulated by the EU and the US, Israel persists in vilifying the organization as a terrorist network bent on the destruction of Israel. In spite of the fact that the current Israeli onslaught came in response to the killing of three hapless Jewish teenagers, the official rhetoric as well as the mainstream media's focus has now turned to the rockets launched from Gaza.
Benjamin Netanyahu and various members of his government refer to these "primitive rocket attacks," using the ever-outspoken Norman Finkelstein's words, as providing the real reason for Israel's asymmetrical offensive on multiple targets in the Gaza strip: Israeli missiles do hit civilian targets, killing and wounding numerous Palestinians in the process: while rockets from Gaza either get intercepted by Israel's Iron Dome (an "effective, truck-towed mobile air defense system developed by Rafael Advanced Defence Systems") or merely land on empty plots of land, killing and wounding no-one as a result. In other words, the legitimate self-defense argument seems more than spurious, as the Iron Dome system appears more than well-suited to emasculate Palestinian projectiles.
Lately some voices have emerged indicating that the recently discovered hydrocarbon reserves off the Gaza coast constitute a better explanation for Bibi's currently inflamed belligerence. As worded by ever-eloquent Pepe Escobar, this is what constitutes the "[b]igger [and largely unseen] [p]icture -- the 122 trillion cubic feet of gas plus the potential 1.6 billion barrels of oil in the Levant Basin spread over the territorial waters of Israel, Syria, Lebanon, Cyprus and -- of course -- Gaza." After all, as I wrote earlier it has always been about the oil, quoting Professor Michael Schwartz paraphrasing Bill Clinton's speech-writer James Carville.
1 | 2