Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   No comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Pakistan's Security of Nuclear Arsenal in the News after Taliban Attack

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 8/20/12

Symbol, nuclear WMD

The latest news out of Pakistan is some Taliban fighters attacked an air base some 37 miles north of the capitol Islamabad that "could" have been housing nuclear weapons. The attack was repelled with only a fighter plane and an airplane hangar damaged. Pakistan denied any nuclear weapons were present at the site.

Of course the attack made news here in the U.S. because of Pakistan's alleged lax security in protecting its nuclear arsenal (which they vehemently deny).

But this supposed lack of security has been a constant reminder planted in the minds of the American public over the years and promoted by the U.S. media particularly the idea of terrorists being able to steal a Pakistani nuclear weapon and detonating it over the U.S.

The propaganda surrounding such an occurrence has escalated ever since the U.S. invasion of neighboring Afghanistan in 2001. Chattering insinuations by the talking heads over Pakistan's unstable government, its ambivalence in following U.S. insistence of being more diligent in going after the Taliban inside the country, the alleged ties between the Pakistani security apparatus (ISI) and the Taliban, plus their alleged knowledge of and supposed sanctuary of Osama bin Laden (before U.S. Special OPS took him out) has also contributed to the suspicion and lack of trust over the country's security of its nuclear arsenal.    

Thus the underlying buzz in the U.S. media remains how secure are Pakistan's nuclear weapons and how likely is it for terrorists to get their hands on one.

Now let's be clear; any attack using nuclear weapons is insane and security of all existing weapons should be a top priority. And of course elimination and banning of all nuclear weapons should be the world's number one goal, but that's a discussion for another day.

For now let's dwell on the probability of terrorists somehow stealing a nuclear weapon and ask the following questions:

-          How would they transport it?

-          How would they be able to conceal it?

-          Lastly, how would they be able to detonate it?

First of all stealing a nuclear weapon by terrorists would bring about the biggest manhunt of all time. Even putting the weapon on a truck or a van and hiding it in a warehouse would be a monumental effort; then getting it moved and transported by a vehicle onto a plane or more likely into a container and on to a transport ship. How would they be able to detonate it without the launch codes and other safety measures build into the device? Also it being a nuclear device wouldn't it have a footprint and be detected?

Well enough of this cat and mouse game. From here, the reality of a nuclear weapon being stolen, then transported and detonated by terrorists is so unlikely and far fetched it should be kept in the realm of science fiction. There's a greater likelihood of aliens invading than terrorists acquiring and detonating a nuclear device.

But lastly, if such a scenario of terrorists acquiring a nuclear device and detonating it has any validity, then why hasn't there been a national debate about it? Would openly discussing and highlighting it make it more likely to happen?

It just seems we need a debate on terrorism in general. How many people are aware there's a better chance of being killed by lightening than being killed by a terrorist.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

dglefc22733@aol.com

Retired. The author of "DECEIT AND EXCESS IN AMERICA, HOW THE MONEYED INTERESTS HAVE STOLEN AMERICA AND HOW WE CAN GET IT BACK", Authorhouse, 2009

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

The Danger of an Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
No comments