Tags for This Article:

Media (2943)  History (1005)  Other (807)  Women (536)  Hillary Clinton (504)  Hillary Clinton (278)  Clinton (48)  HILLARY CONCEDES (15)  Suffrage (3) 

Populum Tag Cloud
       Control Panel
Fine tune your search to access content
Articles
Diaries Products
Events All
All time
Last 6 mos
Last month
Last week
Last 24 hrs
From:
Month  Day   Year

To:
Month  Day   Year
Alphabet
Popularity
Count ON
Count OFF
This Level
Sub-levels

 

 

 

Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Add to My Group
June 5, 2008 at 22:52:05

Headlined on 6/5/08:
Our Hillary Lesson

by kellie bean     Page 1 of 1 page(s)

www.opednews.com

 

Tell A Friend

(0.0 from 0 ratings) View Ratings | Rate It

Our Hillary Lesson

As the first viable female candidate for president, Hillary Clinton dramatically raised the bar for women, but not for media commentary. And that , sadly, is precisely a function of her gender. 

It’s not news that it’s a confusing time to be a woman calling herself a feminist, looking for signs of progress and avoiding the familiar pitfalls and disappointments of sexist culture. Take for example, tiger print lingerie for pre-teens, nose and boob jobs as graduation gifts. Consider women pathologized as “tanorexics,” domesticated in knitting clubs and pimped out in “queen for a day” weddings. Notice that the biggest female celebrities compete not for humanitarian or acting awards, but to see who can produce the largest litter fastest. And the biggest movie of last weekend?—the  one featuring women tottering on sky-high heels, poured into body crushing  fashions, and sexing up an entire city.

Still, there are signs of hope. A female Speaker of the House, more women serving in Congress than ever before, and women outnumbering men on college campuses. Oh, and a woman running for President.  No matter how one feels about Hillary as a candidate, she has been a candidate, fully involved in the political mix, a viable, loved and loathed, politicking player on our culture’s largest stage. And she came to play. She swaggers, she entreats, she apologizes, refuses to apologize, equivocates and tells it like it is. She actually was Running. For.  President.

Yet commentary in the MSM remains moored in the hopeless mess of sexist parsing and sniping. Pundits from the sophomoric Chris Matthews to the dignified Barbra Ehrenreich, all find Hillary fair-er game, I would argue, than her masculine counterparts. Thick ankles? Check. Cleavage? Yup. Female voice? ‘fraid so.  

Even Ehrenreich abandons her characteristic equanimity to find Ms. Clinton’s politicking not just disappointing but evidence of “female moral inferiority.” Paradoxically, one recent study blames female moral superiority for expansion of government programs; women are more likely to endorse publically assisting others, according to this FoxNews analysis, so blame Big Government on women’s suffrage. One of the best selling books on women’s issues currently rehashes the familiar, overdone and simplistic, “He’s a Stud, She’s a Slut” double standard.  Distracting, easy to read, and entirely beside the point, such analysis fails to engage the genuine potential of this woman’s historic run for president.

Such commentary, in fact, discourages our seeing history making at all by treating women and women’s issues as special cases, sui generis, and therefore likely to run their course without leaving much impression on the status quo. Of course, this trend stings even more when forwarded by women.

True equality must render women thoroughly subject and accountable to the rules of the political games we engage, for insisting on anything like inherent moral exceptionality threatens to render us too delicate, special, or weak to participate fully in an often ugly world—a strategy which accounts for the burning of witches, genital mutilation and Purity Balls.  As I’ve written elsewhere of female involvement in the horrors of Abu Ghraib, women are “merely and entirely human, fallible, and entitled to participate in the world in all its violence, horror, wonder and beauty as fully as men do.”

Hillary’s flawed character, untidy run and final resistance to defeat testifies to her political identity, to her exceptional ambition, and, finally, to the possibility of women’s full participation in all things political, messy, moral, and otherwise.

 

Dr. Bean is an Associate Professor of English at Marshall University. She is the author of "Post-Backlash Feminism: Women and the Media Since Reagan/Bush" (McFarland & Co. 2007). She is Women and Media editor for OpEdNews.com.

Contact Author
Contact Editor
View Other Articles by Author

 

Bookmark this page: (what's this?)

NETSCAPE      DIGG THIS      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Tag!RawSugar      Blink List     (More...)
Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
7 comments

Steven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

Steven LeserSteven Leser specializes in Politics, Science & Health, and Entertainment topics. He has held positions within the Democratic Party including District Chair and Public Relations Chair within county organizations.

Steven Leser writes for www.opednews.com, an internet only media site that has grown to become one of the highest traffic news sites in America, reaching more traffic, according to alexa.com, than all but the thirty largest daily newspapers in the US. Mr. Leser is one of t...

to see more of bio, click on member name

The issue I have with characterizations like these...

... your entire thesis reduces to "she lost because she was a woman".

I dont think that is true at all. I think the vast majority of Democrats, whose nomination she is seeking, wanted to nominate a woman or an African American this time around. I think if either Obama or Hillary had been positioned against a white male, the white male would have been thoroughly trounced.

Since Democrats had the option of two historic, glass-ceiling-shattering firsts, they looked at for what each stood and made a decision based on that.

Hillary hurt herself terribly vis-a-vis going against someone like Obama by voting for the Iraq War Resolution. That vote caused a contrast between the two on peace vs war, judgement and diplomacy that was ever present in a race for the hearts and minds of a Democratic electorate sick and tired of the war, upset at the administration lying to them to justify the war and concerned about another drumbeat leading to perhaps another war, this time with Iran. Lo and behold, Hillary was supporting the drumbeat to THAT potential new war as well.

Hillary hurt herself further in this area by, like McCain is doing now, ridiculing Obama's stated desire to meet with the heads of the countries with whom we have the least friendly relations. For Democrats and others on the political left, such meetings and diplomatic overtures make sense. I would even go so far as to say they are 'common' sense to us. Making the argument that a President should NOT meet such leaders, as Hillary did during the campaign, did NOT make sense and fed into another perception of her and of the team of her and her husband.

Hillary and Bill have this whole legacy of triangulation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangulation_(politics) . That might be fine for the furthest right of the Democratic Party, ie those who support or are members of the DLC, but for more mainstream and also progressive Democrats, they want a President who more reflects mainstream Democratic thought. In Bill Clinton's races for the White house, he and his team told the progressive wing of he party to be patient, that they would get some things too as long as they didnt become so vocal that they spoiled his run for the White House.

Progressives didnt end up getting much of anything from the Clinton years. I think that perception led directly to Nader's candidacy in 2000 and thus the loss of the White House to 'W' and the neocons.

Also, this race shaped up as one between experience and change. Hillary eschewed the change movement for experience. The Democratic electorate BADLY wants change from what is happening now. There is also a valid question concerning exactly what is the experience claimed by Hillary?

Lets also not forget that African Americans make up around 20-25% of the Democratic Party electorate and they felt it was their time and many of us agreed. Of course, that agreement was easy to make with such a charismatic and likeable candidate. Characterizing that support as 'voting against the woman' is neither fair nor accurate.

Kellie, there is much more going on here than "She lost because she is a woman" or "the press pilloried her because she is a woman". I hope that after Obama the next President is a woman. But I hope that woman is much more progressive and that she is a third wave feminist http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-wave_feminism . Hillary always seemed so second wave to me http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_wave_feminism and I think real women have moved far past what the second wave represents.

by Steven Leser (193 articles, 37 quicklinks, 32 diaries, 1299 comments) on Friday, June 6, 2008 at 6:18:48 AM
 


I am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.
carol harperI am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.

Our Hillary Lesson

I contend Hillary doesn't have any more character flaws than anyone else running for President in this election. 

The media and some people chose not to dwell on the character flaws of the male candidates. Obama bragged insistently he did not vote to give authorization to the President to go to war even though the intelligence indicated a country with radical leadership had nuclear weapons. His position was much more of a crap shot given the intelligence at the time. No one could have known how skewed our trusted intelligence was except the President. The media has only dwelled on the correct way he voted and not the consequences if he had been wrong.

Obama is friends with some of the most questionable characters in recent politics; drug parties, payment contributions for Obama's home even with the large salaries he and his wife make, indicating the Obama's greed or inability to manage money. There have been Obama's lies about not knowing about his ministers political leanings from the last 20 years even though his minister openly preached them.

There would be volumes written about the Republicans; the most despicable group of juvenile delinquents ever to hold power in the White House.  

Why cast so many stones at Hillary?

 

by carol harper (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 16 comments) on Saturday, June 7, 2008 at 10:26:07 AM
 


I am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.
carol harperI am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.

Our Hillary Lesson

I contend Hillary doesn't have any more character flaws than anyone else running for President in this election. 

The media and some people chose not to dwell on the character flaws of the male candidates. Obama bragged insistently he did not vote to give authorization to the President to go to war even though the intelligence indicated a country with radical leadership had nuclear weapons. His position was much more of a crap shot given the intelligence at the time. No one could have known how skewed our trusted intelligence was except the President. The media has only dwelled on the correct way Obama voted and not the consequences if he had been wrong.

Obama is friends with some of the most questionable characters in recent politics; drug parties, payment contributions for Obama's home even with the large salaries he and his wife make, indicating the Obama's greed or inability to manage money. There have been Obama's lies about not knowing about his ministers political leanings from the last 20 years even though his minister openly preached them.

There would be volumes written about the Republicans; the most despicable group of juvenile delinquents ever to hold power in the White House.  

Why cast so many stones at Hillary?

 

by carol harper (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 16 comments) on Saturday, June 7, 2008 at 10:28:01 AM
 


Earl of Stirling, Hereditary Governor and Lord Lieutenant of Canada. Author of CASH FOR PEERAGES: THE SMOKING GUN (Lulu Press at www.lulu.com/content/953682). Web site: http://europebusines.blogspot.com/
Lord StirlingEarl of Stirling, Hereditary Governor and Lord Lieutenant of Canada. Author of CASH FOR PEERAGES: THE SMOKING GUN (Lulu Press at www.lulu.com/content/953682). Web site: http://europebusines.blogspot.com/

Progress....now lets follow up with Caroline Kennedy as VP

Hillary Clinton has made an historic run for President. The trouble was who she is and the type of politics that she represented. If President-to-be Obama wants to build on the good aspects of Hillary's run, he should select Caroline Kennedy as his running mate.

Stirling

by Lord Stirling (18 articles, 0 quicklinks, 3 diaries, 117 comments) on Saturday, June 7, 2008 at 2:09:47 PM
 


I am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.
carol harperI am an American woman from the baby boomer generation who is in the majority but has been treated as a minority my entire life.

Oh, now she would be appropriate

She strikes me as extremely naive. I was stunned at the idiots thinking her brother should run for President-but now knowing how stupid America was electing George W. Bush the first time much less re-electing him tells me anything could happen in this current race also.

We should all know by now that graduating from prestigious schools and having powerful families doesn't necessarily make a person qualified for positions of importance. The isolation and sense of entitlement they are raised with, more often than not makes them the last people who should represent the masses.

I'm in Mississippi living the real deal, not the biased, prejudiced fairy tale version Hollywood and any other bleeding heart liberals think is going on.

by carol harper (0 articles, 0 quicklinks, 0 diaries, 16 comments) on Sunday, June 8, 2008 at 12:34:43 PM
 

 

7 comments

 

Tell A Friend

 


Copyright © OpEdNews, 2002-2008

Blog Ads

 

 

 

 

Most Popular Articles
in the Last 2 Days
(by Recommend Emails)

Sarah Palin, A Wolf in Moose Clothing by Anthony Wade

John McCain: Morally, Mentally, and Emotionally Unfit by Jim Fetzer

Librarians Against Sarah Palin Founder a Mystery by Judy Swindler

Iran War ~ How It Will Unfold by Lord Stirling

Protester who interrupted McCain's speech is an Iraq War Veteran by Mary MacElveen

Live OEN Street Medic Report From Occupied St Paul by Michael Cavlan

IS SARAH PALIN SATAN? by Sherman Yellen

Is McCain Campaign Interfering In Alaska Troopergate Investigation of Palin? by Rob Kall

Sarah Palin: Small Mind In A Big Little Town by Judy Swindler

Why We're Planning to Prosecute Cheney and Bush by David Swanson

Popularity Navigation
Control Panel:

Select Time
6 hrs 12 hrs
1 Day 2 Days
3 Days 1 Week
2 Weeks 1 Month
2 Months 3 Months
6 Months Last Year
Select Content
Articles Diaries
Polls Events
All Op-Eds
News Life/Arts/Science
Select Popularity
Page Views
# of Comments
Recommend Emails
  

Go To Top 50 Most Popular