Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

Permalink
View Article Stats      (16 comments)

Article V Convention: A Uniquely American Solution to Tyranny

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan   -- Page 1 of 1 page(s)

opednews.com

Conventions, as a means of amending written constitutions, are a distinctly American institution. In fact, written constitutions originated in this country. The word constitution is used on both sides of the Atlantic to signify something superior to legislative acts: a single text of fundamental principles of government beyond the control of a legislature.

 

A constitution is a social agreement--a compact, a covenant, a contract--by which the whole society agrees with each citizen, and each citizen with their society; that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good; that government is based upon a contract between a people and a state--as opposed to a contract between a people and a god.

The American colonies were bound not only by the terms of the unwritten British constitution, but more directly by charters (think corporation). These charters, of course, became suspended the moment the colonies declared independence. The colonists then organized to create new social contracts. Each colony made its contract embody fundamental principles. In fact several of the colonies re-adopted their British charters to serve as constitutions.

The political experience and theories of the colonists thus supplied four principles:

1) The employment of definite written instruments, prescribing the nature and form of government. 2) The idea of a constitution superior to ordinary legislation. 3) The conception of certain natural rights asserted by such a constitution. 4) The theory of the social contract--the written constitution, born in America--was the embodiment of these four principles.

As you may or may not know, our Constitution has written into it a convention clause. Over the years this clause has been erroneously referred to as a “constitutional convention.” But because the U.S. Constitution is unique in all political history, its convention clause is too, and is properly referred to as the Article V Convention.

This convention specific to our Constitution has very clearly defined powers, as the framers did not leave such affairs to chance. The Article V Convention can only propose ideas, it cannot ratify them. If America were to one day find a tipping-point majority of citizens fed up enough with the officials who currently people its government, and the call for a national convention were coerced out of the legislature, the inevitable would follow: the states would hold special elections for their delegates; those delegates would convene in the capitol on a date; once assembled, those delegates would then propose ideas for a 28th Amendment to our Constitution; once all amendment proposals were on the table, the convention would adjourn, and the ratification process would begin; once any of the proposed amendments garnered the approval of 38 states, it would become part of our constitution.

Because the bar for ratification is set at an approval rating of 75%, it means whatever the idea for the amendment is, whether a conservative idea or liberal, it must get all of one side signed on, plus at least half of the other. In other words, ratification sanctifies the popular will. In the past there have been arguments against the Article V Convention based on the notion that simply discussing an idea in public might somehow accidentally turn into a new law.

Such fears should more properly be applied to the runaway government (corporate charters) currently operating in our capitol.

We are taught that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are our premier founding documents, but we are not taught that the former was written into the latter: the Article V Convention.

 

I'm a writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. I've been an advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Absolutely NOT by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:37:36 AM
hang on a minute by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:36:33 PM
Open your minds by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31:57 PM
thanks for the info joel by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:04:44 PM
Walker v Members of Congress et al by Harold Hellickson on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:24:52 PM
ever be hell by Harold Hellickson on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:58:27 PM
it's about getting enough people aware of it by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:14:27 PM
To what end by Anti Vigilante on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:55:22 PM
to secure the voting process by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:56:49 PM
hanging by Anti Vigilante on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:11:56 PM
The Vote by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:02:56 PM
John, we have so many closed minds right here in OEN by Wolfie on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:54:38 PM
hi wolfie by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:20:16 PM
Article V Convention by Bryan Emmel on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:12:18 AM
Two voting propositions by editnetwork on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:16:19 PM
which is why we need a convention by john de herrera on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:55:26 PM