Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   16 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Article V Convention: A Uniquely American Solution to Tyranny

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
Conventions, as a means of amending written constitutions, are a distinctly American institution. In fact, written constitutions originated in this country. The word constitution is used on both sides of the Atlantic to signify something superior to legislative acts: a single text of fundamental principles of government beyond the control of a legislature.

 

A constitution is a social agreement--a compact, a covenant, a contract--by which the whole society agrees with each citizen, and each citizen with their society; that all shall be governed by certain laws for the common good; that government is based upon a contract between a people and a state--as opposed to a contract between a people and a god.

The American colonies were bound not only by the terms of the unwritten British constitution, but more directly by charters (think corporation). These charters, of course, became suspended the moment the colonies declared independence. The colonists then organized to create new social contracts. Each colony made its contract embody fundamental principles. In fact several of the colonies re-adopted their British charters to serve as constitutions.

The political experience and theories of the colonists thus supplied four principles:

1) The employment of definite written instruments, prescribing the nature and form of government. 2) The idea of a constitution superior to ordinary legislation. 3) The conception of certain natural rights asserted by such a constitution. 4) The theory of the social contract--the written constitution, born in America--was the embodiment of these four principles.

As you may or may not know, our Constitution has written into it a convention clause. Over the years this clause has been erroneously referred to as a “constitutional convention.” But because the U.S. Constitution is unique in all political history, its convention clause is too, and is properly referred to as the Article V Convention.

This convention specific to our Constitution has very clearly defined powers, as the framers did not leave such affairs to chance. The Article V Convention can only propose ideas, it cannot ratify them. If America were to one day find a tipping-point majority of citizens fed up enough with the officials who currently people its government, and the call for a national convention were coerced out of the legislature, the inevitable would follow: the states would hold special elections for their delegates; those delegates would convene in the capitol on a date; once assembled, those delegates would then propose ideas for a 28th Amendment to our Constitution; once all amendment proposals were on the table, the convention would adjourn, and the ratification process would begin; once any of the proposed amendments garnered the approval of 38 states, it would become part of our constitution.

Because the bar for ratification is set at an approval rating of 75%, it means whatever the idea for the amendment is, whether a conservative idea or liberal, it must get all of one side signed on, plus at least half of the other. In other words, ratification sanctifies the popular will. In the past there have been arguments against the Article V Convention based on the notion that simply discussing an idea in public might somehow accidentally turn into a new law.

Such fears should more properly be applied to the runaway government (corporate charters) currently operating in our capitol.

We are taught that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are our premier founding documents, but we are not taught that the former was written into the latter: the Article V Convention.

 

I'm a writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. I've been an advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Hamlet 3:2

Hamlet 5:2

Note to Naomi Wolf

Short Playscript On Torture

Hamlet Adaptation (Act 1, Scene 3)

The First Stop Sign in America

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
8 people are discussing this page, with 16 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

As soon as we open up an Article V Convention, the... by Rady Ananda on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 11:37:36 AM
as you may remember, we just held two political co... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 12:36:33 PM
To learn the facts about the Article V convention ... by Joel S. Hirschhorn on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 1:31:57 PM
and thanks for adding the commentary. can you plea... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:04:44 PM
 STATEMENT OF FACTS Under Article V of the Co... by Harold Hellickson on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:24:52 PM
should read ever be held... by Harold Hellickson on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:58:27 PM
no one needs to be shot. what is, is no one's ... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:14:27 PM
-The founding fathers knew what they were doing. N... by Anti Vigilante on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:55:22 PM
from private intertests. a 28th amendment concerne... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 3:56:49 PM
Who's talking about elections? Irrelevant here... by Anti Vigilante on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 2:11:56 PM
the last five years of american history shows the ... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:02:56 PM
how can we enlighten hundreds of millions of our b... by Wolfie on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 5:54:38 PM
by making a documentary movie that sets the collec... by john de herrera on Tuesday, Sep 9, 2008 at 6:20:16 PM
Sometimes I have thought that an Article V convent... by Bryan Emmel on Wednesday, Sep 10, 2008 at 1:12:18 AM
(1) Enact public financing of (national office) ca... by editnetwork on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 12:16:19 PM
so people like you can be a delegate and work with... by john de herrera on Sunday, Sep 21, 2008 at 11:55:26 PM