Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 14 Share on Facebook 9 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest 1 Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 13 (38 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Stats   18 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

On Syria, AIPAC, The 800 Pound Gorilla, Risks Looking Like A Chimp! | MJ Rosenberg

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

News 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H1 9/7/13

Become a Fan
  (1 fan)
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from

AIPAC is taking an incredible risk by making an unprecedented full court press to pass the bomb Syria resolution.

Never in its history has it gone all out to achieve passage or defeat for anything not directly related to Israel. And, because Congress is snugly in its pocket on Israel issues, it rarely needs to fight.

by presstv

AIPAC's last big battle was in 1991 when it tried to get extra aid to support Soviet Jewish refugees in Israel. President George H. W. Bush said the extra aid (in the form of loan guarantees) would only be provided if Israel froze West Bank settlement construction. Prime Minister Shamir said no and Bush said: no extra aid for you.

AIPAC descended on the Hill as they now are over Syria, leading Bush to publicly say "I am one lonely little guy" up against "some powerful political forces" made up of "a thousand lobbyists on the Hill."

That battle did not end well for AIPAC although it did for Israel. It led the Israeli electorate to dump the rightist prime minister, Yitzhak Shamir, in favor of Yitzhak Rabin. Israel did not get the extra aid until Bush could provide it to a prime minister who pledged to freeze settlements and to negotiate with the Palestinians.

In that case, unlike this one, there was no Congressional vote. AIPAC was not able to test the formula pronounced by its top strategist, Steve Rosen (later indicted under the Espionage Act) who famously told the New Yorker:

- Advertisement -

You see this napkin? In twenty-four hours, we could have the signatures of seventy senators on this napkin.

The Syria vote will be the test.

AIPAC and its cutouts are the only lobbying forces supporting the administration's plans for war and Congress will make the decision. It should be a good moment for AIPAC to make its case. Members of Congress  are now in intense fund raising mode for the 2014 primaries and general election. When AIPAC visits in the next week or two, it will make the case for war with that looming overhead.

I called a friend on Capitol Hill to refresh my memory about what the AIPAC push is going to look like:

First come the phone calls from constituents who are AIPAC members. They know the Congressman and are nice and friendly and just tell him, or whichever staffer the constituent knows, just how important this vote is to him and his friends back in the district.

- Advertisement -

Then the donors call. The folks who have hosted fundraisers. They are usually not only from the district but from New York or LA or Chicago. They repeat the message: this vote is very important.

Contrary to what you might expect, they do not mention campaign money. They don't have to. Because these callers are people who only know the Congressman through their checks, the threat not to write any more of them is implicit. Like the constituents, the donors are using AIPAC talking points which are simple and forceful. You can argue with them but they keep going back to the script. Did I mention the rabbis? We only have a few in our district but we get calls from all of them and from other rabbis from around the state.

Then there are the AIPAC lobbyists, the professional staffers. They come in, with or without appointments. If the Congressman is in, they expect to see him immediately. If not, they will see a staffer. If they don't like what they hear, they will keep coming back. They are very aggressive, no other lobby comes close, They expect to see the Member, not mere staff.

Next Page  1  |  2

M.J. Rosenberg is Special Correspondent for The Washington Spectator. Previously he served as a Senior Foreign Policy Fellow with Media Matters Action Network, and prior to that worked on Capitol Hill for various Democratic members of the House and (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

On Syria, AIPAC, The 800 Pound Gorilla, Risks Looking Like A Chimp! | MJ Rosenberg


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
15 people are discussing this page, with 18 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

First come the phone calls from constituents... Th... by Phil Weingart on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 12:49:38 PM
It's more sinister than Mr Rosenberg believes. Ema... by James Carlisle on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:08:41 PM
Ya, you betcha! It IS a citizen run nation! Citize... by thepiffler on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:22:00 PM
Nothing like being able to buy another persons gov... by kappie on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:41:53 AM
You're right, Phil. There's no prouder tradition i... by D S on Monday, Sep 9, 2013 at 11:03:00 AM
Israel is desperate not only for war but to prove ... by Michael Rivero on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 1:37:18 PM
Again? AIPAC is an American lobby not Israel's! Th... by Abe Bird on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 2:56:17 PM
How about the money that funds AIPAC?  It may... by yunus Luebben on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:06:25 PM
Who supplies the money to AIPAC and who gives them... by kappie on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:44:39 AM
Michael, I agree with you 100 percent. ... by Larry Toenjes on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:14:52 PM
I sincerely hope you are correct.... by Kimberly Johnston on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 3:49:10 PM
Recently Opednews banned the use of the terms z... by paulvcassidy on Saturday, Sep 7, 2013 at 6:56:06 PM
I suggest you try to post a comment with the word ... by Rob Kall on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 12:11:19 AM
Rob - you do maintain watch .. Ok so. It's not t... by paulvcassidy on Monday, Sep 9, 2013 at 6:40:13 AM
On an otherwise flawless and truthful Op-Ed, Mr. R... by syed mahdi on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 5:07:19 AM
In 1930 Weimar Germany, Jews controlled 103 of the... by JohnWV on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 10:22:03 AM
I have long pondered these things, or things of th... by Daniel Geery on Sunday, Sep 8, 2013 at 11:27:27 AM
I don't know whose in charge of the international ... by paulvcassidy on Monday, Sep 9, 2013 at 8:22:59 AM