Tag(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Well Said 4   Valuable 3   Must Read 2   View Ratings | Rate It

Promoted to Headline (H3) on 12/8/10:     Permalink
View Article Stats      (12 comments)

Olbermann's Scathing Indictment of President Obama's Tax Cut Deal

Add this Page to Facebook!
Submit to Twitter
Submit to Reddit
Submit to Stumble Upon

Tell A Friend

Become a Fan
Get Embed HTML Code
By (about the author)

Become a Fan Become a Fan  (65 fans)   -- Page 1 of 2 page(s)

opednews.com


Screenshot from the "Special Comment" delivered last night by Keith Olbermann


Just like many progressives or liberals, Keith Olbermann, host of the MSNBC show "Countdown," expressed outrage at President Obama's tax cut deal. The way he described the nature of the economy was especially pointed (especially since he actually used the word "capitalism"):

The economy is surprisingly simple. If business and the rich won't spend, and the middle class can't spend, the only factor left to keep pushing money into the insatiable maw of capitalism is the government.

So, should the government give the money to the rich who keep it, or to the not rich, who spend it? Apparently this President does not know the answer to that question, even though he has his own Council of Economic Advisers.

Mr. President, for these meager crumbs, you have given up costly, insulting, divisive, destructive tax cuts for the rich, and you have given in to Republican blackmail, which will be followed by more Republican blackmail. Of course, it's not just tax cuts for the rich that you've given up.

There is also your new temporary payroll tax holiday, establishing a precedent that the way money is pumped into Social Security should be negotiated and traded off, and making it just that much easier to gut Social Security later.

Olbermann's anecdote about a senior official in the Obama Administration attempting to sell him on the deal is typical of what progressives or liberals have learned to expect from Obama. Olbermann told the official that would be fine but "frankly the base has just vanished." The official replied, "Well, then they must not have read the details." Essentially, the Administration would like Americans to believe liberals didn't read it properly and that's why liberals think it is a bad deal.


Each time this Administration has been up against the ropes it has fallen back on its ability to chide or outright criticize liberals. Vice President Joe Biden urged progressives to "get in gear" during the midterm elections or face serious consequences. In August, White House Press Secretary went after the "professional left" and said what Obama is doing will never be "good enough." Former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel told a closed door meeting of top liberal leaders in the fall of 2009 they were "fucking stupid" to be running ads pressuring Blue Dogs and centrist Democratic Senators to back the public option. Sen. Evan Bayh (D-IN) said Democrats had pushed their agenda too far left and had alienated voters when Republican Senator Scott Brown won in Massachusetts. And, recently, Obama called out "purist" and "sanctimonious" progressives for being upset with him.

Olbermann gave voice to liberals who are tired of being characterized as petulant, purist, sanctimonious and unreasonable people:

There, in a nutshell, is this Administration. They didn't make a bad deal. We just don't understand it.

Just as it was our fault, Mr. President, for not understanding your refusal of even the most perfunctory of investigations of rendition or domestic spying or the other crimes of the Bush Administration, or why you have now established for those future administrations who want to repeat those crimes, that the punishment for them will be nothing.

Just as it was our fault, Mr. President, for not understanding Afghanistan. Just as we didn't correctly perceive, sir, the necessity for the continuation of Gitmo. Or how we failed to intuit, President Obama, your preemptive abandonment of single payer and the public option. Or how we could not have foreseen your foot-dragging on "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."

Just as we shouldn't have gotten you angry at your news conference today and made all the moderate Democrats wonder why in the hell you get publicly angry so often at the liberals who campaigned for you, and whether you might save just a touch of that sarcasm and that self-martyrdom for the Republicans.

And of course, Mr. President we totally betrayed your administration by not concluding our prayers every night by saying "thank you for preventing another Great Depression; you are entitled to skate along on your own wonderfulness indefinitely. And if you get less than you could have on health care reform or taxes, well, that'll be OK; we're happy to pay 10,000 bucks for a 300 dollar car because hey, it could've been 20,000, right? And because we only expect you to do one thing correctly during a presidency, and you know you had pretty much cleared that obligation when it proved that you were, indeed, not John McCain."

We are very sorry.

Americans who voted Obama are reaching a breaking point. They are less and less willing to only ask that Obama not be John McCain (perhaps, because he acts more and more like McCain each day that his presidency progresses onward).

There should be no hesitation in breaking with this Administration. Voice your grievances with this president loudly and clearly. Do not be afraid to rebel. The more vocal people are, the sooner we reverse the terrible trajectory that was kickstarted by President Nixon and corporate Democrats back in the 1970s, escalated and nurtured by President Reagan, continued by President Bush, adopted and expanded by President Clinton, put on steroids by President George W. Bush and willfully embraced by President Obama.

From Tuesday night, December 7th, here's Olbermann's "Special Comment":

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Kevin Gosztola is a writer and curator of Firedoglake's blog The Dissenter, a blog covering civil liberties in the age of technology. He is an editor for OpEdNews.com and a former intern and videographer for The Nation Magazine.And, he's the (more...)
 

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author
and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Follow Me on Twitter

 

Share this page: (what's this?)                   Tell a Friend: Tell A Friend

Add this Page to Facebook!      Submit to Stumble Upon      Submit to Reddit      Add This Page to Mr Wong!           NEWSVINE      DEl.ICIO.US      Looksmart Furl      My Web      Blink List     (More...)

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
12 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

Is It all for Love? by Robert Arend on Wednesday, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:42:35 PM
Good one! by Jon Ross on Wednesday, Dec 8, 2010 at 11:05:19 PM
The truimph of desire over reality by steve windisch on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:18:37 AM
I particularly liked the Thurber reference... by John Sanchez Jr. on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:31:49 AM
If anything by Allen Oliver on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:52:37 AM
I'm more interested in my fellow Americans by Kevin Gosztola on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:47:18 AM
Very true, by Allen Oliver on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:43:03 PM
waking up by liberalsrock on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:50:42 AM
The Democratic Party has been purchased by Kevin Gosztola on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:52:04 AM
People's front by Mark Sashine on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:12:03 AM
I'm with you, Mark by Margaret Bassett on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:49:10 AM
Hard Words by David Roche on Thursday, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:05:50 PM