Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  
Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites View Article Stats   6 comments

OpEdNews Op Eds

Oil and The Gulf

By (about the author)     Permalink       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 5/11/10

Become a Fan
  (6 fans)

Well, geez, what a surprise. We're getting another serious lesson in sustainability. Oil doesn't qualify.

Our first big lesson came in the early 1070s, when the U.S. and other Israel supporting countries felt the effects of an oil embargo initiated by oil producing countries in the Middle East. Then in 1979 we suffered another shortage due to the Iranian Revolution which removed the Shah and allowed the Ayatollah Khomeini to rise to power. We throw in the War(s) on Iraq, and the many other conflicts in that part of the world and we reach a simple conclusion. The conclusion is that, from a geopolitical perspective, oil is unsustainable.

From the perspective of consumption, we find another marker. Climate change. Anyone who doesn't think the science is 'in' on this does so at their, and our, peril. There is no question the seas are rising, and that means we're getting warmer. We may argue the cause, but we cannot argue the likelihood that all the carbon we've been throwing into the air these last 300 or 400 years [first coal, then oil] is going to have negative effects. So again we find oil is unsustainable.

Which brings us the BP oil rig explosion and the ensuing mess we're facing in the Gulf of Mexico. Already experts are suggesting this could be far worse than the Exxon Valdez tanker accident off the coast of Alaska. Some suggest we not use the word 'spill', as that implies a finite amount of something being spilled. Continually spewing 25,000 gallons of oil a day, maybe 10 times that? We probably need a new word. We may see contaminated beaches, ruined livelihoods, and ecological disaster from Texas to Florida. Oh yes, and let's not forget the chemical soup of dispersants being dumped deeply and on the surface to break up this mess. What we are sure of is that no one has any idea of the potential far-reaching effects of thousands of tons of chemicals. Not good.

But when I titled this entry, I was also thinking of another gulf. And this, the gulf between our energy interests and energy policy. With the production crises of the 1970s, there was a lot of talk about conservation and other policies to remove our dependence on foreign oil. How effective was that? Well, we went from 28% in 1979 to 66% in 2007.
And again the uproar 20 years ago with the Alaskan Oil Spill. And again no positive results. And only a few weeks ago President Obama suggested more 'drill, baby, drill' options on the East Coast. Yuck.

Chris Matthews made a salient point on Bill Maher's HBO show last recently. The same time this spill kicks in down south, a massive wind farm off Cape Cod is approved. He described it as 'a teachable moment', and I couldn't agree more.

But if we look at this 40 year history of oil troubles, we see the same pattern emerge as we see emerge in so many other areas of our lives. Elitist interests trumping the common good. Our policies haven't improved, because our government is controlled by money, in this case energy corporations money.

It's the same reason we give the billions in subsidies to energy interests while we drip some handful of millions at alternative energy sources. As always, we see more clearly how our world works when we follow the money.

An irony here is that I don't see our elected officials even seeing the connection between their past policies and sucking up to energy interests. Oh, the word about Cheney, Bush and energy policy is starting to get out, but our whole congress is complicit. And we're still giving ecological impact exemptions for new drill sites? Another reason to throw the bums out.

In our new World5 world, we appreciate our two most great and constant needs [assuming access to clean air and water] as food and energy. We further appreciate that the more we localize these two needs, the more we gain stability, control and sustainability. Of course it will be some while before we are weaned from oil as an energy source, but that time comes much sooner with an honest and concerted effort, as opposed to the green washing and bullshit we get from massive energy corporations.

In world5, none of this mess happens. Companies don't think twice about fail-safe valve systems because they care. Absentee ownership doesn't give one permission to pollute. Indeed, in world5, the word ownership comes to mean stewardship. We are, after all, all in this together.

 

http://world5.org

Jim Prues is the Founder of World 5.0 and running for congress in the First District of Ohio. He understands that 'democracy is not a spectator sport.'

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact Author Contact Editor View Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Principle of Universality

In Praise of Hemp

Occupy Life

The GOP and the ACA

Occupy World 5.0

An Uneducated Electorate

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

Comments: Expand   Shrink   Hide  
4 people are discussing this page, with 6 comments
To view all comments:
Expand Comments
(Or you can set your preferences to show all comments, always)

This notion that some 'other', whether corporation... by Jim Prues on Tuesday, May 11, 2010 at 5:01:48 PM
We can agree we're at the point Jim is talking abo... by JohnPeebles on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 2:57:54 AM
We can agree we're at the point Jim is talking abo... by JohnPeebles on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 2:59:17 AM
One hears the politicos constantly repeat that we ... by John Reed on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 7:13:01 AM
We see the same patterns we see in oil and energy ... by Jim Prues on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 10:52:05 AM
Just like the oil companies extracting "natural re... by boomerang on Wednesday, May 12, 2010 at 2:16:43 PM